Do temporary help agencies help? Employment transitions for low-skilled workers

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Labour Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102586
Raquel Carrasco , Ismael Gálvez-Iniesta , Belén Jerez
{"title":"Do temporary help agencies help? Employment transitions for low-skilled workers","authors":"Raquel Carrasco ,&nbsp;Ismael Gálvez-Iniesta ,&nbsp;Belén Jerez","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the impact of working for a temporary help agency (THA) compared to being directly hired on the employment transitions of low-skilled male temporary workers aged 20 to 45. Using data from Spanish administrative records, we employ competing risk discrete-time duration models to analyze multiple temporary employment spells. Our analysis reveals the importance of accounting for short-duration dependence and workers’ unobserved heterogeneity. We find that, across all durations, agency workers are more likely to transition either to unemployment or to a new THA contract than their direct-hire counterparts. Transitions to permanent positions, although infrequent in our sample, are also more likely for agency workers. Our qualitative findings hold when unobserved heterogeneity is not controlled for. However, this model underestimates the effect of agency contracts on the risk of entering unemployment and overestimates the impact on the probability of re-entering THA. This suggests that positive self-selection plays a relevant role in explaining the higher persistence of THA employment, but not the associated higher risk of unemployment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48153,"journal":{"name":"Labour Economics","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 102586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000812/pdfft?md5=99e295a5a5a645f20fd7fa6c7dfad20f&pid=1-s2.0-S0927537124000812-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the impact of working for a temporary help agency (THA) compared to being directly hired on the employment transitions of low-skilled male temporary workers aged 20 to 45. Using data from Spanish administrative records, we employ competing risk discrete-time duration models to analyze multiple temporary employment spells. Our analysis reveals the importance of accounting for short-duration dependence and workers’ unobserved heterogeneity. We find that, across all durations, agency workers are more likely to transition either to unemployment or to a new THA contract than their direct-hire counterparts. Transitions to permanent positions, although infrequent in our sample, are also more likely for agency workers. Our qualitative findings hold when unobserved heterogeneity is not controlled for. However, this model underestimates the effect of agency contracts on the risk of entering unemployment and overestimates the impact on the probability of re-entering THA. This suggests that positive self-selection plays a relevant role in explaining the higher persistence of THA employment, but not the associated higher risk of unemployment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临时帮助机构有帮助吗?低技能工人的就业过渡
我们研究了为临时帮工机构(THA)工作与直接受雇相比,对 20 至 45 岁低技能男性临时工就业转型的影响。我们利用西班牙行政记录中的数据,采用竞争风险离散时间持续模型来分析多个临时就业期。我们的分析揭示了考虑短期依赖性和工人未观察到的异质性的重要性。我们发现,在所有期限内,与直接雇佣的工人相比,中介公司的工人更有可能转为失业或转为新的临时雇佣合同。虽然在我们的样本中,转为长期职位的情况并不常见,但中介公司的员工也更有可能转为长期职位。在不控制未观察到的异质性的情况下,我们的定性结论是成立的。然而,该模型低估了中介合同对失业风险的影响,高估了中介合同对重新进入 THA 概率的影响。这表明,积极的自我选择在解释较高的临时工就业持续性方面发挥了相关作用,但在解释相关的较高失业风险方面却没有发挥相关作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour Economics
Labour Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Labour Economics is devoted to publishing research in the field of labour economics both on the microeconomic and on the macroeconomic level, in a balanced mix of theory, empirical testing and policy applications. It gives due recognition to analysis and explanation of institutional arrangements of national labour markets and the impact of these institutions on labour market outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Improving children's foundational learning through community-school participation: Experimental evidence from rural India The apple doesn't fall far from the tree: Intergenerational wealth mobility in Taiwan Incentive contracts with pay gap and pay equity Is sex ratio a valid distribution factor in a collective model?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1