Rigid ring vs. flexible band for tricuspid valve repair in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Shadi Alaa Abdelaal , Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy , Enas Ewais , Naydeen Mostafa , Ahmed Mohamed Abozaid , Adel Mouffokes , Amnir Moustapha , Mohamed Mohamed , Hazem S. Ghaith , Alaa Ramadan , Nathan Ezie Kengo , Ahmed Negida
{"title":"Rigid ring vs. flexible band for tricuspid valve repair in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Shadi Alaa Abdelaal ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy ,&nbsp;Enas Ewais ,&nbsp;Naydeen Mostafa ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohamed Abozaid ,&nbsp;Adel Mouffokes ,&nbsp;Amnir Moustapha ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mohamed ,&nbsp;Hazem S. Ghaith ,&nbsp;Alaa Ramadan ,&nbsp;Nathan Ezie Kengo ,&nbsp;Ahmed Negida","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; objectives</h3><p>Rigid ring and Flexible band are techniques used to repair tricuspid valve regurgitation. The comparison between both techniques' effectiveness is controversial in the literature. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of rigid ring versus flexible band for tricuspid valve repair in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search was performed in major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify relevant published studies. Data were extracted and analyzed using Stata (version 17 for Mac) and Revman (version 5.4 for Windows).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. Total number of patients was 4259. The rigid ring wasn't superior to the flexible band in terms of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation RR 0.74, 95 % CI (0.43–1.27) (P = 0.29). However, the results were not homogeneous. After employing sensitivity analysis, the significance of the pooled effect estimate didn't change, showing no significant difference between the two annuloplasty RR 0.72, 95%CI (0.45–1.15). On the other hand, the rigid ring was associated with a higher bypass time than the flexible band (RR 4.85, P = 0.00). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, ICU stays, prolonged ventilation, mechanical ventilation time, annuloplasty size, stroke, concomitant mitral valve surgery, concomitant aortic valve surgery, atrial fibrillation, pacemaker implantation, low cardiac output, in-hospital death, or late death (all P &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study findings suggested no difference between rigid ring compared to flexible band regarding the rates of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation; however, rigid ring may encompass a higher bypass time. Therefore, further research is required to ensure our findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 200296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000618/pdfft?md5=9aed2c1aa6c12e009ce3cb659e4ba50d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000618-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives

Rigid ring and Flexible band are techniques used to repair tricuspid valve regurgitation. The comparison between both techniques' effectiveness is controversial in the literature. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of rigid ring versus flexible band for tricuspid valve repair in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation.

Methods

We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search was performed in major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify relevant published studies. Data were extracted and analyzed using Stata (version 17 for Mac) and Revman (version 5.4 for Windows).

Results

Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. Total number of patients was 4259. The rigid ring wasn't superior to the flexible band in terms of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation RR 0.74, 95 % CI (0.43–1.27) (P = 0.29). However, the results were not homogeneous. After employing sensitivity analysis, the significance of the pooled effect estimate didn't change, showing no significant difference between the two annuloplasty RR 0.72, 95%CI (0.45–1.15). On the other hand, the rigid ring was associated with a higher bypass time than the flexible band (RR 4.85, P = 0.00). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, ICU stays, prolonged ventilation, mechanical ventilation time, annuloplasty size, stroke, concomitant mitral valve surgery, concomitant aortic valve surgery, atrial fibrillation, pacemaker implantation, low cardiac output, in-hospital death, or late death (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Our study findings suggested no difference between rigid ring compared to flexible band regarding the rates of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation; however, rigid ring may encompass a higher bypass time. Therefore, further research is required to ensure our findings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三尖瓣反流患者三尖瓣修复术中的硬环与软带:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景& 目的刚环和柔性带是用于修复三尖瓣反流的技术。这两种技术的有效性比较在文献中存在争议。我们进行了这项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以比较刚性环和柔性带对三尖瓣反流患者进行三尖瓣修复的安全性和有效性。我们在主要数据库(包括 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane CENTRAL)中进行了系统检索,以确定已发表的相关研究。使用Stata(Mac版17)和Revman(Windows版5.4)对数据进行提取和分析。患者总数为 4259 人。就术后三尖瓣反流而言,刚性环并不比柔性带更优,RR 0.74,95 % CI (0.43-1.27) (P = 0.29)。然而,结果并不一致。采用敏感性分析后,汇总效应估计值的显著性没有改变,显示两种瓣环成形术 RR 0.72,95%CI(0.45-1.15)之间没有显著差异。另一方面,刚性环比柔性带的分流时间更长(RR 4.85,P = 0.00)。两组患者在住院时间、重症监护室停留时间、延长通气时间、机械通气时间、瓣环成形术大小、卒中、并发二尖瓣手术、并发主动脉瓣手术、心房颤动、起搏器植入、低心排量、院内死亡或晚期死亡方面没有差异(均为 P > 0.05)。结论我们的研究结果表明,在术后三尖瓣反流率方面,硬环与软带相比没有差异;但是,硬环可能需要更长的分流时间。因此,需要进一步研究以确保我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Interplay between lifestyle factors and polygenic risk for incident coronary heart disease in a large multiethnic cohort Comorbidities and determinants of health on heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy adherence: All of us Case detection of familial hypercholesterolemia using various criteria during an annual health examination in the workplace Does the timing of blood pressure medication really matter? Predictive value of glucose coefficient of variation for in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI: Insights from the MIMIC-IV database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1