Natural Variability Can Mask Forced Permafrost Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection in the ARISE-SAI-1.5 Simulations

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI:10.1029/2023EF004191
A. L. Morrison, E. A. Barnes, J. W. Hurrell
{"title":"Natural Variability Can Mask Forced Permafrost Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection in the ARISE-SAI-1.5 Simulations","authors":"A. L. Morrison,&nbsp;E. A. Barnes,&nbsp;J. W. Hurrell","doi":"10.1029/2023EF004191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a potential method for mitigating risks and impacts associated with anthropogenic climate change. One such risk is widespread permafrost thaw and associated carbon release. While permafrost has been shown to stabilize under different SAI scenarios, natural variability may mask this forced response and make it difficult to detect if and when SAI is stabilizing permafrost. Here we use the 10-member ensemble from the ARISE-SAI-1.5 simulations to assess the spread in projected active layer depth and permafrost temperature across boreal permafrost soils and specifically in four peatland and Yedoma regions. The forced response in active layer depth and permafrost temperature quickly diverges between an SAI and non-SAI world, but individual ensemble members overlap for several years following SAI deployment. We find that, due to projected permafrost variability, it may take more than a decade of SAI deployment to detect the effects of SAI on permafrost temperature and almost 30 years to detect its effects on active layer depth. Not only does natural variability make it more difficult to detect SAI's influence, it could also affect the likelihood of reaching a permafrost tipping point. In some realizations, SAI fails to prevent a local tipping point that is also reached in a non-SAI world. Our results underscore the importance of accounting for natural variability in assessments of SAI's potential influence on the climate system.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023EF004191","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023EF004191","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a potential method for mitigating risks and impacts associated with anthropogenic climate change. One such risk is widespread permafrost thaw and associated carbon release. While permafrost has been shown to stabilize under different SAI scenarios, natural variability may mask this forced response and make it difficult to detect if and when SAI is stabilizing permafrost. Here we use the 10-member ensemble from the ARISE-SAI-1.5 simulations to assess the spread in projected active layer depth and permafrost temperature across boreal permafrost soils and specifically in four peatland and Yedoma regions. The forced response in active layer depth and permafrost temperature quickly diverges between an SAI and non-SAI world, but individual ensemble members overlap for several years following SAI deployment. We find that, due to projected permafrost variability, it may take more than a decade of SAI deployment to detect the effects of SAI on permafrost temperature and almost 30 years to detect its effects on active layer depth. Not only does natural variability make it more difficult to detect SAI's influence, it could also affect the likelihood of reaching a permafrost tipping point. In some realizations, SAI fails to prevent a local tipping point that is also reached in a non-SAI world. Our results underscore the importance of accounting for natural variability in assessments of SAI's potential influence on the climate system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 ARISE-SAI-1.5 模拟中,自然变异会掩盖强迫冻土层对平流层气溶胶注入的响应
平流层气溶胶注入(SAI)被认为是减轻与人为气候变化相关的风险和影响的一种潜在方法。其中一个风险是大面积的永久冻土融化和相关的碳释放。虽然在不同的 SAI 情景下,永久冻土已被证明趋于稳定,但自然变异可能会掩盖这种被迫反应,从而难以检测 SAI 是否以及何时使永久冻土趋于稳定。在这里,我们使用 ARISE-SAI-1.5 模拟的 10 个成员集合来评估整个北方冻土带,特别是四个泥炭地和叶多玛地区的预计活动层深度和冻土温度的分布。在 SAI 和非 SAI 世界中,活动层深度和冻土温度的强迫响应很快就会出现分歧,但在 SAI 部署后的几年中,各个集合成员会出现重叠。我们发现,由于预计的永久冻土变异性,可能需要部署 SAI 十多年才能检测到 SAI 对永久冻土温度的影响,需要近 30 年才能检测到 SAI 对活动层深度的影响。自然变化不仅会增加检测 SAI 影响的难度,还会影响达到冻土临界点的可能性。在某些情况下,SAI 无法阻止局部临界点的出现,而在非 SAI 的世界中,该临界点也会出现。我们的研究结果强调了在评估 SAI 对气候系统的潜在影响时考虑自然变异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
期刊最新文献
A Nationwide Analysis of Community-Level Floodplain Development Outcomes and Key Influences Intensification and Changing Spatial Extent of Heavy Rainfall in Urban Areas Global Wetland Methane Emissions From 2001 to 2020: Magnitude, Dynamics and Controls Cyclone Gabrielle as a Design Storm for Northeastern Aotearoa New Zealand Under Anthropogenic Warming Variations in Rainfall Structure of Western North Pacific Landfalling Tropical Cyclones in the Warming Climates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1