Consequences of 'medical exceptions' in restrictive abortion legislation: caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy and beyond.

IF 3.4 3区医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202301

Natalie DiCenzo, Adam Elwood, Ruby Lin, Lily Bayat, Todd Rosen

引用次数: 0

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

限制性堕胎法中 "医疗例外 "的后果：剖腹产疤痕宫外孕及其他。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

6.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.

期刊最新文献

Shifting discourses, changing interests? How the language of sexual and reproductive health has evolved in the past 50 years. "That's not how abortions happen": a qualitative study exploring how young adults navigate abortion misinformation in the post-Roe era. Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain: cross-sectional survey data from the SACHA Study. Reported side effects from hormonal contraceptives among those seeking abortion care versus contraceptive services. The post-Roe potential of mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States.