Simplified estimation of reliability in structures subjected to seismic loads using the demand-capacity ratio format

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s10518-024-01923-y
Ricardo B. Flores, Dante Tolentino
{"title":"Simplified estimation of reliability in structures subjected to seismic loads using the demand-capacity ratio format","authors":"Ricardo B. Flores,&nbsp;Dante Tolentino","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01923-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, closed-form expressions to calculate both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor are proposed. Reliability indicators are estimated assuming a normalization between capacity and demand called <span>\\(I_{DC}\\)</span><sub><i>.</i></sub> Simplified closed-form expressions are obtained in accordance with the probability seismic demand analysis used in SAC/FEMA. Uncertainties associated to mechanical, geometrical, and epistemic properties are taken into account, as well as uncertainties related to the occurrence of earthquakes. A comparison of both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor with <span>\\(I_{DC}\\)</span> and the expressions proposed by Cornell and collaborators is performed. The numerical approach for the mean annual failure rate is obtained to verify the approximation of the closed-form solutions. Reliability indicators are obtained using six continuous reinforced concrete bridges designed to comply with three drift thresholds (0.002, 0.003 and 0.004). The bridge systems are situated in transition soil of Mexico City. Maximum differences of 4.1% and 10.6% are obtained between the proposed expression and the numerical solution for the mean annual rate of failure, estimated for two limit states: serviceability and collapse. The confidence factor presents differences of 5.2% between the present study and the original formulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 9","pages":"4635 - 4655"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01923-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, closed-form expressions to calculate both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor are proposed. Reliability indicators are estimated assuming a normalization between capacity and demand called \(I_{DC}\). Simplified closed-form expressions are obtained in accordance with the probability seismic demand analysis used in SAC/FEMA. Uncertainties associated to mechanical, geometrical, and epistemic properties are taken into account, as well as uncertainties related to the occurrence of earthquakes. A comparison of both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor with \(I_{DC}\) and the expressions proposed by Cornell and collaborators is performed. The numerical approach for the mean annual failure rate is obtained to verify the approximation of the closed-form solutions. Reliability indicators are obtained using six continuous reinforced concrete bridges designed to comply with three drift thresholds (0.002, 0.003 and 0.004). The bridge systems are situated in transition soil of Mexico City. Maximum differences of 4.1% and 10.6% are obtained between the proposed expression and the numerical solution for the mean annual rate of failure, estimated for two limit states: serviceability and collapse. The confidence factor presents differences of 5.2% between the present study and the original formulation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用需求容量比格式简化地震荷载作用下结构的可靠性评估
本文提出了计算平均年故障率和置信系数的闭式表达式。可靠性指标的估算假定了容量与需求之间的归一化,称为 \(I_{DC}\)。根据 SAC/FEMA 中使用的概率地震需求分析,得到了简化的闭式表达式。考虑了与机械、几何和认识特性相关的不确定性,以及与地震发生相关的不确定性。对年平均故障率和置信系数与 \(I_{DC}\) 以及 Cornell 及其合作者提出的表达式进行了比较。获得了平均年破坏率的数值方法,以验证闭式解的近似性。利用六座连续钢筋混凝土桥梁,按照三个漂移阈值(0.002、0.003 和 0.004)进行设计,获得了可靠性指标。这些桥梁系统位于墨西哥城的过渡土壤中。根据两种极限状态(适用性和坍塌)估算的平均年破坏率,建议表达式与数值解之间的最大差异分别为 4.1% 和 10.6%。本研究与原始公式的置信系数相差 5.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
期刊最新文献
Towards seismic risk reduction of critical facilities combining earthquake early warning and structural monitoring: a demonstration study Seismic evaluation and comparison of ground motion characteristics in Kahramanmaras and Hatay provinces following the 2023 Pazarcik-Elbistan Earthquake sequences Using image-based inspection data to improve response predictions of earthquake-damaged unreinforced masonry buildings Experimental cyclic testing of masonry pier-spandrel substructures reinforced with engineered cementitious composites overlay Influence of opening shape, size and position on the ultimate strength, stiffness and energy dissipation of confined brick masonry walls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1