Announcing the 2024 Winner of the Kroger Outstanding Reviewer Award

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food Science Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.17168
Rich Hartel
{"title":"Announcing the 2024 Winner of the Kroger Outstanding Reviewer Award","authors":"Rich Hartel","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.17168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is time to acknowledge our top reviewer for the past year. Annually, we recognize one reviewer for his/her contributions to the journal, in honor of Manfred Kroger. Dr. Kroger was a long-term editor for <i>Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS)</i>, well known for his diligence in making sure manuscripts were top notch. Much of the credit for the early success of <i>CRFSFS</i> goes to Dr. Kroger.</p><p>To select the Kroger award winner, the Associate Editors first nominate reviewers who have done exceptional review work for them in the past few years, using reviewer performance data to support their nominations. The Scientific Editors then vote as to which candidate should receive the award. The award is based on a number of factors; the number of reviews is important, but also the timeliness and quality of the reviews. The award is presented in person at our annual Reviewers’ Reception at IFT FIRST.</p><p>This year's Manfred Kroger award goes to Dr. Han-Seok Seo of the University of Arkansas, a leading expert in sensory analysis and an outstanding reviewer. He has completed 90 reviews in the last 5 years, averaging 11.6 days turnaround. Clearly, Dr. Seo deserves the 2023 Kroger award.</p><p></p><p>Seo: The scientific journal's organizational structure mirrors that of a soccer team. A typical soccer team's positions, that is, a goalkeeper, defenders, midfielders, and forwards, and their roles correspond, respectively, to an editor in chief, scientific/associate editors, peer reviewers, and authors. Like midfielders who help forwards score the balls or block the opposing team's attempts at scoring before reaching the defensive line, peer reviewers provide authors with helpful comments to improve the quality of their manuscripts. Moreover, peer reviewers play a crucial role in preventing inaccurate, low-quality, and misleading manuscripts from being published by carefully reviewing them. As the midfielder position is considered the engine of a soccer team, peer reviewers are a key component of the journal system. As a journal gains more well-trained, dedicated, and enthusiastic reviewers, its impact significantly grows, like how skilled, committed, and spirited players improve a soccer team's performance. Also, a combination of reviewers from diverse backgrounds and career levels plays an important role in strengthening a journal's review system, similar to how harmonious chemistry between junior and senior players enhances a soccer team's performance. We actively encourage junior scientists to engage in the peer review process. However, I would like to use this opportunity to emphasize the importance of involving peers from a diverse spectrum of backgrounds and career stages, including established scholars and industry researchers, in reviewing manuscripts. Since established scholars and industry researchers may offer insights and perspectives that may be overlooked by junior scientists, I hope they also actively join the manuscript review process. By doing so, we can enhance the cohesion and strength of our journal's review system and scientific communities. Let us work together to strengthen our midfielder position!</p><p>Thank you for those comments, Dr. Seo. I have never thought of myself as the goalie of a soccer team; rather my job as Editor in Chief seems more like a cat herder.</p><p>Again, congratulations to Dr. Seo. His work as midfielder for the <i>Journal of Food Science</i> is greatly appreciated.</p><p></p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Rich Hartel, PhD</p><p>Editor in Chief, <i>Journal of Food Science</i></p><p>Professor, University of Wisconsin–Madison</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.17168","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.17168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is time to acknowledge our top reviewer for the past year. Annually, we recognize one reviewer for his/her contributions to the journal, in honor of Manfred Kroger. Dr. Kroger was a long-term editor for Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS), well known for his diligence in making sure manuscripts were top notch. Much of the credit for the early success of CRFSFS goes to Dr. Kroger.

To select the Kroger award winner, the Associate Editors first nominate reviewers who have done exceptional review work for them in the past few years, using reviewer performance data to support their nominations. The Scientific Editors then vote as to which candidate should receive the award. The award is based on a number of factors; the number of reviews is important, but also the timeliness and quality of the reviews. The award is presented in person at our annual Reviewers’ Reception at IFT FIRST.

This year's Manfred Kroger award goes to Dr. Han-Seok Seo of the University of Arkansas, a leading expert in sensory analysis and an outstanding reviewer. He has completed 90 reviews in the last 5 years, averaging 11.6 days turnaround. Clearly, Dr. Seo deserves the 2023 Kroger award.

