Clinical Audits Methodology of the Radiotherapy Departments in Russian Federation Based on IAEA Audits Principles

M.V. Chernykh, T.A. Krylova
{"title":"Clinical Audits Methodology of the Radiotherapy Departments in Russian Federation Based on IAEA Audits Principles","authors":"M.V. Chernykh, T.A. Krylova","doi":"10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-3-68-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To describe the essence, tasks and algorithm of comprehensive audit in radiotherapy departments of medical institutions in Rus sian Federation. The methodology of audits conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and adapted for its further application, was used as a model. The global goal of the audit project is to standardize and harmonize procedures to ensure safety and quality control of treatment of cancer patients in different institutions, to enable comparison of radiation therapy results among participating institutions, to conduct interclinical studies and, possibly, to create a unified data register. Material and methods: One of the main aspects of clinical audits is the harmonization of standards between different departments. Clinical audits in radiotherapy can be an important tool for interclinical quality assurance (QA) program, effectiveness and safety of radiotherapy, and treatment protocols synchronization. Audits allow an in-depth analysis of the procedures and processes governing patient care in a particular clinic. Such clinical audits cover the whole chain of patients care, the organization of structural units, the infrastructure, clinical, physics and technical aspects underlying the radiotherapy department. This audit is a peer review process conducted by an audit team consisting of a radiation oncologist (RO), medical physicist (MP) and radiation technologist (RTT) and is known as QUATRO and stands for Quality Assurance Team in Radiation Oncology). Possible audit tools include: 1. Saff interviewing. 2. Examination of the structure of the entire department. 3. Review and evaluation of procedures and all relevant documentation, including analysis of patient charts. 4. Conducting independent measurements of absorbed doses and other methods of local procedures monitoring, where relevant and appropriate. 5. Observation of the practical implementation of operating procedures. Results: It was decided to use the IAEA QUATRO methodology for clinical audits and to adapt it to the specifics of radiotherapy in Russian Federation. One of the advantages of such a clinical audit is that the formalism and algorithm of this approach will be identically applied in all departments, which will allow comparing and analyzing the results. In order to obtain structured information, a detailed research protocol, which is a questionnaire, has been developed. The questions in the questionnaire allow to assess key aspects of the radiotherapy process that affect clinical outcomes and treatment efficiency.","PeriodicalId":37358,"journal":{"name":"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-3-68-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the essence, tasks and algorithm of comprehensive audit in radiotherapy departments of medical institutions in Rus sian Federation. The methodology of audits conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and adapted for its further application, was used as a model. The global goal of the audit project is to standardize and harmonize procedures to ensure safety and quality control of treatment of cancer patients in different institutions, to enable comparison of radiation therapy results among participating institutions, to conduct interclinical studies and, possibly, to create a unified data register. Material and methods: One of the main aspects of clinical audits is the harmonization of standards between different departments. Clinical audits in radiotherapy can be an important tool for interclinical quality assurance (QA) program, effectiveness and safety of radiotherapy, and treatment protocols synchronization. Audits allow an in-depth analysis of the procedures and processes governing patient care in a particular clinic. Such clinical audits cover the whole chain of patients care, the organization of structural units, the infrastructure, clinical, physics and technical aspects underlying the radiotherapy department. This audit is a peer review process conducted by an audit team consisting of a radiation oncologist (RO), medical physicist (MP) and radiation technologist (RTT) and is known as QUATRO and stands for Quality Assurance Team in Radiation Oncology). Possible audit tools include: 1. Saff interviewing. 2. Examination of the structure of the entire department. 3. Review and evaluation of procedures and all relevant documentation, including analysis of patient charts. 4. Conducting independent measurements of absorbed doses and other methods of local procedures monitoring, where relevant and appropriate. 5. Observation of the practical implementation of operating procedures. Results: It was decided to use the IAEA QUATRO methodology for clinical audits and to adapt it to the specifics of radiotherapy in Russian Federation. One of the advantages of such a clinical audit is that the formalism and algorithm of this approach will be identically applied in all departments, which will allow comparing and analyzing the results. In order to obtain structured information, a detailed research protocol, which is a questionnaire, has been developed. The questions in the questionnaire allow to assess key aspects of the radiotherapy process that affect clinical outcomes and treatment efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于国际原子能机构审计原则的俄罗斯联邦放射治疗科临床审计方法
目的:描述俄罗斯联邦医疗机构放射治疗部门全面审计的实质、任务和算法。以国际原子能机构(IAEA)开展的审计方法为范本,并对其进行调整以进一步应用。审计项目的总体目标是实现程序的标准化和统一化,以确保不同机构对癌症患者的治疗安全和质量控制,使参与机构之间能够比较放射治疗结果,开展临床间研究,并在可能的情况下建立统一的数据登记册。材料和方法:临床审计的一个主要方面是协调不同部门之间的标准。放疗临床审核是临床间质量保证(QA)计划、放疗有效性和安全性以及治疗方案同步化的重要工具。通过审核,可以深入分析特定诊所的病人护理程序和流程。这种临床审核涵盖病人护理的整个链条、结构单元的组织、放射治疗部门的基础设施、临床、物理和技术方面。这种审核是由放射肿瘤学家(RO)、医学物理学家(MP)和放射技术专家(RTT)组成的审核小组进行的同行评审过程,被称为 QUATRO(放射肿瘤质量保证小组的缩写)。可能的审计工具包括1.萨夫访谈。2.检查整个部门的结构。3.审查和评估程序及所有相关文件,包括分析病历。4.在相关和适当的情况下,对吸收剂量进行独立测量,并采用其他方法对局部程序进行监测。5.观察操作程序的实际执行情况。结果:决定采用国际原子能机构的 QUATRO 方法进行临床审核,并根据俄罗斯联邦放射治疗的具体情况进行调整。这种临床审核的优点之一是,这种方法的形式和算法在所有科室的应用都是相同的,因此可以对结果进行比较和分析。为了获得结构化信息,我们制定了详细的研究方案,即调查问卷。问卷中的问题可用于评估放射治疗过程中影响临床效果和治疗效率的关键环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Radiation Risk of Death from Cardiovascular Diseases among the Liquidators Involved in the Cleaning up of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident – Workers in the Nuclear Industry Sector The Mitochondrial 18 kDa Translocator Protein as a Biomarker of Radiation-Induced Neuroinflammatory In Memory of Radiotoxicologist Yuri Alexandrovich Klassovsky for the 100th Anniversary of his Birth on 01/15/1924–04/27/1982 The Importance of SPECT/CT in Simultaneous Assessment of Calcinosis of Coronary Arteries, Perfusion and Contractile Function of the Myocardium among Men’s with Coronary Heart Disease Study of Clinical, Hematologic and Immunologic Parameters in Assessing the Anti-Radiation Efficacy of the Therapeutic Agent Based on the Microorganism Fusobacterium Necrophorum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1