Readmission after discharge from a medium secure service between 1999 and 2017: A retrospective cohort study

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1002/cbm.2346
Charlotte Hill, Ruth Bagshaw, Andrew Watt
{"title":"Readmission after discharge from a medium secure service between 1999 and 2017: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Charlotte Hill,&nbsp;Ruth Bagshaw,&nbsp;Andrew Watt","doi":"10.1002/cbm.2346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Previous research into outcomes after treatment in medium secure psychiatric hospitals has mostly relied on pre-millennium data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To examine patient and inpatient service-related factors associated with readmission within 2 years following discharge to the community or open conditions from conditions of medium security.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study of 137 patients discharged either to the community or to open conditions from one 64-bed South Wales Regional Medium Secure Hospital Unit between July 1999 and November 2017 was completed using data from healthcare records to document demographics, diagnosis and nature of index offences together with researcher-completed ratings of inpatient progress using the Dangerousness Understanding Recovery and Urgency Manual (DUNDRUM) Programme Completion and DUNDRUM Recovery scales. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent associations between inpatient progress according to these measures and readmission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-three patients (31%) were readmitted within 2 years of discharge and 23 (17%) in breach of legal conditions on discharge. Most readmitted patients (<i>n</i> = 29, 67%) returned directly to medium secure care. There were significant binary level associations between readmission and severity of the index offences (lower), number of adverse childhood experiences (higher), history of drug misuse (more likely) and number of previous psychiatric admissions (higher). Binary logistic regression confirmed that these relationships were not independent. No inpatient service-related variables, according to DUNDRUM scale scores, showed an independent association with readmission within 2 years post-discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The proportion of medium security hospital patients who were readmitted within 2 years of discharge aligns with estimates found in earlier national research using the same follow-up period. Since levels of inpatient progress bore little if any relationship to longer term outcomes, our findings highlight the need for investigating factors in the discharge environment that are linked to readmission. It is possible that readmission may indicate effective monitoring and responsive care to the changing needs of patients, but a better understanding of this is essential.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47362,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cbm.2346","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbm.2346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous research into outcomes after treatment in medium secure psychiatric hospitals has mostly relied on pre-millennium data.

Aims

To examine patient and inpatient service-related factors associated with readmission within 2 years following discharge to the community or open conditions from conditions of medium security.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 137 patients discharged either to the community or to open conditions from one 64-bed South Wales Regional Medium Secure Hospital Unit between July 1999 and November 2017 was completed using data from healthcare records to document demographics, diagnosis and nature of index offences together with researcher-completed ratings of inpatient progress using the Dangerousness Understanding Recovery and Urgency Manual (DUNDRUM) Programme Completion and DUNDRUM Recovery scales. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent associations between inpatient progress according to these measures and readmission.

Results

Forty-three patients (31%) were readmitted within 2 years of discharge and 23 (17%) in breach of legal conditions on discharge. Most readmitted patients (n = 29, 67%) returned directly to medium secure care. There were significant binary level associations between readmission and severity of the index offences (lower), number of adverse childhood experiences (higher), history of drug misuse (more likely) and number of previous psychiatric admissions (higher). Binary logistic regression confirmed that these relationships were not independent. No inpatient service-related variables, according to DUNDRUM scale scores, showed an independent association with readmission within 2 years post-discharge.

Conclusions

The proportion of medium security hospital patients who were readmitted within 2 years of discharge aligns with estimates found in earlier national research using the same follow-up period. Since levels of inpatient progress bore little if any relationship to longer term outcomes, our findings highlight the need for investigating factors in the discharge environment that are linked to readmission. It is possible that readmission may indicate effective monitoring and responsive care to the changing needs of patients, but a better understanding of this is essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1999 年至 2017 年间从中度戒备服务机构出院后的再入院情况:回顾性队列研究
背景:以前对中度戒备精神病院治疗后结果的研究大多依赖于千年前的数据。目的:研究与中度戒备条件下出院后两年内重新入院相关的患者和住院服务相关因素:对1999年7月至2017年11月期间从拥有64张床位的南威尔士地区中度戒备医院病房出院到社区或开放条件下的137名患者进行了回顾性队列研究,利用医疗记录中的数据记录了人口统计学、诊断和指数犯罪的性质,以及研究人员使用危险性理解恢复和紧急手册(DUNDRUM)计划完成和DUNDRUM恢复量表完成的住院进展评分。我们使用二元逻辑回归分析来确定根据这些测量方法得出的住院进展与再入院之间的独立关联:43名患者(31%)在出院后两年内再次入院,23名患者(17%)违反了出院时的法定条件。大多数再次入院的患者(n = 29,67%)都直接回到了中度安全护理机构。重新入院与指数罪行的严重程度(较低)、童年不良经历的数量(较高)、药物滥用史(更有可能)和之前入住精神病院的次数(较高)之间存在明显的二元关联。二元逻辑回归证实这些关系并非独立存在。根据DUNDRUM量表评分,与住院服务相关的变量均与出院后两年内再次入院无关:中度戒备医院患者在出院后两年内再次入院的比例与早前使用相同随访期进行的全国性研究得出的估计结果一致。由于住院病人的病情进展水平与长期治疗结果几乎没有任何关系,我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要调查出院环境中与再入院有关的因素。再次入院可能表明对病人不断变化的需求进行了有效的监控和响应,但更好地了解这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health – CBMH – aims to publish original material on any aspect of the relationship between mental state and criminal behaviour. Thus, we are interested in mental mechanisms associated with offending, regardless of whether the individual concerned has a mental disorder or not. We are interested in factors that influence such relationships, and particularly welcome studies about pathways into and out of crime. These will include studies of normal and abnormal development, of mental disorder and how that may lead to offending for a subgroup of sufferers, together with information about factors which mediate such a relationship.
期刊最新文献
Addiction behind bars: Swiss symposium insights. Exploration of a virtual reality exercise to help train police with responding to mental health crises in the community. Barriers to discharge: A retrospective study of factors associated with stays of longer than 2 years in a French secure hospital unit. An exploration into the prevalence and experience of neurodiversity among staff at a UK high-secure psychiatric hospital. Low sense of mattering in society and delinquency among young people: An initial investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1