Seo: The scientific journal's organizational structure mirrors that of a soccer team. A typical soccer team's positions, that is, a goalkeeper, defenders, midfielders, and forwards, and their roles correspond, respectively, to an editor in chief, scientific/associate editors, peer reviewers, and authors. Like midfielders who help forwards score the balls or block the opposing team's attempts at scoring before reaching the defensive line, peer reviewers provide authors with helpful comments to improve the quality of their manuscripts. Moreover, peer reviewers play a crucial role in preventing inaccurate, low-quality, and misleading manuscripts from being published by carefully reviewing them. As the midfielder position is considered the engine of a soccer team, peer reviewers are a key component of the journal system. As a journal gains more well-trained, dedicated, and enthusiastic reviewers, its impact significantly grows, like how skilled, committed, and spirited players improve a soccer team's performance. Also, a combination of reviewers from diverse backgrounds and career levels plays an important role in strengthening a journal's review system, similar to how harmonious chemistry between junior and senior players enhances a soccer team's performance. We actively encourage junior scientists to engage in the peer review process. However, I would like to use this opportunity to emphasize the importance of involving peers from a diverse spectrum of backgrounds and career stages, including established scholars and industry researchers, in reviewing manuscripts. Since established scholars and industry researchers may offer insights and perspectives that may be overlooked by junior scientists, I hope they also actively join the manuscript review process. By doing so, we can enhance the cohesion and strength of our journal's review system and scientific communities. Let us work together to strengthen our midfielder position!

Thank you for those comments, Dr. Seo. I have never thought of myself as the goalie of a soccer team; rather my job as Editor in Chief seems more like a cat herder.

Again, congratulations to Dr. Seo. His work as midfielder for the Journal of Food Science is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Rich Hartel, PhD

Editor in Chief, Journal of Food Science

Professor, University of Wisconsin–Madison

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宣布 2024 年克罗格杰出评论员奖得主。
现在是表彰过去一年中的最佳审稿人的时候了。我们每年都会表彰一位为期刊做出贡献的审稿人,以纪念曼弗雷德-克罗格(Manfred Kroger)。克罗格博士曾长期担任《食品科学与食品安全综合评论》(CRFSFS)的编辑,因其在确保稿件一流方面的勤奋而闻名。为了评选克罗格奖得主,副主编们首先提名在过去几年中为他们做了出色审稿工作的审稿人,并用审稿人的表现数据来支持他们的提名。然后由科学编辑投票决定哪位候选人获奖。该奖项基于多个因素:审稿数量很重要,审稿的及时性和质量也很重要。今年的曼弗雷德-克罗格奖授予阿肯色大学的 Han-Seok Seo 博士,他是感官分析领域的顶尖专家和杰出的审稿人。他在过去 5 年中完成了 90 项评审工作,平均周转天数为 11.6 天。显然,Seo 博士理应获得 2023 年克罗格奖:科学杂志的组织结构与足球队如出一辙。一支典型足球队的位置,即守门员、后卫、中场和前锋,他们的角色分别对应主编、科学/副主编、同行评审员和作者。就像中场球员帮助前锋进球,或在对方球员到达防线前阻挡对方的进球企图一样,同行评审员也为作者提供有益的意见,以提高稿件质量。此外,同行评审员通过认真审稿,在防止不准确、低质量和误导性稿件发表方面发挥着至关重要的作用。正如中场球员被视为足球队的发动机一样,同行评审员也是期刊系统的重要组成部分。当期刊拥有更多训练有素、尽职尽责、热情洋溢的审稿人时,期刊的影响力就会显著提高,就像技术娴熟、尽职尽责、精神饱满的球员能提高足球队的成绩一样。此外,来自不同背景和职业水平的审稿人组合在加强期刊审稿系统方面发挥着重要作用,这就好比初级和高级球员之间的和谐化学反应会提高足球队的表现。我们积极鼓励年轻科学家参与同行评审过程。不过,我想借此机会强调让来自不同背景和职业阶段的同行(包括知名学者和行业研究人员)参与审稿的重要性。由于知名学者和行业研究人员可能会提出一些被初级科学家忽视的见解和观点,因此我希望他们也能积极参与审稿过程。这样,我们就能增强期刊审稿系统和科学界的凝聚力和实力。让我们共同努力,巩固我们的中场地位!谢谢您的意见,徐博士。我从不认为自己是足球队的守门员;相反,我作为主编的工作似乎更像一个放猫人。我们非常感谢他作为《食品科学杂志》中译员所做的工作。真诚的,Rich Hartel 博士《食品科学杂志》主编威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校教授
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
期刊最新文献
Chitosan coatings containing thyme essential oil enhance the quality of snakehead (Channa striata) during chilled storage verified by metabolomics approaches. Effect of ultrasound combined with highland barley dietary fiber on gel properties of reduced-salt chicken breast myofibrillar protein. Fractionation of Boswellia serrata oleogum resin essential oil by short-path molecular vacuum distillation: Unveiling potent biological activities and chemical composition. Haematococcus pluvialis meets gellan gum: Rheological and thermal exploration of a new resource food and biomedical gel matrix. Inhibition of polyphenol oxidase for preventing browning in edible mushrooms: A review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1