INcentives and ReMINDers to Improve Long-Term Medication Adherence (INMIND): impact of a pilot randomized controlled trial in a large HIV clinic in Uganda

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of the International AIDS Society Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/jia2.26306
Sebastian Linnemayr, Mary Odiit, Barbara Mukasa, Ishita Ghai, Chad Stecher
{"title":"INcentives and ReMINDers to Improve Long-Term Medication Adherence (INMIND): impact of a pilot randomized controlled trial in a large HIV clinic in Uganda","authors":"Sebastian Linnemayr,&nbsp;Mary Odiit,&nbsp;Barbara Mukasa,&nbsp;Ishita Ghai,&nbsp;Chad Stecher","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Habits are a common strategy for successfully countering medication non-adherence, yet existing interventions do not support participants during the long habit formation period, resulting in high attrition. We test a novel intervention combining text messages and incentives with anchoring to support antiretroviral therapy (ART) pill-taking habits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a randomized, parallel controlled trial, a sample of 155 participants 18 years and older who initiated ART within 3 months were recruited at Mildmay Uganda between October 2021 and April 2022. All participants were educated on the anchoring strategy and chose an anchor, that is existing routines, to pair with pill-taking. Participants were randomized to either usual care (C = 49), daily text message reminders to follow their anchoring plan (<i>Messages</i> group; T1 = 49) or messages and incentives conditional on pill-taking in line with their anchor (<i>Incentives</i> group; T2 = 57). Assessments occurred at baseline, month 3 (end of intervention) and month 9 (end of observation period). The primary outcomes are electronically measured mean adherence and pill-taking consistent with participants’ anchor time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The primary outcome of pill-taking in line with the anchoring plan was higher in the <i>Incentives</i> group during the 3-month intervention (12.2 p.p. [95% CI: 2.2 22.2; <i>p</i> = .02]), and remained significantly higher after the incentives were withdrawn (months 4−6 (14.2 p.p. [95% CI 1.1 27.2; <i>p</i> = .03]); months 7−9 (14.1 p.p. [95% CI −0.2 28.5; <i>p</i> = .05])). Mean adherence was higher in both treatment groups relative to the control group during the intervention (T1 vs. C, <i>p</i> = .06; T2 vs. C, <i>p</i> = .06) but not post-intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The promising approach of using incentives to support habit formation among ART treatment initiators needs to be evaluated in a fully powered study to further our understanding of the habit formation process and to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Habits are a common strategy for successfully countering medication non-adherence, yet existing interventions do not support participants during the long habit formation period, resulting in high attrition. We test a novel intervention combining text messages and incentives with anchoring to support antiretroviral therapy (ART) pill-taking habits.

Methods

In a randomized, parallel controlled trial, a sample of 155 participants 18 years and older who initiated ART within 3 months were recruited at Mildmay Uganda between October 2021 and April 2022. All participants were educated on the anchoring strategy and chose an anchor, that is existing routines, to pair with pill-taking. Participants were randomized to either usual care (C = 49), daily text message reminders to follow their anchoring plan (Messages group; T1 = 49) or messages and incentives conditional on pill-taking in line with their anchor (Incentives group; T2 = 57). Assessments occurred at baseline, month 3 (end of intervention) and month 9 (end of observation period). The primary outcomes are electronically measured mean adherence and pill-taking consistent with participants’ anchor time.

Results

The primary outcome of pill-taking in line with the anchoring plan was higher in the Incentives group during the 3-month intervention (12.2 p.p. [95% CI: 2.2 22.2; p = .02]), and remained significantly higher after the incentives were withdrawn (months 4−6 (14.2 p.p. [95% CI 1.1 27.2; p = .03]); months 7−9 (14.1 p.p. [95% CI −0.2 28.5; p = .05])). Mean adherence was higher in both treatment groups relative to the control group during the intervention (T1 vs. C, p = .06; T2 vs. C, p = .06) but not post-intervention.

Conclusions

The promising approach of using incentives to support habit formation among ART treatment initiators needs to be evaluated in a fully powered study to further our understanding of the habit formation process and to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高长期用药依从性的激励和再提醒(INMIND):在乌干达一家大型艾滋病诊所开展的随机对照试验的影响。
简介:习惯是成功应对不坚持服药的常用策略,但现有干预措施无法在漫长的习惯养成期为参与者提供支持,从而导致高流失率。我们测试了一种新颖的干预方法,它将短信和激励措施与锚定相结合,以支持抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)患者养成服药习惯:在一项随机平行对照试验中,2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 4 月期间,我们在乌干达米尔德梅招募了 155 名 18 岁及以上、在 3 个月内开始接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的参与者。所有参与者都接受了关于锚定策略的教育,并选择了一个锚点,即现有的常规习惯,与服药搭配。参与者被随机分配到常规护理组(C = 49)、每日短信提醒遵循锚定计划组(信息组;T1 = 49)或根据锚定计划服药的信息和奖励组(奖励组;T2 = 57)。评估分别在基线、第 3 个月(干预结束)和第 9 个月(观察期结束)进行。主要结果是电子测量的平均依从性和与参与者锚定时间一致的服药情况:结果:在为期 3 个月的干预期间,激励组按照锚定计划服药的主要结果较高(12.2 p.p. [95% CI: 2.2 22.2; p = .02]),并且在取消激励后仍然显著较高(第 4-6 个月(14.2 p.p. [95% CI 1.1 27.2; p = .03]);第 7-9 个月(14.1 p.p. [95% CI -0.2 28.5; p = .05]))。在干预期间,两个治疗组的平均坚持率均高于对照组(T1 vs. C,p = .06;T2 vs. C,p = .06),但干预后的坚持率没有提高:使用激励措施支持抗逆转录病毒疗法初学者形成习惯的方法很有前景,需要在一项完全有效的研究中进行评估,以加深我们对习惯形成过程的了解,并评估其成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Impact of switching to a dolutegravir-based regimen on body weight changes: insights from West African adult HIV cohorts Adherence measurement considerations for oral antiretroviral medications Preferences of people living with HIV for features of tuberculosis preventive treatment regimens in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment Recent infection testing to inform HIV prevention responses and surveillance in a programme context: lessons from implementation within a nationally scaled female sex worker programme in Zimbabwe Increasing event-driven HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Australia: results from behavioural surveillance 2019–2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1