Patch angioplasty carotid endarterectomy versus eversion carotid endarterectomy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Saudi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.15537/smj.2024.45.7.20240245
Haris Vukas, Samra Kadić-Vukas, Dragan Piljić, Haris Vranić, Anes Jogunčić, Edina Đozić, Juš Kšela
{"title":"Patch angioplasty carotid endarterectomy versus eversion carotid endarterectomy.","authors":"Haris Vukas, Samra Kadić-Vukas, Dragan Piljić, Haris Vranić, Anes Jogunčić, Edina Đozić, Juš Kšela","doi":"10.15537/smj.2024.45.7.20240245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare carotid endarterectomy patch angioplasty (p-CEA) with eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA) and associated risks of early cardio-cerebrovascular complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a prospective randomized single-blind trial, monocentric, clinically applicable, descriptive analytical and comparative. From June 2021 to June 2023, 62 consecutive patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery, admitted to our department and randomized into two groups: carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion carotid endarterectomy. Follow-up for 30 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During surgery e-CEA, 70% patients had an arrhythmia, and 24 hours after 66.7%, seven days after 46.7% and month after 13.3%. During surgery p-CEA, 33.3% patients had an arrhythmia, 24 hours later 33.3%, 7 days after 13.3% and 30 days after 13.3% patients. Statistically significant difference observed during surgery (Fishers <i>p</i>=0.004). One day after the surgery rate of patients with arrhythmia that were treated e-CEA has decreased, but it was still higher than after p-CEA (Fishers <i>p</i>=0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frequency and categorization of postoperative cardiac arrhythmias after eversion carotid endarterectomy, the clinical implications of various postoperative heart rhythm disturbances and their long-term effects on patients need to be further investigate through sufficiently powered randomized controlled studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.7.20240245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare carotid endarterectomy patch angioplasty (p-CEA) with eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA) and associated risks of early cardio-cerebrovascular complications.

Methods: The study was a prospective randomized single-blind trial, monocentric, clinically applicable, descriptive analytical and comparative. From June 2021 to June 2023, 62 consecutive patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery, admitted to our department and randomized into two groups: carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion carotid endarterectomy. Follow-up for 30 days after surgery.

Results: During surgery e-CEA, 70% patients had an arrhythmia, and 24 hours after 66.7%, seven days after 46.7% and month after 13.3%. During surgery p-CEA, 33.3% patients had an arrhythmia, 24 hours later 33.3%, 7 days after 13.3% and 30 days after 13.3% patients. Statistically significant difference observed during surgery (Fishers p=0.004). One day after the surgery rate of patients with arrhythmia that were treated e-CEA has decreased, but it was still higher than after p-CEA (Fishers p=0.010).

Conclusion: The frequency and categorization of postoperative cardiac arrhythmias after eversion carotid endarterectomy, the clinical implications of various postoperative heart rhythm disturbances and their long-term effects on patients need to be further investigate through sufficiently powered randomized controlled studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贴片血管成形术颈动脉内膜切除术与外翻颈动脉内膜切除术。
研究目的比较颈动脉内膜剥脱术(p-CEA)和颈动脉内膜剥脱术(e-CEA)以及相关的早期心脑血管并发症风险:该研究为前瞻性随机单盲试验,单中心、临床适用、描述性分析和比较。2021年6月至2023年6月,我科连续收治62例颈内动脉无症状和无症状狭窄患者,随机分为两组:颈动脉内膜剥脱术加补片血管成形术组和外翻颈动脉内膜剥脱术组。术后随访30天:手术 e-CEA 期间,70% 的患者出现心律失常,术后 24 小时 66.7%,术后 7 天 46.7%,术后一个月 13.3%。在手术期间,33.3%的患者出现心律失常,33.3%的患者在手术 24 小时后出现心律失常,13.3%的患者在手术 7 天后出现心律失常,13.3%的患者在手术 30 天后出现心律失常。手术期间观察到的差异具有统计学意义(Fishers p=0.004)。术后一天,接受 e-CEA 治疗的心律失常患者比例有所下降,但仍高于接受 p-CEA 治疗的患者(Fishers p=0.010):结论:颈动脉内膜剥脱术后心律失常的发生率和分类、术后各种心律紊乱的临床意义及其对患者的长期影响,都需要通过充分的随机对照研究来进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Medical Journal
Saudi Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
203
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.
期刊最新文献
A parasite that should not be neglected in geriatric individuals: Entamoeba histolytica. CAR T-cell therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Characteristics and one-year outcomes of patients with advanced atrioventricular block in Saudi Arabia: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Comparison of the epidemiology of elderly trauma between major trauma centres in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia. Deaths from advanced lung cancer have dropped significantly since immunotherapy became standard-of-care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1