Vestibular evaluation with video head impulse test in pediatric cochlear implant patients.

Teresa Pérez-Castillo, Silvia Ortiz-Rodríguez, Sandra K Vélez-Pelcastre, Jessica Ma González-Corona
{"title":"Vestibular evaluation with video head impulse test in pediatric cochlear implant patients.","authors":"Teresa Pérez-Castillo, Silvia Ortiz-Rodríguez, Sandra K Vélez-Pelcastre, Jessica Ma González-Corona","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.24000022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cochlear implant (CI) is effective for rehabilitating patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, its placement and use have been associated with various complications, such as those affecting the vestibular system. The objective of this study was to compare vestibular function using the video head impulse test (vHIT) in pediatric patients before and after CI placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive and retrospective study was conducted. The outcomes of 11 pediatric patients of both sexes with a history of profound hearing loss were evaluated. The results of vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, saccades, asymmetry, Pérez Rey (PR) index, and VOR/saccade ratio for both ears obtained by the vHIT test before and after CI placement were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11 patients evaluated, the VOR gain showed that 81.8% had normal function, 18.2% had hypofunction, and no patients had hyperfunction before implantation. No statistically significant differences were found when compared with post-implant off and post-implant on conditions (p > 0.05). The extracted variables, asymmetry, PR index, and the VOR/saccades ratio also showed no statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-implant conditions, whether off or on.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vestibular function of pediatric patients did not show significant changes before and after CI placement. The vHIT test is a valuable tool for assessing vestibular function and could be considered a criterion for surgical and rehabilitation decisions in patients undergoing CI placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"81 3","pages":"162-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.24000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The cochlear implant (CI) is effective for rehabilitating patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, its placement and use have been associated with various complications, such as those affecting the vestibular system. The objective of this study was to compare vestibular function using the video head impulse test (vHIT) in pediatric patients before and after CI placement.

Methods: A descriptive and retrospective study was conducted. The outcomes of 11 pediatric patients of both sexes with a history of profound hearing loss were evaluated. The results of vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, saccades, asymmetry, Pérez Rey (PR) index, and VOR/saccade ratio for both ears obtained by the vHIT test before and after CI placement were compared.

Results: Of the 11 patients evaluated, the VOR gain showed that 81.8% had normal function, 18.2% had hypofunction, and no patients had hyperfunction before implantation. No statistically significant differences were found when compared with post-implant off and post-implant on conditions (p > 0.05). The extracted variables, asymmetry, PR index, and the VOR/saccades ratio also showed no statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-implant conditions, whether off or on.

Conclusions: The vestibular function of pediatric patients did not show significant changes before and after CI placement. The vHIT test is a valuable tool for assessing vestibular function and could be considered a criterion for surgical and rehabilitation decisions in patients undergoing CI placement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过视频头脉冲测试对小儿人工耳蜗植入患者的前庭进行评估。
背景:人工耳蜗(CI)对重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失患者的康复非常有效。然而,其植入和使用与各种并发症有关,如影响前庭系统的并发症。本研究的目的是通过视频头脉冲测试(vHIT)比较植入人工耳蜗前后儿童患者的前庭功能:方法:进行了一项描述性和回顾性研究。评估了 11 名有深度听力损失病史的男女儿童患者的结果。比较了植入人工耳蜗前后通过 vHIT 测试获得的双耳前庭-眼反射(VOR)增益、囊视、不对称、佩雷斯-雷伊(PR)指数和 VOR/囊视比率的结果:在接受评估的 11 名患者中,植入前 VOR 增益显示 81.8% 的患者功能正常,18.2% 的患者功能低下,没有患者功能亢进。与植入后关闭和植入后开启的情况相比,没有发现明显的统计学差异(P > 0.05)。提取的变量、不对称、PR 指数和 VOR/saccades 比值在植入前和植入后(无论是关闭还是开启)之间也没有统计学意义上的显著差异:儿科患者的前庭功能在植入 CI 前后没有明显变化。vHIT 测试是评估前庭功能的重要工具,可作为植入 CI 患者手术和康复决策的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgments to reviewers 2023. Analysis of the changes in the management of preterm newborns born in a Spanish third-level hospital in the past 10 years. Changes in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit statistics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparison between the KARVI scale and the Child Development Evaluation test (EDI) as a screening tool for suspected neurodevelopmental delay. Dietary patterns of Sonoran breastfeeding women are associated to exclusive or partial breastfeeding regimes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1