Impact of different progesterone timings on live birth rates for blastocyst frozen embryo transfer cycles

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104307
{"title":"Impact of different progesterone timings on live birth rates for blastocyst frozen embryo transfer cycles","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Do different timings of progesterone administration for day 5 and day 6 blastocysts affect the live birth rate (LBR) of artificial frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included 1362 patients who underwent artificial FET cycles. The effects of 6 and 7 days of progesterone administration prior to blastocyst transfer on clinical outcomes were compared in day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were undertaken.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all patients, LBR was comparable between the two groups (51.8% versus 47.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.165). For day 6 blastocysts, after adjusting for confounders, the 7-day progesterone regimen resulted in a significantly higher LBR (44.8% versus 36.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.039, adjusted OR = 1.494, 95% CI 1.060–2.106) and lower pregnancy loss rate (15.4% versus 25.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.031, adjusted OR = 0.472, 95% CI 0.260–0.856) compared with the 6-day progesterone regimen. For day 5 blastocysts, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two regimens, but the rate of low birthweight was higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen (13.9% versus 6.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.032).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In all blastocyst analyses, no difference in LBR was found between the 6- and 7-day progesterone regimens in artificial FET cycles. For day 6 blastocysts, LBR was significantly higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen, whereas for day 5 blastocysts, pregnancy outcomes were comparable between the two regimens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324004966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question

Do different timings of progesterone administration for day 5 and day 6 blastocysts affect the live birth rate (LBR) of artificial frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles?

Design

This retrospective cohort study included 1362 patients who underwent artificial FET cycles. The effects of 6 and 7 days of progesterone administration prior to blastocyst transfer on clinical outcomes were compared in day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were undertaken.

Results

In all patients, LBR was comparable between the two groups (51.8% versus 47.9%, P = 0.165). For day 6 blastocysts, after adjusting for confounders, the 7-day progesterone regimen resulted in a significantly higher LBR (44.8% versus 36.4%, P = 0.039, adjusted OR = 1.494, 95% CI 1.060–2.106) and lower pregnancy loss rate (15.4% versus 25.2%, P = 0.031, adjusted OR = 0.472, 95% CI 0.260–0.856) compared with the 6-day progesterone regimen. For day 5 blastocysts, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two regimens, but the rate of low birthweight was higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen (13.9% versus 6.7%, P = 0.032).

Conclusions

In all blastocyst analyses, no difference in LBR was found between the 6- and 7-day progesterone regimens in artificial FET cycles. For day 6 blastocysts, LBR was significantly higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen, whereas for day 5 blastocysts, pregnancy outcomes were comparable between the two regimens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在冷冻解冻胚胎移植周期中,第 5 天和第 6 天囊胚使用不同孕酮时间对活产率的影响
研究问题对第 5 天和第 6 天囊胚注射黄体酮的不同时间是否会影响人工冷冻胚胎移植 (FET) 周期的活产率 (LBR)?比较了囊胚移植前 6 天和 7 天使用黄体酮对第 5 天和第 6 天囊胚临床结果的影响。结果 在所有患者中,两组的 LBR 值相当(51.8% 对 47.9%,P = 0.165)。对于第 6 天的囊胚,在调整了混杂因素后,7 天孕酮方案与 6 天孕酮方案相比,LBR 明显更高(44.8% 对 36.4%,P = 0.039,调整 OR = 1.494,95% CI 1.060-2.106),妊娠损失率更低(15.4% 对 25.2%,P = 0.031,调整 OR = 0.472,95% CI 0.260-0.856)。结论在所有囊胚分析中,人工 FET 周期中 6 天和 7 天孕酮方案的 LBR 没有差异。对于第 6 天的囊胚,7 天孕酮方案的 LBR 明显高于 6 天孕酮方案,而对于第 5 天的囊胚,两种方案的妊娠结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: part I. germinal vesicle model validation. Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: Part II - verification of blastocyst development from mature oocytes. Inside Front Cover - Affiliations and First page of TOC Front Matter - Continued TOC Outside Back Cover - Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1