The space of permanent and state-level exceptional security measures: Formative years of Israel and Turkey

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Security Dialogue Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1177/09670106241234206
Burcu Türkoğlu, Z. A. Elitsoy
{"title":"The space of permanent and state-level exceptional security measures: Formative years of Israel and Turkey","authors":"Burcu Türkoğlu, Z. A. Elitsoy","doi":"10.1177/09670106241234206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies examining the spatial patterns of exceptional security measures focus on constructed spaces or national territories exposed to international military intervention. Contemporary literature defines these spaces as zones of lawlessness where the exception prevails. By examining the security policies in the historical homelands of the Palestinians in Israel and the Kurds in Turkey, this article shows how exceptional security and the law co-constitute each other. Through a comparative historical analysis of the formative years of the Israeli and Turkish states, we argue that permanent exceptional security measures in territories inhabited by minority citizens are relevant to the political context in which the constituent power frames the political characteristics of the nation. In the process, exceptional security measures coexisting with the law become instrumental in maintaining and reproducing the distinction between the ‘legitimate members’ of the nation and the ‘enemies’ of the nation/state. The coexistence of exceptional security measures with the legal system challenges the conventional understanding of the exception and its dichotomous relationship with the norm, as outlined by Schmitt and Agamben. Instead, the conceptual framework of ‘legal violence,’ as articulated by Benjamin, offers a more comprehensive perspective for understanding the early years of the Israeli and Turkish states.","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241234206","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies examining the spatial patterns of exceptional security measures focus on constructed spaces or national territories exposed to international military intervention. Contemporary literature defines these spaces as zones of lawlessness where the exception prevails. By examining the security policies in the historical homelands of the Palestinians in Israel and the Kurds in Turkey, this article shows how exceptional security and the law co-constitute each other. Through a comparative historical analysis of the formative years of the Israeli and Turkish states, we argue that permanent exceptional security measures in territories inhabited by minority citizens are relevant to the political context in which the constituent power frames the political characteristics of the nation. In the process, exceptional security measures coexisting with the law become instrumental in maintaining and reproducing the distinction between the ‘legitimate members’ of the nation and the ‘enemies’ of the nation/state. The coexistence of exceptional security measures with the legal system challenges the conventional understanding of the exception and its dichotomous relationship with the norm, as outlined by Schmitt and Agamben. Instead, the conceptual framework of ‘legal violence,’ as articulated by Benjamin, offers a more comprehensive perspective for understanding the early years of the Israeli and Turkish states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
永久性和国家级特殊安全措施的空间:以色列和土耳其的成长岁月
对特殊安全措施的空间模式进行研究的重点是受到国际军事干预的建构空间或国家领土。当代文献将这些空间定义为无法无天的区域,在这些区域中例外情况盛行。本文通过研究以色列境内巴勒斯坦人和土耳其境内库尔德人历史家园的安全政策,展示了特殊安全与法律是如何相互共存的。通过对以色列和土耳其国家形成时期的历史比较分析,我们认为,在少数民族公民居住的领土上采取的永久性特殊安全措施与政治背景相关,而政治背景正是制宪国塑造国家政治特征的环境。在此过程中,与法律并存的特殊安全措施有助于维持和再现民族 "合法成员 "与民族/国家 "敌人 "之间的区别。特殊安全措施与法律制度的共存挑战了施密特和阿甘本对例外及其与规范二分关系的传统理解。相反,本雅明所阐述的 "法律暴力 "概念框架为理解以色列和土耳其建国初期的情况提供了一个更全面的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Security Dialogue
Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
(In)security in subordination: Policing and policework in postcolonial Pakistan The space of permanent and state-level exceptional security measures: Formative years of Israel and Turkey The necropolitics of military amnesty: Peacebuilding and Othering in Northern Ireland A gendered security dispositif: Mobilizing gender in Mexico City #ResisteGozando (joy as resistance): On the healing power of dance at the US–Mexico border
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1