Geochemical analysis of extremely fine-grained cryptotephra: New developments and recommended practices

IF 1.7 2区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Quaternary Geochronology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.quageo.2024.101553
Helen M. Innes, William Hutchison, Andrea Burke
{"title":"Geochemical analysis of extremely fine-grained cryptotephra: New developments and recommended practices","authors":"Helen M. Innes,&nbsp;William Hutchison,&nbsp;Andrea Burke","doi":"10.1016/j.quageo.2024.101553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tephrochronology is a powerful tool used to synchronise and date stratigraphic records by accurate and precise geochemical analysis of deposited volcanic glass shards. However, in many distal stratigraphic records (e.g., polar ice cores) tephra shards are often extremely fine-grained (&lt;10 μm). Geochemical characterisation of these shards is challenging because conventional preparation and analytical techniques require highly polished glass areas &gt;5 μm for electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) to ensure high analytical totals and minimise alkali element loss. Recent method developments have put forward alternative approaches to accurately measure major oxides of small shards: a smaller 3 μm diameter beam, overlapping large (20 μm) beam areas onto supporting epoxy resin, and using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS). However, there has been no direct intercomparison of these alternative techniques, which to date have only been tested on a limited range of glass compositions and tephras that are much larger than the extremely fine-grained material found in distal archives. These issues complicate decision making about the best analytical approach to take when faced with small shards. Here, we provide a new workflow protocol for the analysis of &lt;10 μm tephra by determining the accuracy and precision of alternative SEM-EPMA methods. By analysing a variety of glass standards including those prepared to replicate fine-grained ice-core cryptotephras, we show that a 3 μm EPMA beam is suitable for use on all glass compositions provided the beam current is reduced to 1 nA. When glass areas are too small for a 3 μm beam we show that overlapping this small beam onto epoxy resin is preferable to SEM-EDS analysis. We also provide evidence confirming that using 3–0.2 μm polishes for &lt;5 min increases analytical precision of the most abundant major oxides by up to three times, whilst, crucially, preserving the smallest shards in a sample. By directly applying these alternative methods to ice-core cryptotephra, we demonstrate the data are of suitable accuracy and precision to make robust geochemical correlations. This workflow can be applied to future tephrochronology studies, significantly increasing the quality and quantity of data that are obtained from cryptotephra horizons in distal records.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54516,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101424000578/pdfft?md5=3e6536ad8c7a07eb566dae6a3bee163b&pid=1-s2.0-S1871101424000578-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101424000578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tephrochronology is a powerful tool used to synchronise and date stratigraphic records by accurate and precise geochemical analysis of deposited volcanic glass shards. However, in many distal stratigraphic records (e.g., polar ice cores) tephra shards are often extremely fine-grained (<10 μm). Geochemical characterisation of these shards is challenging because conventional preparation and analytical techniques require highly polished glass areas >5 μm for electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) to ensure high analytical totals and minimise alkali element loss. Recent method developments have put forward alternative approaches to accurately measure major oxides of small shards: a smaller 3 μm diameter beam, overlapping large (20 μm) beam areas onto supporting epoxy resin, and using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS). However, there has been no direct intercomparison of these alternative techniques, which to date have only been tested on a limited range of glass compositions and tephras that are much larger than the extremely fine-grained material found in distal archives. These issues complicate decision making about the best analytical approach to take when faced with small shards. Here, we provide a new workflow protocol for the analysis of <10 μm tephra by determining the accuracy and precision of alternative SEM-EPMA methods. By analysing a variety of glass standards including those prepared to replicate fine-grained ice-core cryptotephras, we show that a 3 μm EPMA beam is suitable for use on all glass compositions provided the beam current is reduced to 1 nA. When glass areas are too small for a 3 μm beam we show that overlapping this small beam onto epoxy resin is preferable to SEM-EDS analysis. We also provide evidence confirming that using 3–0.2 μm polishes for <5 min increases analytical precision of the most abundant major oxides by up to three times, whilst, crucially, preserving the smallest shards in a sample. By directly applying these alternative methods to ice-core cryptotephra, we demonstrate the data are of suitable accuracy and precision to make robust geochemical correlations. This workflow can be applied to future tephrochronology studies, significantly increasing the quality and quantity of data that are obtained from cryptotephra horizons in distal records.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极细粒度隐翅虫的地球化学分析:新进展和推荐做法。
通过对沉积的火山玻璃碎片进行精确的地球化学分析,喷发年代学是同步地层记录和确定年代的有力工具。然而,在许多远端地层记录(如极地冰芯)中,火山碎屑通常颗粒极细(10 微米)。由于传统的制备和分析技术要求电子探针显微分析(EPMA)使用高度抛光的玻璃区域(5 μm),以确保较高的分析总量并最大限度地减少碱元素的损失,因此对这些碎片进行地球化学表征具有挑战性。最近开发的方法提出了精确测量小碎片主要氧化物的替代方法:使用直径为 3 μm 的较小光束、在支撑环氧树脂上重叠较大(20 μm)的光束区域,以及使用扫描电子显微镜与能量色散光谱法(SEM-EDS)。然而,这些替代技术之间还没有直接的比较,迄今为止,只在有限范围的玻璃成分和比远端档案中发现的极细粒度材料大得多的表土上进行过测试。这些问题使我们在面对小碎片时做出最佳分析方法的决策变得更加复杂。在这里,我们通过确定替代 SEM-EPMA 方法的准确性和精确性,为分析 10 μm 蛋白质碎屑提供了一种新的工作流程规程。通过分析各种玻璃标准(包括为复制细粒度冰芯隐斑而制备的玻璃标准),我们发现只要将光束电流降至 1 nA,3 μm EPMA 光束就可用于所有玻璃成分。当玻璃区域太小而无法使用 3 μm 光束时,我们发现将这种小光束重叠到环氧树脂上比 SEM-EDS 分析更为理想。我们还提供证据证实,使用 3-0.2 μm 抛光剂 5 分钟可将最丰富的主要氧化物的分析精度提高三倍,同时,关键的是还能保留样品中最小的碎片。通过将这些替代方法直接应用于冰芯隐翅虫,我们证明了数据具有适当的准确性和精确性,可以进行可靠的地球化学关联分析。这一工作流程可应用于未来的热年代学研究,从而大大提高从远端记录的隐斑地层中获得的数据的质量和数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary Geochronology
Quaternary Geochronology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Quaternary Geochronology is an international journal devoted to the publication of the highest-quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of dating methods applicable to the Quaternary Period - the last 2.6 million years of Earth history. Reliable ages are fundamental to place changes in climates, landscapes, flora and fauna - including the evolution and ecological impact of humans - in their correct temporal sequence, and to understand the tempo and mode of geological and biological processes.
期刊最新文献
Luminescence dating of rock surfaces in challenging environments: The case of MIS5e gravelly transgressive lag deposit (Southern Sardinia, West Mediterranean Sea) Isothermal thermoluminescence dating of speleothem growth – A case study from Bleßberg cave 2, Germany Single grain K-feldspar MET-IRSL sediment transport determination: Bleaching patterns and rates Downstream change of luminescence sensitivity in sedimentary quartz and the rearrangement of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) components along two large rivers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1