Barriers to Modern Contraceptive Use by Female Workers in Indonesia's Urban Areas.

IF 1.4 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Korean Journal of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.4082/kjfm.24.0005
Agung Dwi Laksono, Ratna Dwi Wulandari, Ratu Matahari, Yuly Astuti, Eti Rimawati
{"title":"Barriers to Modern Contraceptive Use by Female Workers in Indonesia's Urban Areas.","authors":"Agung Dwi Laksono, Ratna Dwi Wulandari, Ratu Matahari, Yuly Astuti, Eti Rimawati","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.24.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female workers in Indonesia are vulnerable, because they must work to earn a living while still being responsible for domestic problems. This study analyzes the barriers to the use of modern contraceptives by female workers in Indonesia's urban areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey looked at 21,696 female workers. We used modern contraceptive use as a dependent variable, and age, education, wealth, known modern contraceptives, number of live births, ideal number of children, and insurance ownership as independent variables. In the final test, we employed binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that women at all age categories were more likely than those aged 15-19 years not to use modern contraceptives, except those aged 35-39 years, who showed no difference. All other marital types were more likely to use modern contraceptives than married individuals. Rich female workers were 1.139 times more likely than poor workers not to use modern contraceptives (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.139; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.026-1.264). Female workers who did not know about modern contraceptives were 4.549 times more likely than those who did not to use modern contraceptives (AOR, 4.549; 95% CI, 1.037-19.953). Female workers with more than two children were 9.996 times more likely than those with two or fewer children not to use modern contraceptives (AOR, 9.996; 95% CI, 9.1890-10.875).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified five factors associated with the non-use of modern contraceptives by female workers in Indonesia's urban areas: young, unmarried, rich, did not know about modern contraceptives, and had more than two children.</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.24.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Female workers in Indonesia are vulnerable, because they must work to earn a living while still being responsible for domestic problems. This study analyzes the barriers to the use of modern contraceptives by female workers in Indonesia's urban areas.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey looked at 21,696 female workers. We used modern contraceptive use as a dependent variable, and age, education, wealth, known modern contraceptives, number of live births, ideal number of children, and insurance ownership as independent variables. In the final test, we employed binary logistic regression.

Results: The results showed that women at all age categories were more likely than those aged 15-19 years not to use modern contraceptives, except those aged 35-39 years, who showed no difference. All other marital types were more likely to use modern contraceptives than married individuals. Rich female workers were 1.139 times more likely than poor workers not to use modern contraceptives (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.139; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.026-1.264). Female workers who did not know about modern contraceptives were 4.549 times more likely than those who did not to use modern contraceptives (AOR, 4.549; 95% CI, 1.037-19.953). Female workers with more than two children were 9.996 times more likely than those with two or fewer children not to use modern contraceptives (AOR, 9.996; 95% CI, 9.1890-10.875).

Conclusion: This study identified five factors associated with the non-use of modern contraceptives by female workers in Indonesia's urban areas: young, unmarried, rich, did not know about modern contraceptives, and had more than two children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚城市地区女工使用现代避孕药具的障碍。
背景:印度尼西亚的女工是弱势群体,因为她们既要工作谋生,又要承担家庭问题。本研究分析了印尼城市地区女工使用现代避孕药具的障碍:这项横断面调查涉及 21,696 名女工。我们将现代避孕药具的使用作为因变量,将年龄、教育程度、财富、已知的现代避孕药具、活产数、理想子女数和保险拥有量作为自变量。在最终检验中,我们采用了二元逻辑回归法:结果表明,除 35-39 岁的妇女没有差异外,所有年龄段的妇女都比 15-19 岁的妇女更有可能不使用现代避孕药具。所有其他婚姻类型的人都比已婚者更有可能使用现代避孕药具。富裕女工不使用现代避孕药具的几率是贫穷女工的 1.139 倍(调整后的几率比 [AOR],1.139;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.026-1.264)。不了解现代避孕药具的女工使用现代避孕药具的可能性是不了解现代避孕药具的女工的 4.549 倍(AOR,4.549;95% 置信区间,1.037-19.953)。有两个以上子女的女工不使用现代避孕药具的可能性是有两个或以下子女的女工的 9.996 倍(AOR,9.996;95% CI,9.1890-10.875):本研究发现了与印尼城市地区女工不使用现代避孕药具相关的五个因素:年轻、未婚、富有、不了解现代避孕药具以及有两个以上子女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the Prevalence and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in South Korea Using a Large National Dataset. Low Bone Mineral Density Is Associated with High-Frequency Hearing Impairment in Women Over 50: An Observational Study in Korea. Effect of Electronic Cigarettes on the Change of Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Scores during 1-Year Follow-up. Unhealthy Alcohol Use: Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions. Usefulness of Glycated Albumin Levels in Predicting the Maternal or Neonatal Complications of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus during Late Pregnancy in South Korea: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1