Complications of temporomandibular joint arthroscopy. A critical appraisal of the literature

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.018
{"title":"Complications of temporomandibular joint arthroscopy. A critical appraisal of the literature","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To search for the best available scientific evidence in relation to the reported overall and selective complication rates for arthroscopic surgery<span> in patients presenting with internal derangement (ID) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).</span></div><div>A comprehensive electronic search was conducted without data or language restrictions up to August 2023. Inclusion criteria were the following: study in humans, randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials<span> (CCTs), cohort studies<span> and series of clinical cases. The proposed PICOS question was: “In clinical trials<span> and retrospective clinical series of patients treated by arthroscopy, which were the overall and selective complication rates?” Exclusion criteria were animal studies, review papers, technical reports, and in vitro studies. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies in terms of their quality. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) classification was used to determine the level of evidence of the selected studies.</span></span></span></div><div><span>A total of 498 studies were identified. Of these, 16 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for qualitative assessment. Temporary 5th nerve deficit, ranging from 0.15% to 2.38%, was reported to occur in most larger series, comprising 7394 operated joints. Temporary 7th nerve paresis was reported to occur in 0.21%–0.7% in the largest series, comprising 6866 operated joints. </span>Partial hearing loss<span> was reported in 6 studies, ranging from 0.21% to 2.2% in 5845 operated joints. Edema of surrounding soft tissues, including parapharyngeal, soft palate and/or preauricular edema was reported in 8 studies, with complication rates ranging from 2% to 17.9% in 2274 operated joints. Laceration of the EAC was reported in 8 studies involving 2665 operated joints, with complication rates ranging from 0.3% to 6%. A total of 872 complicated events among 11,304 operated joints were reported, accounting for an overall complication rate of 7.71%.</span></div><div>Complications from arthroscopic procedures have been inconsistently reported, but there are a small number of retrospective studies with well-reported complications rates. As overall complication rate accounts for less than 8% of the cases, arthroscopy seems to be a highly safe procedure for the treatment of internal derangement (ID) of the TMJ. Due to the absence of studies with high evidence, information for patients about complications should be based on clinical series of cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"52 10","pages":"Pages 1122-1132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To search for the best available scientific evidence in relation to the reported overall and selective complication rates for arthroscopic surgery in patients presenting with internal derangement (ID) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
A comprehensive electronic search was conducted without data or language restrictions up to August 2023. Inclusion criteria were the following: study in humans, randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), cohort studies and series of clinical cases. The proposed PICOS question was: “In clinical trials and retrospective clinical series of patients treated by arthroscopy, which were the overall and selective complication rates?” Exclusion criteria were animal studies, review papers, technical reports, and in vitro studies. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies in terms of their quality. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) classification was used to determine the level of evidence of the selected studies.
A total of 498 studies were identified. Of these, 16 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for qualitative assessment. Temporary 5th nerve deficit, ranging from 0.15% to 2.38%, was reported to occur in most larger series, comprising 7394 operated joints. Temporary 7th nerve paresis was reported to occur in 0.21%–0.7% in the largest series, comprising 6866 operated joints. Partial hearing loss was reported in 6 studies, ranging from 0.21% to 2.2% in 5845 operated joints. Edema of surrounding soft tissues, including parapharyngeal, soft palate and/or preauricular edema was reported in 8 studies, with complication rates ranging from 2% to 17.9% in 2274 operated joints. Laceration of the EAC was reported in 8 studies involving 2665 operated joints, with complication rates ranging from 0.3% to 6%. A total of 872 complicated events among 11,304 operated joints were reported, accounting for an overall complication rate of 7.71%.
Complications from arthroscopic procedures have been inconsistently reported, but there are a small number of retrospective studies with well-reported complications rates. As overall complication rate accounts for less than 8% of the cases, arthroscopy seems to be a highly safe procedure for the treatment of internal derangement (ID) of the TMJ. Due to the absence of studies with high evidence, information for patients about complications should be based on clinical series of cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞下颌关节镜手术并发症。文献批判性评估。
目的:搜索与颞下颌关节(TMJ)内失调(ID)患者关节镜手术的总体和选择性并发症发生率相关的现有最佳科学证据。纳入标准如下:人体研究、随机或准随机对照试验(RCT)、临床对照试验(CCT)、队列研究和临床病例系列。提出的 PICOS 问题是"在关节镜治疗患者的临床试验和回顾性临床系列研究中,总体和选择性并发症的发生率是多少?排除标准为动物研究、综述论文、技术报告和体外研究。Cochrane 协作工具用于评估纳入研究在质量方面的偏倚风险。推荐强度分类法(SORT)用于确定所选研究的证据级别。其中,16 项研究符合纳入标准,并被选中进行定性评估。据报道,在大多数较大的系列研究(包括 7394 个手术关节)中都出现了暂时性第 5 神经缺损,比例从 0.15% 到 2.38% 不等。据报道,在包括 6866 个手术关节在内的最大系列中,暂时性第 7 神经麻痹的发生率为 0.21%-0.7%。6项研究报告了部分听力损失,在5845个手术关节中占0.21%至2.2%。8项研究报告了周围软组织水肿,包括咽旁、软腭和/或耳前水肿,并发症发生率在2274个手术关节中从2%到17.9%不等。8项研究报告了EAC的撕裂,涉及2665个手术关节,并发症发生率从0.3%到6%不等。在11304个接受手术的关节中,共报告了872例并发症,总并发症发生率为7.71%。由于总体并发症发生率低于 8%,因此关节镜手术似乎是治疗颞下颌关节内错位(ID)的高度安全手术。由于缺乏证据确凿的研究,有关并发症的信息应以临床系列病例为基础提供给患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
期刊最新文献
Radiographic findings predictive of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A minimally invasive modified revolving-door flap for surgical reconstruction of concha and antihelix defects. Complications following open treatment of frontal sinus fracture: A nationwide analysis of 1492 patients. Free-floating bone flap posterior cranial vault release in syndromic craniosynostosis. Investigating determinants of surgical success in excising basal cell and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: A single-center retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1