Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer in women with an increased inherited risk: insights into an alternative strategy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Familial Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s10689-024-00412-0
T A Gootzen, M P Steenbeek, Mhd van Bommel, J IntHout, C M Kets, Rpmg Hermens, J A de Hullu
{"title":"Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer in women with an increased inherited risk: insights into an alternative strategy.","authors":"T A Gootzen, M P Steenbeek, Mhd van Bommel, J IntHout, C M Kets, Rpmg Hermens, J A de Hullu","doi":"10.1007/s10689-024-00412-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal type of gynaecological cancer, due to lack of effective screening possibilities and because the disease tends to metastasize before onset of symptoms. Women with an increased inherited risk for EOC are advised to undergo a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), which decreases their EOC risk by 96% when performed within guideline ages. However, it also induces premature menopause, which has harmful consequences. There is compelling evidence that the majority of EOCs originate in the fallopian tube. Therefore, a risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS with DO) has gained interest as an alternative strategy. Previous studies have shown that this alternative strategy has a positive effect on menopause-related quality of life and sexual health when compared to the standard RRSO. It is hypothesized that the alternative strategy is non-inferior to the standard RRSO with respect to oncological safety (EOC incidence). Three prospective studies are currently including patients to compare the safety and/or quality of life of the two distinct strategies. In this article we discuss the background, opportunities, and challenges of the current and alternative strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-024-00412-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal type of gynaecological cancer, due to lack of effective screening possibilities and because the disease tends to metastasize before onset of symptoms. Women with an increased inherited risk for EOC are advised to undergo a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), which decreases their EOC risk by 96% when performed within guideline ages. However, it also induces premature menopause, which has harmful consequences. There is compelling evidence that the majority of EOCs originate in the fallopian tube. Therefore, a risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS with DO) has gained interest as an alternative strategy. Previous studies have shown that this alternative strategy has a positive effect on menopause-related quality of life and sexual health when compared to the standard RRSO. It is hypothesized that the alternative strategy is non-inferior to the standard RRSO with respect to oncological safety (EOC incidence). Three prospective studies are currently including patients to compare the safety and/or quality of life of the two distinct strategies. In this article we discuss the background, opportunities, and challenges of the current and alternative strategy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过延迟输卵管切除术降低输卵管切除术的风险,以预防遗传风险增加的妇女患卵巢癌:对替代策略的见解。
上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)是妇科癌症中最致命的一种,原因是缺乏有效的筛查手段,而且这种疾病往往在出现症状之前就已经转移。建议遗传性 EOC 风险增加的妇女接受降低风险的输卵管切除术(RRSO),如果在规定年龄内进行,可将 EOC 风险降低 96%。然而,这也会诱发过早绝经,造成有害后果。有令人信服的证据表明,大多数 EOC 起源于输卵管。因此,降低风险的输卵管切除术和延迟输卵管切除术(RRS with DO)作为一种替代策略受到了关注。以往的研究表明,与标准 RRSO 相比,这种替代策略对更年期相关的生活质量和性健康有积极影响。据推测,就肿瘤安全性(EOC 发生率)而言,该替代策略并不比标准 RRSO 差。目前有三项前瞻性研究正在纳入患者,以比较两种不同策略的安全性和/或生活质量。在本文中,我们将讨论现行策略和替代策略的背景、机遇和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
期刊最新文献
A family-based approach to cascade genetic testing in a pediatric cancer genetics clinic. Cascade genetic testing in hereditary cancer: exploring the boundaries of the Italian legal framework. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic testing in unselected patients: example of private supplementation of public healthcare service. BRCAIndica: a resource for ACMG/AMP classified BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Germline pathogenic variants in RNF43 in patients with and without serrated polyposis syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1