Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer in Shorter and Longer Follow-Up Duration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1097/COC.0000000000001100
Obaid Ur Rehman, Eeshal Fatima, Hiba Imran, Umar Akram, Amna Badar Ahmad, Zain Ali Nadeem, Laveeza Fatima, Ahmad Hussain, Manar Alaa Mabrouk, Muhammad Zain Farooq
{"title":"Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer in Shorter and Longer Follow-Up Duration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Obaid Ur Rehman, Eeshal Fatima, Hiba Imran, Umar Akram, Amna Badar Ahmad, Zain Ali Nadeem, Laveeza Fatima, Ahmad Hussain, Manar Alaa Mabrouk, Muhammad Zain Farooq","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer over a shorter and longer follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar for all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that administered bevacizumab to women with ovarian cancer. Review Manager 5.4 was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs. We assessed the quality of the included studies using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts, we included nine RCTs in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Four RCTs had a low risk of bias, while 5 had some concerns. Bevacizumab was associated with a progression free survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.76, P <0.0001, I2 =90%) and >36 months (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80, P <0.0001, I2 =80%), and an overall survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, P =0.02, I2 =0%) but not for >36 months (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.09, P =0.77, I2 =30%). There was no difference in deaths between intervention and control groups <36 months (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04, P =0.26, I2 =10%) or >36 months (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.06, P =0.50, I2 =0%). Bevacizumab reduced disease progression <36 months (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.92, P =0.0008, I2 =82%) but not at >36 months (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.19, P =0.30, I2 =94%). The adverse events reported with Bevacizumab use included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukocytopenia, anemia, hypertension, bleeding or hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal, cardiac, and dermatological adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bevacizumab may improve progression-free survival within and after 36 months, overall survival within 36 months, and reduce disease progression within 36 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"399-408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer over a shorter and longer follow-up period.

Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar for all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that administered bevacizumab to women with ovarian cancer. Review Manager 5.4 was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs. We assessed the quality of the included studies using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).

Results: After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts, we included nine RCTs in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Four RCTs had a low risk of bias, while 5 had some concerns. Bevacizumab was associated with a progression free survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.76, P <0.0001, I2 =90%) and >36 months (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80, P <0.0001, I2 =80%), and an overall survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, P =0.02, I2 =0%) but not for >36 months (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.09, P =0.77, I2 =30%). There was no difference in deaths between intervention and control groups <36 months (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04, P =0.26, I2 =10%) or >36 months (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.06, P =0.50, I2 =0%). Bevacizumab reduced disease progression <36 months (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.92, P =0.0008, I2 =82%) but not at >36 months (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.19, P =0.30, I2 =94%). The adverse events reported with Bevacizumab use included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukocytopenia, anemia, hypertension, bleeding or hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal, cardiac, and dermatological adverse events.

Conclusion: Bevacizumab may improve progression-free survival within and after 36 months, overall survival within 36 months, and reduce disease progression within 36 months.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝伐单抗联合疗法与标准化疗治疗卵巢癌的随访时间长短对比:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
研究目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估贝伐单抗在较短和较长随访期内对卵巢癌患者的疗效和安全性:我们检索了 Medline、Cochrane CENTRAL、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 中所有对卵巢癌女性患者使用贝伐单抗的 3 期随机对照试验 (RCT)。使用Review Manager 5.4计算风险比(RR)和危险比(HR)及95% CI。我们使用科克伦偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)第 2 版评估了纳入研究的质量:经过对标题、摘要和全文的筛选,我们在系统综述和荟萃分析中纳入了 9 项研究。其中 4 项研究的偏倚风险较低,5 项研究存在一些问题。贝伐单抗与36个月的无进展生存期相关(HR:0.66,95% CI:0.55-0.80,P36个月(HR:0.98,95% CI:0.89-1.09,P=0.77,I2=30%)。干预组和对照组 36 个月的死亡人数没有差异(RR:1.02,95% CI:0.97-1.06,P=0.50,I2=0%)。贝伐单抗可在36个月内减少疾病进展(RR:0.83,95% CI:0.58-1.19,P=0.30,I2=94%)。贝伐珠单抗的不良反应包括血小板减少、中性粒细胞减少、白细胞减少、贫血、高血压、出血或大出血,以及胃肠道、心脏和皮肤不良反应:结论:贝伐珠单抗可改善36个月内和36个月后的无进展生存期、36个月内的总生存期,并减少36个月内的疾病进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
期刊最新文献
Geospatial Mapping of Head and Neck Cancer Research: Assessing Access, Disparities, and Characteristics of Head and Neck Cancer Clinical Trials Across the United States. Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Nonrandomized Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Liposomal Irinotecan With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin, Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer in a Watch-and-Wait Program. Complications, Costs, and Health Care Resource Use with Tissue Biopsy Followed by Liquid Biopsy Versus Tissue Re-biopsy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nonsmall-cell Lung Cancer. Evaluating N-acetylcysteine as a Protective Agent Against Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy in Breast Cancer: A Triple-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Efficacy and Safety of BRCA-targeted Therapy (Polyadenosine Diphosphate-ribose Polymerase Inhibitors) in Treatment of BRCA-mutated Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1