Mendelian randomization study on association between grip strength and BMD in different age groups.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1007/s00774-024-01519-1
Yingying Zhu, Kede Chi, Jiaci Wang
{"title":"Mendelian randomization study on association between grip strength and BMD in different age groups.","authors":"Yingying Zhu, Kede Chi, Jiaci Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00774-024-01519-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to use the Mendelian randomization study method to verify the causal relationship between grip strength and bone mineral density (BMD) in different ages and different parts of the body.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The analysis was based on pooled data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Hand grip strength (right) was used as the exposure variable and total body bone mineral density (BMD) of different age groups was used as the outcome variable. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms highly correlated with exposure variables were used as instrumental variables. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis method, and the Mendelian randomization Egger (MR-Egger) regression and weighted median methods were used as supplementary evidence for the IVW results. Horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests were conducted to ensure the stability of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyzing the GWAS data on osteoporosis as the outcome variable, the IVW analysis showed that osteoporosis risk was associated with decreased grip strength in the 45-60 age group and the risk of declining lumbar spine BMD was associated with decreased grip strength. However, there was no significant correlation between the risk of osteoporosis in other age groups and changes in grip strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A causal relationship exists between decreased grip strength and osteoporosis risk in people aged 45-60 years. The risk of BMD declining in the lumbar spine was associated with reduced grip strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":15116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"564-581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01519-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to use the Mendelian randomization study method to verify the causal relationship between grip strength and bone mineral density (BMD) in different ages and different parts of the body.

Materials and methods: The analysis was based on pooled data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Hand grip strength (right) was used as the exposure variable and total body bone mineral density (BMD) of different age groups was used as the outcome variable. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms highly correlated with exposure variables were used as instrumental variables. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis method, and the Mendelian randomization Egger (MR-Egger) regression and weighted median methods were used as supplementary evidence for the IVW results. Horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests were conducted to ensure the stability of the results.

Results: Analyzing the GWAS data on osteoporosis as the outcome variable, the IVW analysis showed that osteoporosis risk was associated with decreased grip strength in the 45-60 age group and the risk of declining lumbar spine BMD was associated with decreased grip strength. However, there was no significant correlation between the risk of osteoporosis in other age groups and changes in grip strength.

Conclusion: A causal relationship exists between decreased grip strength and osteoporosis risk in people aged 45-60 years. The risk of BMD declining in the lumbar spine was associated with reduced grip strength.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于不同年龄组握力与骨密度关系的孟德尔随机研究
导言本研究旨在利用孟德尔随机研究方法,验证不同年龄和不同部位的握力与骨矿物质密度(BMD)之间的因果关系:分析基于全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总数据。将手部握力(右)作为暴露变量,将不同年龄组的全身骨矿物质密度(BMD)作为结果变量。与暴露变量高度相关的单核苷酸多态性被用作工具变量。反方差加权(IVW)法被用作主要分析方法,孟德尔随机化艾格(MR-Egger)回归法和加权中位数法被用作 IVW 结果的补充证据。为确保结果的稳定性,还进行了水平多向性和异质性检验:通过分析以骨质疏松症为结果变量的 GWAS 数据,IVW 分析表明,在 45-60 岁年龄组中,骨质疏松症风险与握力下降相关,腰椎 BMD 下降风险与握力下降相关。然而,其他年龄组的骨质疏松症风险与握力变化之间没有明显的相关性:结论:45-60 岁人群握力下降与骨质疏松症风险之间存在因果关系。腰椎骨密度下降的风险与握力下降有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (JBMM) provides an international forum for researchers and clinicians to present and discuss topics relevant to bone, teeth, and mineral metabolism, as well as joint and musculoskeletal disorders. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. Acceptance is based on the originality, significance, and validity of the material presented. The journal is aimed at researchers and clinicians dedicated to improvements in research, development, and patient-care in the fields of bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Osteoporosis screening using X-ray assessment and osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians in hip surgery patients. Responders and non-responders to romosozumab treatment. Multiple thyroid disorders and risk of osteoporosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Histological assessments for anabolic effects in teriparatide/abaloparatide administered rodent models. List of reviewers 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1