Interventions to reduce adult state anxiety, dental trait anxiety, and dental phobia: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102891
Serge A. Steenen , Fabiënne Linke , Roos van Westrhenen , Ad de Jongh
{"title":"Interventions to reduce adult state anxiety, dental trait anxiety, and dental phobia: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Serge A. Steenen ,&nbsp;Fabiënne Linke ,&nbsp;Roos van Westrhenen ,&nbsp;Ad de Jongh","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review evaluates randomized controlled trials (RCTs) intervening on adult state anxiety (fear and emotional distress during dental treatment), chronic dental (trait) anxiety or dental phobia (disproportionately high trait anxiety; meeting diagnostic criteria for specific phobia). Seven online databases were systematically searched. 173 RCTs met inclusion criteria, of which 67 qualified for 14 pooled analyses. To alleviate state anxiety during oral surgery, moderate-certainty evidence supports employing hypnosis (<em>SMD</em>=–0.31, <em>95 %CI</em>[–0.56,–0.05]), and low-certainty evidence supports prescribing benzodiazepines (<em>SMD</em>=–0.43, [–0.74,–0.12]). Evidence for reducing state anxiety is inconclusive regarding psychotherapy, and does not support virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET), virtual reality distraction, music, aromatherapy, video information and acupuncture. To reduce trait anxiety, moderate-certainty evidence supports using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT; <em>SMD</em>=–0.65, [–1.06, –0.24]). Regarding dental phobia, evidence with low-to-moderate certainty supports employing psychotherapy (<em>SMD</em>=–0.48, [–0.72,–0.24]), and CBT specifically (<em>SMD</em>=–0.43, [–0.68,–0.17]), but not VRET. These results show that dental anxieties are manageable and treatable. Clinicians should ensure that interventions match their purpose—managing acute emotions during treatment, or alleviating chronic anxiety and avoidance tendencies. Existing research gaps underscore the necessity for future trials to minimize bias and follow CONSORT reporting guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102891"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000677/pdfft?md5=21ea3f7200299bd8728d747dd47c1bf0&pid=1-s2.0-S0887618524000677-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review evaluates randomized controlled trials (RCTs) intervening on adult state anxiety (fear and emotional distress during dental treatment), chronic dental (trait) anxiety or dental phobia (disproportionately high trait anxiety; meeting diagnostic criteria for specific phobia). Seven online databases were systematically searched. 173 RCTs met inclusion criteria, of which 67 qualified for 14 pooled analyses. To alleviate state anxiety during oral surgery, moderate-certainty evidence supports employing hypnosis (SMD=–0.31, 95 %CI[–0.56,–0.05]), and low-certainty evidence supports prescribing benzodiazepines (SMD=–0.43, [–0.74,–0.12]). Evidence for reducing state anxiety is inconclusive regarding psychotherapy, and does not support virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET), virtual reality distraction, music, aromatherapy, video information and acupuncture. To reduce trait anxiety, moderate-certainty evidence supports using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT; SMD=–0.65, [–1.06, –0.24]). Regarding dental phobia, evidence with low-to-moderate certainty supports employing psychotherapy (SMD=–0.48, [–0.72,–0.24]), and CBT specifically (SMD=–0.43, [–0.68,–0.17]), but not VRET. These results show that dental anxieties are manageable and treatable. Clinicians should ensure that interventions match their purpose—managing acute emotions during treatment, or alleviating chronic anxiety and avoidance tendencies. Existing research gaps underscore the necessity for future trials to minimize bias and follow CONSORT reporting guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少成人状态焦虑、牙科特质焦虑和牙科恐惧症的干预措施:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本综述评估了针对成人状态焦虑(牙科治疗过程中的恐惧和情绪困扰)、慢性牙科(特质)焦虑或牙科恐惧症(特质焦虑过高;符合特殊恐惧症的诊断标准)进行干预的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们系统地搜索了七个在线数据库。173项研究性试验符合纳入标准,其中67项符合14项汇总分析的条件。为减轻口腔手术中的状态焦虑,中度确定性证据支持采用催眠(SMD=-0.31,95 %CI[-0.56,-0.05]),低确定性证据支持处方苯二氮卓类药物(SMD=-0.43,[-0.74,-0.12])。关于心理疗法,减轻状态焦虑的证据尚无定论,不支持虚拟现实暴露疗法(VRET)、虚拟现实分散注意力疗法、音乐、芳香疗法、视频信息和针灸。在减轻特质焦虑方面,中度确定性证据支持使用认知行为疗法(CBT;SMD=-0.65,[-1.06,-0.24])。关于牙科恐惧症,中低度确定性证据支持采用心理疗法(SMD=-0.48,[-0.72,-0.24]),特别是 CBT(SMD=-0.43,[-0.68,-0.17]),但不支持 VRET。这些结果表明,牙科焦虑是可以控制和治疗的。临床医生应确保干预措施与其目的相匹配--在治疗过程中控制急性情绪,或减轻慢性焦虑和回避倾向。现有的研究差距突出表明,未来的试验必须最大限度地减少偏倚,并遵循 CONSORT 报告指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder - a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial" Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2024), Volume 104, June 2024, 102873. Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals Interplay of serum BDNF levels and childhood adversity in predicting earlier-onset post-traumatic stress disorder: A two-year longitudinal study Negative emotion differentiation buffers against intergenerational risk for social anxiety in at-risk adolescent girls Intensive treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1