[Ten years of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic literature review].

IF 1.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pneumologie Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2331-8978
Susanne Habetha, Sven Sauermann, Stefanie Müller, Gerd Gottschalk
{"title":"[Ten years of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic literature review].","authors":"Susanne Habetha, Sven Sauermann, Stefanie Müller, Gerd Gottschalk","doi":"10.1055/a-2331-8978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To show the importance of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) as a treatment method for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the German healthcare context and to better assess the way patients who do not receive adequate care could benefit from HGNS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review in the Medline and Cochrane Library literature database was conducted, including publications using different stimulation technologies for HGNS. The efficacy of HGNS was assessed based on patient-relevant outcomes (daytime sleepiness, quality of life), treatment adherence and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI). The safety of the treatment method was assessed based on adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion and analysis of 33 publications: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, level Ib), 1 level IIb trial (n = 1) and 30 level IV trials with a study duration of up to 60 months. The RCTs showed better values for daytime sleepiness and quality of life when using HGNS than in the control group. AHI and ODI showed a deterioration under placebo stimulation or therapy withdrawal in the RCTs. Consistently high adherence was also reported in the long-term course. Severe AEs under HGNS were rare and could usually be resolved by repositioning electrodes or replacing device components. Other AEs were mostly transient or could be resolved by non-invasive measures. All investigated parameters showed similar results in the evaluated studies. The results of different stimulation systems are comparable in type and extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comprehensive review of the literature shows consistent data that highlight the importance of HGNS as an effective and safe treatment for OSA after unsuccessful CPAP treatment. The evaluation also shows that the different stimulation systems make it possible to better tailor the therapy to the patient's individual requirements. A future systematic evaluation of real-world data on the use of HGNS would help gain additional insights into the relevance of the method in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20197,"journal":{"name":"Pneumologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2331-8978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To show the importance of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) as a treatment method for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the German healthcare context and to better assess the way patients who do not receive adequate care could benefit from HGNS.

Methods: A systematic literature review in the Medline and Cochrane Library literature database was conducted, including publications using different stimulation technologies for HGNS. The efficacy of HGNS was assessed based on patient-relevant outcomes (daytime sleepiness, quality of life), treatment adherence and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI). The safety of the treatment method was assessed based on adverse events (AEs).

Results: Inclusion and analysis of 33 publications: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, level Ib), 1 level IIb trial (n = 1) and 30 level IV trials with a study duration of up to 60 months. The RCTs showed better values for daytime sleepiness and quality of life when using HGNS than in the control group. AHI and ODI showed a deterioration under placebo stimulation or therapy withdrawal in the RCTs. Consistently high adherence was also reported in the long-term course. Severe AEs under HGNS were rare and could usually be resolved by repositioning electrodes or replacing device components. Other AEs were mostly transient or could be resolved by non-invasive measures. All investigated parameters showed similar results in the evaluated studies. The results of different stimulation systems are comparable in type and extent.

Conclusion: The comprehensive review of the literature shows consistent data that highlight the importance of HGNS as an effective and safe treatment for OSA after unsuccessful CPAP treatment. The evaluation also shows that the different stimulation systems make it possible to better tailor the therapy to the patient's individual requirements. A future systematic evaluation of real-world data on the use of HGNS would help gain additional insights into the relevance of the method in routine clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停十年:系统性文献综述]。
目的说明舌下神经刺激(HGNS)作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)治疗方法在德国医疗保健领域的重要性,并更好地评估未得到适当治疗的患者如何从 HGNS 中获益:方法:在 Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆文献数据库中进行了系统的文献综述,包括使用不同刺激技术进行 HGNS 的出版物。根据患者相关结果(白天嗜睡、生活质量)、治疗依从性、呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)和氧饱和度指数(ODI)评估了 HGNS 的疗效。根据不良事件(AEs)评估治疗方法的安全性:结果:纳入并分析了 33 篇出版物:结果:纳入并分析了 33 篇文献:2 项随机对照试验(RCT,Ib 级)、1 项 IIb 级试验(n = 1)和 30 项 IV 级试验,研究持续时间长达 60 个月。随机对照试验显示,使用 HGNS 后,白天嗜睡程度和生活质量均优于对照组。在研究试验中,安慰剂刺激或停药后,AHI 和 ODI 有所下降。在长期治疗过程中,患者的依从性也一直很高。在 HGNS 治疗中,严重的 AEs 非常罕见,通常可以通过调整电极位置或更换设备组件来解决。其他不良反应大多是一过性的,或可通过非侵入性措施解决。在所评估的研究中,所有调查参数都显示出相似的结果。不同刺激系统的结果在类型和程度上具有可比性:文献综述显示,一致的数据凸显了 HGNS 作为 CPAP 治疗失败后治疗 OSA 的有效、安全方法的重要性。评估还表明,不同的刺激系统可以更好地根据患者的个人要求进行治疗。未来对使用 HGNS 的实际数据进行系统评估,将有助于进一步了解该方法在常规临床实践中的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumologie
Pneumologie RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
416
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie DGP Organ des Deutschen Zentralkomitees zur Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose DZK Organ des Bundesverbandes der Pneumologen BdP Fachärzte für Lungen- und Bronchialheilkunde, Pneumologen und Allergologen
期刊最新文献
[Maternity protection in pneumology: considerations for a positive list]. Validation of the German version of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ). [Valsalva and Müller maneuvers: who is who and what is what?] [Chest ultrasound for imaging of pneumonia]. Ist die VATS tatsächlich der Goldstandard in der Diagnostik des malignen Mesothelioms?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1