Epidemiology of peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries in a trauma population.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-26 Print Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.002424
Maya Zaidman, Christine B Novak, Rajiv Midha, Jana Dengler
{"title":"Epidemiology of peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries in a trauma population.","authors":"Maya Zaidman, Christine B Novak, Rajiv Midha, Jana Dengler","doi":"10.1503/cjs.002424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding patterns of peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) and brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) is essential to preventing and appropriately managing nerve injuries. We sought to assess the incidence, cause, and severity of PNIs and BPIs sustained by patients with trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of the Trauma Registry Database (January 2002 to December 2020) to identify patients with PNIs or BPIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated data from 24 905 patients with trauma; 335 (1.3%) sustained PNIs (81% male; mean age 36 yr, standard deviation [SD] 16 yr) and 64 (0.3%) sustained BPIs (84% male; mean age 35, SD 15 yr). Nerves in the upper extremities were more commonly affected than those in the lower extremities. Sharp injuries (39.4%) and motorcycle accidents (32.8%) were the most frequent causes of PNIs and BPIs, respectively. Other common causes of PNI were motor vehicle collisions (16.7%) and gunshot wounds (12.8%). Many patients with PNIs (69.0%) and BPIs (53%) underwent operative management. The most frequent reconstruction for PNI was primary nerve repair (66%), while nerve transfers (48%) were more frequently used for BPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nerve injuries in the trauma population have decreased over the last 3 decades with shifts in mechanisms of injury and use of imaging, electrodiagnostic tests, and surgery. Nerve injuries are often complex and time-sensitive to treat; understanding changes in trends is important to ensure optimal patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E261-E268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.002424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding patterns of peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) and brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) is essential to preventing and appropriately managing nerve injuries. We sought to assess the incidence, cause, and severity of PNIs and BPIs sustained by patients with trauma.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the Trauma Registry Database (January 2002 to December 2020) to identify patients with PNIs or BPIs.

Results: We evaluated data from 24 905 patients with trauma; 335 (1.3%) sustained PNIs (81% male; mean age 36 yr, standard deviation [SD] 16 yr) and 64 (0.3%) sustained BPIs (84% male; mean age 35, SD 15 yr). Nerves in the upper extremities were more commonly affected than those in the lower extremities. Sharp injuries (39.4%) and motorcycle accidents (32.8%) were the most frequent causes of PNIs and BPIs, respectively. Other common causes of PNI were motor vehicle collisions (16.7%) and gunshot wounds (12.8%). Many patients with PNIs (69.0%) and BPIs (53%) underwent operative management. The most frequent reconstruction for PNI was primary nerve repair (66%), while nerve transfers (48%) were more frequently used for BPI.

Conclusion: Nerve injuries in the trauma population have decreased over the last 3 decades with shifts in mechanisms of injury and use of imaging, electrodiagnostic tests, and surgery. Nerve injuries are often complex and time-sensitive to treat; understanding changes in trends is important to ensure optimal patient management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外伤人群中周围神经和臂丛神经损伤的流行病学。
背景:了解周围神经损伤(PNIs)和臂丛神经损伤(BPIs)的模式对于预防和适当处理神经损伤至关重要。我们试图评估外伤患者外周神经损伤和臂丛神经损伤的发生率、原因和严重程度:我们对创伤登记数据库(2002 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月)进行了回顾性审查,以确定 PNI 或 BPI 患者:我们评估了 24 905 名外伤患者的数据,其中 335 人(1.3%)持续 PNI(81% 为男性;平均年龄 36 岁,标准差 [SD] 16 岁),64 人(0.3%)持续 BPI(84% 为男性;平均年龄 35 岁,标准差 15 岁)。上肢神经比下肢神经更容易受到影响。锐器伤(39.4%)和摩托车事故(32.8%)分别是导致PNI和BPI的最常见原因。其他常见的 PNI 原因是机动车碰撞(16.7%)和枪伤(12.8%)。许多 PNI(69.0%)和 BPI(53%)患者都接受了手术治疗。PNI最常见的重建方法是初级神经修复术(66%),而神经转移术(48%)更多用于BPI:结论:过去 30 年中,随着损伤机制的转变以及影像学、电诊断测试和手术的使用,创伤人群中的神经损伤有所减少。神经损伤通常比较复杂,治疗时间紧迫;了解神经损伤的趋势变化对确保患者得到最佳治疗非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
Canadian Spine Society: 24th Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, February 28 - Saturday, March 2, Fairmont Chateau Whistler, Whistler, B.C., Canada. Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty. Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective. Perceptions of readiness for independent practice among graduating orthopedic surgery residents in Ontario in the last 30 years. Injury and violence in the context of sustainable development: The first Bethune Round Table in Africa, Bethune Round Table 2024, Conference on Global Surgery, May 16-18, 2024, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1