Murdering the person closest to you: Similarities and differences between intimate partner sexual homicide and non-intimate partner sexual homicide

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Behavioral Sciences & the Law Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1002/bsl.2680
Marie Czarnietzki, Sophia Ricono-Kaufhold, Rajan Darjee, Michael Davis, Aleshia Nanev
{"title":"Murdering the person closest to you: Similarities and differences between intimate partner sexual homicide and non-intimate partner sexual homicide","authors":"Marie Czarnietzki,&nbsp;Sophia Ricono-Kaufhold,&nbsp;Rajan Darjee,&nbsp;Michael Davis,&nbsp;Aleshia Nanev","doi":"10.1002/bsl.2680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sexual homicides (SHs) demand nuanced research for effective prevention, treatment, risk assessment and theoretical insights. Intimate-partner sexual homicides (IPSHs), comprising approximately 20% of SHs, have received limited attention. This study compares IPSHs (<i>n</i> = 56) and non-intimate partner sexual homicides (NIPSHs) (<i>n</i> = 236) in Australia and New Zealand by investigating offender, victim, and crime-scene characteristics. While IPSH perpetrators were typically older, separated, and had prior domestic violence convictions, victims were more often non-white with histories of domestic violence and substance use. Although crime-scene locations and post-offence behaviours differed, similar crime scene behaviours were displayed across offender groups, which seemed to be routed in different underlying motives. Whereas drivers of IPSH commonly were grievance and anger, associated with offences occurring after arguments, drivers for NIPSH were more often sexual deviance and sadism. Overall, IPSH encompasses aspects of domestic violence, homicide, and sexual violence, distinguishing it from SH.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsl.2680","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsl.2680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual homicides (SHs) demand nuanced research for effective prevention, treatment, risk assessment and theoretical insights. Intimate-partner sexual homicides (IPSHs), comprising approximately 20% of SHs, have received limited attention. This study compares IPSHs (n = 56) and non-intimate partner sexual homicides (NIPSHs) (n = 236) in Australia and New Zealand by investigating offender, victim, and crime-scene characteristics. While IPSH perpetrators were typically older, separated, and had prior domestic violence convictions, victims were more often non-white with histories of domestic violence and substance use. Although crime-scene locations and post-offence behaviours differed, similar crime scene behaviours were displayed across offender groups, which seemed to be routed in different underlying motives. Whereas drivers of IPSH commonly were grievance and anger, associated with offences occurring after arguments, drivers for NIPSH were more often sexual deviance and sadism. Overall, IPSH encompasses aspects of domestic violence, homicide, and sexual violence, distinguishing it from SH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谋杀最亲近的人:亲密伴侣性杀人与非亲密伴侣性杀人的异同。
性凶杀(SHs)需要细致入微的研究,以进行有效的预防、治疗、风险评估和理论探讨。亲密伴侣性凶杀案(IPSH)约占性凶杀案的 20%,但受到的关注却很有限。本研究通过调查犯罪者、受害者和犯罪现场特征,比较了澳大利亚和新西兰的亲密伴侣性杀人案件(IPSHs)(n = 56)和非亲密伴侣性杀人案件(NIPSHs)(n = 236)。IPSH 犯罪者通常年龄较大、分居、有家庭暴力前科,而受害者多为非白人,有家庭暴力史和药物使用史。虽然犯罪现场的位置和犯罪后的行为各不相同,但不同犯罪人群体在犯罪现场的行为却相似,这似乎源于不同的潜在动机。IPSH的驱动因素通常是委屈和愤怒,与争吵后发生的犯罪有关,而NIPSH的驱动因素则更多地是性变态和虐待狂。总体而言,IPSH 包含家庭暴力、杀人和性暴力的各个方面,有别于 SH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Survey of change-of-venue motions in appellate court transcripts of murder trials (2000-2020): Which factors make a difference? Are risk assessment tools more accurate than unstructured judgments in predicting violent, any, and sexual offending? A meta-analysis of direct comparison studies. Poly-bullying victimisation in Indonesia: Prevalence and factors related to children exposure to multiple bullying incidents, and its correlation to subjective well-being. Issue Information Parental involvement in school and school victimization in Taiwan: The mediating role of quality of student-teacher relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1