Global value chains before and in times of the COVID-19 pandemic

Paweł Folfas
{"title":"Global value chains before and in times of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Paweł Folfas","doi":"10.2478/ijme-2024-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to examine the changes in global value chains (GVCs) in the years 2020–2022 (times of the COVID-19 pandemic) compared to 2019 (last year before the pandemic). GVCs are illustrated by diagrams based on the statistics on international trade measured by value-added exports and imports. In this paper, the final demand approach is applied to measure international trade by value-added exports and imports and they were computed based on inter-country input-output tables delivered by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The catchphrase “Made in the World” makes an impression, but in reality, value chains are rarely global. They are rather regional with three centers. “Factory Europe”, “Factory Asia”, and “Factory America” can easily be identified in the years 2019–2022 as there were three large regional supply hubs in GVCs: Germany, China, and the United States. When the years 2020–2022 were compared to 2019, “Factory Asia” with center in China elevated their position in GVCs at the expense of “Factory Europe” with center in Germany and “Factory America with center in the USA.”","PeriodicalId":43388,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2024-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to examine the changes in global value chains (GVCs) in the years 2020–2022 (times of the COVID-19 pandemic) compared to 2019 (last year before the pandemic). GVCs are illustrated by diagrams based on the statistics on international trade measured by value-added exports and imports. In this paper, the final demand approach is applied to measure international trade by value-added exports and imports and they were computed based on inter-country input-output tables delivered by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The catchphrase “Made in the World” makes an impression, but in reality, value chains are rarely global. They are rather regional with three centers. “Factory Europe”, “Factory Asia”, and “Factory America” can easily be identified in the years 2019–2022 as there were three large regional supply hubs in GVCs: Germany, China, and the United States. When the years 2020–2022 were compared to 2019, “Factory Asia” with center in China elevated their position in GVCs at the expense of “Factory Europe” with center in Germany and “Factory America with center in the USA.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的全球价值链
摘要 本文旨在研究 2020-2022 年(COVID-19 大流行时期)与 2019 年(大流行前的最后一年)相比,全球价值链(GVC)发生的变化。全球价值链的图示基于以进出口附加值衡量的国际贸易统计数据。本文采用最终需求法,以增值出口和进口来衡量国际贸易,并根据亚洲开发银行(ADB)提供的国家间投入产出表进行计算。世界制造 "这一口号给人留下了深刻印象,但实际上,价值链很少是全球性的。相反,它们是区域性的,有三个中心。2019-2022年,"欧洲工厂"、"亚洲工厂 "和 "美洲工厂 "很容易辨认,因为全球价值链中有三个大型区域供应中心:德国、中国和美国。2020-2022 年与 2019 年相比,以中国为中心的 "亚洲工厂 "在全球价值链中的地位有所提升,而以德国为中心的 "欧洲工厂 "和以美国为中心的 "美洲工厂 "的地位则有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Global value chains before and in times of the COVID-19 pandemic Public participation in rural areas supported by regional governments in the context of sustainable rural development: The case of Poland Determinants of the success of participatory budgets in Poland Restrictions applied by WTO countries in international trade in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic The “autumn effect” in the gold market—does it contradict the Adaptive Market Hypothesis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1