Face recognition's practical relevance: Social bonds, not social butterflies

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105816
Laura M. Engfors , Jeremy Wilmer , Romina Palermo , Gilles E. Gignac , Laura T. Germine , Linda Jeffery
{"title":"Face recognition's practical relevance: Social bonds, not social butterflies","authors":"Laura M. Engfors ,&nbsp;Jeremy Wilmer ,&nbsp;Romina Palermo ,&nbsp;Gilles E. Gignac ,&nbsp;Laura T. Germine ,&nbsp;Linda Jeffery","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on individual differences in face recognition has provided important foundational insights: their broad range, cognitive specificity, strong heritability, and resilience to change. Elusive, however, has been the key issue of practical relevance: do these individual differences correlate with aspects of life that go beyond the recognition of faces, per se? Though often assumed, especially in social realms, such correlates remain largely theoretical, without empirical support. Here, we investigate an array of potential social correlates of face recognition. We establish social relationship quality as a reproducible correlate. This link generalises across face recognition tasks and across independent samples. In contrast, we detect no robust association with the sheer quantity of social connections, whether measured directly via number of social contacts or indirectly via extraversion-related personality indices. These findings document the existence of a key social correlate of face recognition and provide some of the first evidence to support its practical relevance. At the same time, they challenge the naive assumption that face recognition relates equally to all social outcomes. In contrast, they suggest a focused link of face recognition to the quality, not quantity, of one's social connections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001021/pdfft?md5=a204162951019096b794fb3aa9c80c21&pid=1-s2.0-S0010027724001021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on individual differences in face recognition has provided important foundational insights: their broad range, cognitive specificity, strong heritability, and resilience to change. Elusive, however, has been the key issue of practical relevance: do these individual differences correlate with aspects of life that go beyond the recognition of faces, per se? Though often assumed, especially in social realms, such correlates remain largely theoretical, without empirical support. Here, we investigate an array of potential social correlates of face recognition. We establish social relationship quality as a reproducible correlate. This link generalises across face recognition tasks and across independent samples. In contrast, we detect no robust association with the sheer quantity of social connections, whether measured directly via number of social contacts or indirectly via extraversion-related personality indices. These findings document the existence of a key social correlate of face recognition and provide some of the first evidence to support its practical relevance. At the same time, they challenge the naive assumption that face recognition relates equally to all social outcomes. In contrast, they suggest a focused link of face recognition to the quality, not quantity, of one's social connections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人脸识别的实用性:社会纽带,而非社会蝴蝶
关于人脸识别个体差异的研究已经提供了重要的基础性见解:这些差异范围广泛、具有认知特异性、遗传性强以及对变化的适应能力强。然而,具有实际意义的关键问题却一直悬而未决:这些个体差异是否与生活中超出人脸识别本身的其他方面相关联?尽管人们经常假设,特别是在社会领域,但这种相关性在很大程度上仍然是理论性的,没有经验支持。在这里,我们研究了人脸识别的一系列潜在社会相关因素。我们确定社会关系质量是一种可重复的相关因素。这种关联在不同的人脸识别任务和不同的独立样本中都具有普遍性。与此相反,我们并没有发现纯粹的社会关系数量与人脸识别的相关性,无论是直接通过社会联系人的数量还是间接通过与外向性相关的人格指数来衡量。这些发现证明了人脸识别存在一个关键的社会相关因素,并为其实际意义提供了一些初步证据。与此同时,这些研究还对人脸识别与所有社会结果具有同等关系的天真假设提出了质疑。相反,他们认为人脸识别与一个人的社会关系的质量而非数量有着密切的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
Impact of conflicts between long- and short-term priors on the weighted prior integration in visual perception Predicting large-scale spatial ability from small-scale spatial abilities in children: An application of the double-dimension framework Motor inhibition prevents motor execution during typing imagery: Evidence from an action-mode switching paradigm Blending simulation and abstraction for physical reasoning On the role of analytic thinking in religious belief change: Evidence from over 50,000 participants in 16 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1