Lipid-lowering therapies and long-term stroke prevention in East Asians: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY International Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1177/17474930241264686
Bao-Qiang Guo, Hong-Bin Li, Peng-Wei Xu, Bing Zhao
{"title":"Lipid-lowering therapies and long-term stroke prevention in East Asians: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Bao-Qiang Guo, Hong-Bin Li, Peng-Wei Xu, Bing Zhao","doi":"10.1177/17474930241264686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke prevention is a pressing global health priority, with reducing elevated lipids recognized as a key strategy. East Asians, constituting more than 1.6 billion individuals and the largest racial group worldwide, are a key demographic in this effort. Yet, the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies for stroke prevention in this population remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 3 years of follow-up to evaluate the long-term impact of lipid-lowering therapies on stroke incidence in East Asians. We systematically searched four electronic databases up to 11 January 2024. The association was quantified using relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic. In addition, we utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to assess the risk of bias in each included RCT and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study incorporated data from nine large-scale RCTs involving 54,354 participants. Our findings of overall analyses revealed that lipid-lowering therapies did not significantly affect the long-term incidence of all strokes (9 RCTs; 54,354 participants; RR = 0.98 (95% CI = 0.87-1.10); <i>P</i> = 0.75), ischemic stroke (7 RCTs; 52,059 participants; RR = 0.91 (95% CI, = 0.79-1.04); <i>P</i> = 0.16), or hemorrhage stroke (7 RCTs; 52,059 participants; RR = 1.24 (95% CI = 0.97-1.59); <i>P</i> = 0.09) in East Asians. Notably, there was no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias, and the quality of evidence assessed using GRADE methodologies was rated as high. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our results, with no single study significantly affecting the overall findings. Furthermore, subgroup analyses consistently supported the conclusions, further bolstering the reliability of our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lipid-lowering therapies did not demonstrate any beneficial effects on long-term stroke prevention among East Asians.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930241264686"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241264686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke prevention is a pressing global health priority, with reducing elevated lipids recognized as a key strategy. East Asians, constituting more than 1.6 billion individuals and the largest racial group worldwide, are a key demographic in this effort. Yet, the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies for stroke prevention in this population remains uncertain.

Aims and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 3 years of follow-up to evaluate the long-term impact of lipid-lowering therapies on stroke incidence in East Asians. We systematically searched four electronic databases up to 11 January 2024. The association was quantified using relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. In addition, we utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to assess the risk of bias in each included RCT and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.

Results: This study incorporated data from nine large-scale RCTs involving 54,354 participants. Our findings of overall analyses revealed that lipid-lowering therapies did not significantly affect the long-term incidence of all strokes (9 RCTs; 54,354 participants; RR = 0.98 (95% CI = 0.87-1.10); P = 0.75), ischemic stroke (7 RCTs; 52,059 participants; RR = 0.91 (95% CI, = 0.79-1.04); P = 0.16), or hemorrhage stroke (7 RCTs; 52,059 participants; RR = 1.24 (95% CI = 0.97-1.59); P = 0.09) in East Asians. Notably, there was no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias, and the quality of evidence assessed using GRADE methodologies was rated as high. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our results, with no single study significantly affecting the overall findings. Furthermore, subgroup analyses consistently supported the conclusions, further bolstering the reliability of our study.

Conclusions: Lipid-lowering therapies did not demonstrate any beneficial effects on long-term stroke prevention among East Asians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东亚人的降脂疗法和长期中风预防:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:预防中风是全球健康领域的当务之急,降低血脂升高被认为是一项关键策略。东亚人超过 16 亿,是全球最大的种族群体,是这项工作的关键人群。然而,降脂疗法对该人群预防中风的有效性仍不确定:我们对至少随访 3 年的大规模随机对照试验 (RCT) 进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估降脂疗法对东亚人中风发病率的长期影响。我们系统检索了截至 2024 年 1 月 11 日的四个电子数据库。相关性采用相对风险 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 进行量化,研究间异质性采用 I2 统计量进行评估。此外,我们还利用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了每项纳入的 RCT 的偏倚风险,并采用 GRADE 方法评估了证据的确定性:本研究纳入了 9 项大规模 RCT 的数据,涉及 54,354 名参与者。我们的总体分析结果显示,降脂疗法对所有脑卒中(9 项 RCTs;54354 名参与者;RR,0.98 [95% CI,0.87-1.10];P = 0.75)、缺血性中风(7 项研究;52059 名参与者;RR,0.91 [95% CI,0.79-1.04];P = 0.16)或出血性中风(7 项研究;52059 名参与者;RR,1.24 [95% CI,0.97-1.59];P = 0.09)。值得注意的是,没有证据表明存在异质性或发表偏倚,使用 GRADE 方法评估的证据质量被评为较高。敏感性分析证实了我们结果的稳健性,没有任何一项研究会对总体结果产生重大影响。此外,亚组分析始终支持我们的结论,进一步增强了我们研究的可靠性:结论:在东亚人中,降脂疗法并未显示出对长期预防中风有任何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
期刊最新文献
International practice patterns and perspectives on endovascular therapy for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis. How tube feeding modes influence anxiety in patients with dysphagia after ischemic stroke: A propensity score-matched, longitudinal study. Risk of long-term post-stroke dementia using a linked dataset of patients with ischemic stroke without a history of dementia. Real-world comparison of dual versus single antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-cardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke: A propensity matched analysis. Transient brain ischemic symptoms and the presence of ischemic lesions at neuroimaging: Results from the READAPT study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1