Compliance of Australian commercial foods for young children (<36 months) with an international nutrient and promotion profile model

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100158
Maree Scully , Rachael Jinnette , Linh Le , Jane Martin , Andrea Schmidtke
{"title":"Compliance of Australian commercial foods for young children (<36 months) with an international nutrient and promotion profile model","authors":"Maree Scully ,&nbsp;Rachael Jinnette ,&nbsp;Linh Le ,&nbsp;Jane Martin ,&nbsp;Andrea Schmidtke","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess how Australian infant and toddler foods compare to a nutrient and promotion profile model (NPPM) developed by the World Health Organization to support the appropriate promotion of commercial food products for children aged 6-36 months.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional audit of infant and toddler foods found at three major Australian supermarkets was conducted in September/October 2022. Using nutrition and promotional data extracted from the packaging, products were classified according to NPPM categories and assessed against relevant compositional, front-of-pack labelling and promotional requirements.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 330 eligible products identified, just 28% met all NPPM compositional requirements. Toddler foods were less compliant than infant foods overall (18% vs. 31%; <em>p</em>=0.021), and for specific nutrients such as sodium (75% vs. 89%; <em>p</em>=0.003). No products met all NPPM front-of-pack labelling/promotional requirements. Only two-thirds and two-fifths of products were compliant with product name and ingredient list requirements, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Australian infant and toddler foods do not fully comply with the NPPM requirements. While toddler foods performed comparatively worse in terms of their nutritional adequacy, there is considerable scope to improve the nutrient profile of both infant and toddler foods.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>To better support young children’s health and development, the introduction of mandatory nutrition standards for Australian toddler foods, and the improvement of nutrition standards for Australian infant foods, in line with the NPPM, is needed. To be most effective, these should be combined with regulations for the labelling and promotion of these foods in line with the NPPM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 3","pages":"Article 100158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000335/pdfft?md5=ab8a4023bada908302ffab6e5c6b860e&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000335-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess how Australian infant and toddler foods compare to a nutrient and promotion profile model (NPPM) developed by the World Health Organization to support the appropriate promotion of commercial food products for children aged 6-36 months.

Methods

A cross-sectional audit of infant and toddler foods found at three major Australian supermarkets was conducted in September/October 2022. Using nutrition and promotional data extracted from the packaging, products were classified according to NPPM categories and assessed against relevant compositional, front-of-pack labelling and promotional requirements.

Results

Of 330 eligible products identified, just 28% met all NPPM compositional requirements. Toddler foods were less compliant than infant foods overall (18% vs. 31%; p=0.021), and for specific nutrients such as sodium (75% vs. 89%; p=0.003). No products met all NPPM front-of-pack labelling/promotional requirements. Only two-thirds and two-fifths of products were compliant with product name and ingredient list requirements, respectively.

Conclusion

Australian infant and toddler foods do not fully comply with the NPPM requirements. While toddler foods performed comparatively worse in terms of their nutritional adequacy, there is considerable scope to improve the nutrient profile of both infant and toddler foods.

Implications for public health

To better support young children’s health and development, the introduction of mandatory nutrition standards for Australian toddler foods, and the improvement of nutrition standards for Australian infant foods, in line with the NPPM, is needed. To be most effective, these should be combined with regulations for the labelling and promotion of these foods in line with the NPPM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚幼儿(小于 36 个月)商业食品是否符合国际营养素和宣传资料模型。
目标:评估澳大利亚婴幼儿食品与世界卫生组织开发的营养素和推广模式(NPPM)的比较情况,该模式旨在支持为6-36个月大的儿童适当推广商业食品:方法:2022 年 9 月/10 月,对澳大利亚三大超市的婴幼儿食品进行了横向审核。利用从包装中提取的营养和促销数据,按照《国家婴幼儿食品标准》对产品进行分类,并根据相关成分、包装正面标签和促销要求对产品进行评估:结果:在确定的 330 种合格产品中,仅有 28% 符合所有 NPPM 成分要求。幼儿食品的总体达标率低于婴儿食品(18% 对 31%;p=0.021),在钠等特定营养素方面的达标率也低于婴儿食品(75% 对 89%;p=0.003)。没有任何产品符合《国家产品包装正面标签管理规范》的所有包装正面标签/促销要求。分别只有三分之二和五分之二的产品符合产品名称和配料表要求:结论:澳大利亚的婴幼儿食品并不完全符合 NPPM 的要求。幼儿食品在营养充足性方面的表现相对较差,但婴幼儿食品的营养成分还有很大的改善空间:为了更好地支持幼儿的健康和发展,有必要根据《国家营养标准》对澳大利亚幼儿食品实行强制性营养标准,并改进澳大利亚婴儿食品的营养标准。为达到最佳效果,这些标准应与符合《国家营养标准》的这些食品的标签和促销法规相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Preliminary evaluation of a novel Aboriginal community-controlled prison health service for First Nations people. A cross-sectional study of the experiences of distressed callers when accessing financial assistance from a telephone-based cancer information and support service Increasing awareness of sexually transmitted infections (STI) testing and addressing stigma may improve STI testing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth: Evidence from the Next Generation Youth Wellbeing Study Psychedelic medicine and cultural responsiveness: A call for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement in Australian clinical trials and practice An evaluation of the population uptake and contact tracer utilisation of the Covid-19 Bluetooth Exposure Notification Framework in New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1