Traumatic pelvic ring fracture during pregnancy: a systematic review.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Efort Open Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1530/EOR-23-0164
Arvin Eslami, Mohammadreza Chehrassan, Shaya Alimoghadam, Karim Pisoudeh, Amir Kasaeian, Omid Elahifar
{"title":"Traumatic pelvic ring fracture during pregnancy: a systematic review.","authors":"Arvin Eslami, Mohammadreza Chehrassan, Shaya Alimoghadam, Karim Pisoudeh, Amir Kasaeian, Omid Elahifar","doi":"10.1530/EOR-23-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aims to investigate the management and outcomes of pelvic ring fractures (PRFs) during pregnancy, emphasizing maternal and fetal mortality rates, mechanisms of injury, and treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of databases from 2000 to 2023, identifying 33 relevant studies. Data extraction included demographics, fracture types, treatment methods, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal mortality stood at 9.1%, with fetal mortality at 42.4%. Maternal factors impacting mortality included head trauma and hemodynamic instability. Fetal mortality correlated with mechanisms like motor vehicle accidents and maternal vital signs. Surgical and conservative treatments were applied, with a majority of pelvic surgeries performed before delivery. External fixators proved effective in fracture stabilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pelvic ring fractures during pregnancy present significant risks to maternal and fetal health. Early stabilization and vigilant monitoring of maternal vital signs are crucial. Vaginal bleeding/discharge serves as a critical fetal risk indicator. The choice between surgical and conservative treatment minimally influenced outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored interventions are essential in managing these complex cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aims to investigate the management and outcomes of pelvic ring fractures (PRFs) during pregnancy, emphasizing maternal and fetal mortality rates, mechanisms of injury, and treatment modalities.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of databases from 2000 to 2023, identifying 33 relevant studies. Data extraction included demographics, fracture types, treatment methods, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI criteria.

Results: Maternal mortality stood at 9.1%, with fetal mortality at 42.4%. Maternal factors impacting mortality included head trauma and hemodynamic instability. Fetal mortality correlated with mechanisms like motor vehicle accidents and maternal vital signs. Surgical and conservative treatments were applied, with a majority of pelvic surgeries performed before delivery. External fixators proved effective in fracture stabilization.

Conclusion: Pelvic ring fractures during pregnancy present significant risks to maternal and fetal health. Early stabilization and vigilant monitoring of maternal vital signs are crucial. Vaginal bleeding/discharge serves as a critical fetal risk indicator. The choice between surgical and conservative treatment minimally influenced outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored interventions are essential in managing these complex cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕期创伤性骨盆环骨折:系统性综述。
目的:本系统综述旨在研究妊娠期骨盆环骨折(PRFs)的处理和结果,重点关注孕产妇和胎儿死亡率、损伤机制和治疗方式:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,我们对 2000 年至 2023 年的数据库进行了全面检索,确定了 33 项相关研究。数据提取包括人口统计学、骨折类型、治疗方法和结果。采用JBI标准对偏倚风险进行了评估:产妇死亡率为 9.1%,胎儿死亡率为 42.4%。影响死亡率的产妇因素包括头部创伤和血流动力学不稳定。胎儿死亡率与机动车事故和产妇生命体征等因素有关。手术和保守治疗均有应用,大部分骨盆手术在分娩前进行。事实证明,外固定器能有效稳定骨折:结论:妊娠期骨盆环骨折对母体和胎儿的健康构成重大风险。尽早稳定病情并警惕监测产妇生命体征至关重要。阴道出血/出院是一个重要的胎儿风险指标。选择手术治疗还是保守治疗对结果的影响微乎其微。在处理这些复杂病例时,多学科协作和有针对性的干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for local application in the prevention of surgical site infection after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaplan fibers of iliotibial band: a comprehensive review of current literature. Native intra-articular knee microbiome is a matter of facts: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in military personnel: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1