Does perceived greenwashing promote or inhibit ethical voice? Effects of moral disengagement and perceived competitive pressure

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114793
Yilin Xiang, Lu Chen, Zhenya Zhang, Xinyu Sun
{"title":"Does perceived greenwashing promote or inhibit ethical voice? Effects of moral disengagement and perceived competitive pressure","authors":"Yilin Xiang,&nbsp;Lu Chen,&nbsp;Zhenya Zhang,&nbsp;Xinyu Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on the social cognitive theory of morality and considering employees’ perspectives, we build and test a mediated moderation model in which perceived greenwashing interacts with perceived inter-organizational competitive pressure to affect ethical voice through moral disengagement. We conducted a multisource time-lagged organizational field survey (Study 1) and two vignette-based experiments (Study 2 and 3) to test our hypotheses. Results show that perceived greenwashing negatively (positively) affects ethical voice through moral disengagement under high (low) perceptions of competitive pressure. Studies have indicated that when employees feel that their organizations are under greater competitive pressure, stress may cause them to suppress their objections to greenwashing through moral disengagement. These findings have implications for the social cognitive theory of morality and managers who aim to encourage ethical voice and discourage moral disengagement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324002972","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the social cognitive theory of morality and considering employees’ perspectives, we build and test a mediated moderation model in which perceived greenwashing interacts with perceived inter-organizational competitive pressure to affect ethical voice through moral disengagement. We conducted a multisource time-lagged organizational field survey (Study 1) and two vignette-based experiments (Study 2 and 3) to test our hypotheses. Results show that perceived greenwashing negatively (positively) affects ethical voice through moral disengagement under high (low) perceptions of competitive pressure. Studies have indicated that when employees feel that their organizations are under greater competitive pressure, stress may cause them to suppress their objections to greenwashing through moral disengagement. These findings have implications for the social cognitive theory of morality and managers who aim to encourage ethical voice and discourage moral disengagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知到的 "洗绿 "会促进还是抑制道德声音?道德脱离和感知竞争压力的影响
基于道德的社会认知理论并考虑到员工的观点,我们建立并测试了一个中介调节模型,在该模型中,感知到的绿色清洗与感知到的组织间竞争压力相互作用,通过道德脱离影响道德声音。我们开展了一项多源时滞组织实地调查(研究 1)和两个基于小插曲的实验(研究 2 和 3)来验证我们的假设。结果表明,在竞争压力较高(较低)的情况下,感知到的 "绿色清洗 "会通过道德脱离对道德声音产生负面(正面)影响。研究表明,当员工认为其所在组织面临更大的竞争压力时,压力可能会导致他们通过道德脱离来压制自己对 "洗绿 "的反对意见。这些研究结果对道德的社会认知理论以及旨在鼓励道德声音和阻止道德脱离的管理者都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Energy Performance of Building Refurbishments: Predictive and Prescriptive AI-based Machine Learning Approaches Digital transformation along the supply chain: Spillover effects from vertical partnerships Bridging consumption and work: The effects of thoughts about different types of purchases on job-related motivations A meta-analytic investigation into the pay-it-forward phenomenon: The roles of individualism-collectivism and social distance The more, the better: The influence of overconfident CEOs on their firms’ digital orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1