Prenatal exposure to particulate matter and infant birth outcomes: Evidence from a population-wide database

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Health economics Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1002/hec.4862
Babak Jahanshahi, Brian Johnston, Mark E. McGovern, Duncan McVicar, Dermot O’Reilly, Neil Rowland, Stavros Vlachos
{"title":"Prenatal exposure to particulate matter and infant birth outcomes: Evidence from a population-wide database","authors":"Babak Jahanshahi,&nbsp;Brian Johnston,&nbsp;Mark E. McGovern,&nbsp;Duncan McVicar,&nbsp;Dermot O’Reilly,&nbsp;Neil Rowland,&nbsp;Stavros Vlachos","doi":"10.1002/hec.4862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are growing concerns about the impact of pollution on maternal and infant health. Despite an extensive correlational literature, observational studies which adopt methods that seek to address potential biases due to unmeasured confounders draw mixed conclusions. Using a population database of births in Northern Ireland (NI) linked to localized geographic information on pollution in mothers' postcodes (zipcodes) of residence during pregnancy, we examine whether prenatal exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> is associated with a comprehensive range of birth outcomes, including placental health. Overall, we find little evidence that particulate matter is related to infant outcomes at the pollution levels experienced in NI, once we implement a mother fixed effects approach that accounts for time-invariant factors. This contrasts with strong associations in models that adjust for observed confounders but without fixed effects. While reducing ambient air pollution remains an urgent public health priority globally, our results imply that further improvements in short-run levels of prenatal PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure in a relatively low-pollution, higher-income country context, are unlikely to impact on birth outcomes at the population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"33 9","pages":"2182-2200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.4862","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are growing concerns about the impact of pollution on maternal and infant health. Despite an extensive correlational literature, observational studies which adopt methods that seek to address potential biases due to unmeasured confounders draw mixed conclusions. Using a population database of births in Northern Ireland (NI) linked to localized geographic information on pollution in mothers' postcodes (zipcodes) of residence during pregnancy, we examine whether prenatal exposure to PM2.5 is associated with a comprehensive range of birth outcomes, including placental health. Overall, we find little evidence that particulate matter is related to infant outcomes at the pollution levels experienced in NI, once we implement a mother fixed effects approach that accounts for time-invariant factors. This contrasts with strong associations in models that adjust for observed confounders but without fixed effects. While reducing ambient air pollution remains an urgent public health priority globally, our results imply that further improvements in short-run levels of prenatal PM2.5 exposure in a relatively low-pollution, higher-income country context, are unlikely to impact on birth outcomes at the population level.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前接触颗粒物与婴儿出生结果:来自全人口数据库的证据。
人们越来越关注污染对母婴健康的影响。尽管有大量的相关文献,但采用了旨在解决未测量混杂因素导致的潜在偏差的方法的观察性研究得出的结论却不尽相同。我们利用北爱尔兰(NI)的出生人口数据库与母亲怀孕期间居住地邮政编码(zipcodes)污染情况的本地化地理信息链接,研究了产前暴露于 PM2.5 是否与包括胎盘健康在内的一系列出生结果相关。总体而言,一旦我们采用母亲固定效应方法来考虑时间不变因素,我们发现几乎没有证据表明在北爱尔兰的污染水平下,颗粒物与婴儿的预后有关。这与调整观察到的混杂因素但不考虑固定效应的模型中的强关联形成了鲜明对比。虽然减少环境空气污染仍是全球公共卫生的当务之急,但我们的研究结果表明,在一个污染相对较低、收入较高的国家,进一步改善产前 PM2.5 暴露的短期水平不太可能对人口层面的出生结果产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Dynamic and Heterogeneous Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates in the USA. Public Health Insurance and Healthcare Utilisation Decisions of Young Adults. Issue Information Diagnosis Related Payment for Inpatient Mental Health Care: Hospital Selection and Effects on Length of Stay. Aggregation Bias and Socioeconomic Gradients in Waiting Time for Hospital Admissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1