Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged ≥65 Years

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.04.011
{"title":"Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged ≥65 Years","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The ideal management of distal radius fractures<span> (DRFs) in patients aged 65 years and older is debated. Acknowledging the evidence that both nonsurgical and surgical treatment yield similar outcomes one year after injury, a patient decision aid (PDA) could facilitate patient engagement in treatment decision-making. The purpose of this study was to develop a PDA to guide patients in the treatment of DRFs in patients ≥65 years of age.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The DRF PDA was developed using an established decision sciences framework. The PDA included an overview of DRFs, treatment options (casting vs surgery), risk/benefits, and a values clarification section. During the development phase, hand surgeons and patients reviewed the PDA; then, semistructured interviews were performed with participants to elicit feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven patients and 11 hand surgeons participated in the study. All patients found the PDA useful and almost all stated it would make the treatment decision easier. Most patients believed that there was enough information in the PDA, but one desired more information about surgical risks. Almost all surgeons stated the PDA would be easy for patients to use and understand, and approximately half believed that it would help patients make a more informed decision. Most surgeons expressed that the PDA would complement their usual approach to counseling patients, but some noted it would involve changes to their workflow. Most participants believed the information presented was unbiased, but one patient thought it was biased toward surgery, whereas a few surgeons believed that it was biased toward nonsurgical treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>All patients expressed that the PDA was informative, comprehensive, and easy to understand and would be helpful if they were deciding about DRF treatment. Surgeons believed that patients would find the PDA easy to use and understand, but some had concerns about incorporating it into their clinic workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>A decision aid for the treatment of DRFs in patients aged ≥65 years can be used to engage patients in the shared decision-making process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036350232400203X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The ideal management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged 65 years and older is debated. Acknowledging the evidence that both nonsurgical and surgical treatment yield similar outcomes one year after injury, a patient decision aid (PDA) could facilitate patient engagement in treatment decision-making. The purpose of this study was to develop a PDA to guide patients in the treatment of DRFs in patients ≥65 years of age.

Methods

The DRF PDA was developed using an established decision sciences framework. The PDA included an overview of DRFs, treatment options (casting vs surgery), risk/benefits, and a values clarification section. During the development phase, hand surgeons and patients reviewed the PDA; then, semistructured interviews were performed with participants to elicit feedback.

Results

Eleven patients and 11 hand surgeons participated in the study. All patients found the PDA useful and almost all stated it would make the treatment decision easier. Most patients believed that there was enough information in the PDA, but one desired more information about surgical risks. Almost all surgeons stated the PDA would be easy for patients to use and understand, and approximately half believed that it would help patients make a more informed decision. Most surgeons expressed that the PDA would complement their usual approach to counseling patients, but some noted it would involve changes to their workflow. Most participants believed the information presented was unbiased, but one patient thought it was biased toward surgery, whereas a few surgeons believed that it was biased toward nonsurgical treatment.

Conclusions

All patients expressed that the PDA was informative, comprehensive, and easy to understand and would be helpful if they were deciding about DRF treatment. Surgeons believed that patients would find the PDA easy to use and understand, but some had concerns about incorporating it into their clinic workflow.

Clinical relevance

A decision aid for the treatment of DRFs in patients aged ≥65 years can be used to engage patients in the shared decision-making process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为年龄≥65岁的桡骨远端骨折患者开发患者决策辅助工具。
目的:对于 65 岁及以上患者桡骨远端骨折 (DRF) 的理想治疗方法存在争议。有证据表明,非手术治疗和手术治疗在受伤一年后的疗效相似,因此患者决策辅助工具(PDA)可促进患者参与治疗决策。本研究旨在开发一种 PDA,以指导患者治疗年龄≥65 岁的 DRF 患者:DRF PDA 是利用已建立的决策科学框架开发的。PDA包括DRF概述、治疗方案(石膏固定与手术)、风险/益处以及价值澄清部分。在开发阶段,手外科医生和患者对 PDA 进行了审阅;然后,对参与者进行了半结构化访谈,以征求反馈意见:结果:11 名患者和 11 名手外科医生参与了研究。所有患者都认为 PDA 很有用,几乎所有患者都表示它能让治疗决定更容易做出。大多数患者认为 PDA 提供了足够的信息,但有一名患者希望获得更多有关手术风险的信息。几乎所有的外科医生都表示 PDA 会让患者易于使用和理解,大约一半的外科医生认为 PDA 会帮助患者做出更明智的决定。大多数外科医生表示,掌上电脑将对他们向患者提供咨询的常规方法起到补充作用,但也有一些外科医生指出,这需要改变他们的工作流程。大多数参与者认为所提供的信息没有偏见,但有一名患者认为信息偏向于手术治疗,而少数外科医生则认为信息偏向于非手术治疗:所有患者都认为 PDA 信息丰富、全面、易于理解,对他们决定 DRF 治疗很有帮助。外科医生认为患者会发现 PDA 易于使用和理解,但有些外科医生对将其纳入临床工作流程存在顾虑:临床相关性:针对年龄≥65 岁患者的 DRF 治疗的辅助决策工具可用于让患者参与共同决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A Percutaneous Triple K-Wire Fixation Technique for Nascent Malunion of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocation: A Case Series With an Assessment of Functional Outcome. Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Hand Infections. Mid-Term Outcomes Following Trapeziectomy With Suture Suspensionplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis. Passive Mobilization With Place-and-Hold Versus Active Mobilization Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair: 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. The Learning Curves of Adelaide- and Gan-Modified Lim-Tsai Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1