The effectiveness of the in-person and online Gottman Seven Principles Couple Enhancement Program: A propensity score matching design.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of marital and family therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1111/jmft.12726
Rune Zahl-Olsen, Frode Thuen, Thomas Bjerregaard Bertelsen
{"title":"The effectiveness of the in-person and online Gottman Seven Principles Couple Enhancement Program: A propensity score matching design.","authors":"Rune Zahl-Olsen, Frode Thuen, Thomas Bjerregaard Bertelsen","doi":"10.1111/jmft.12726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the effectiveness of the 12-h Gottman Seven Principles couple enhancement program delivered in person and online. In Norway, we recruited 490 participants and 242 people for a control group. All were in close relationships. The revised dyadic adjustment scale (RDAS) was used to assess the quality of their relationships before and after program participation, and at 6-month follow-up. Repeated measures ANOVA, t tests, reliable change, and multilevel multiple regression using propensity score matching to control for confounders were used to investigate the effectiveness of the course. The results demonstrate that the Gottman Seven Principles course improves couple relationships and is equally effective whether delivered in person or online. Furthermore, it does not matter whether there are therapists with a clinical background delivering the course, suggesting that the material itself is sufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of marital and family therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of marital and family therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of the 12-h Gottman Seven Principles couple enhancement program delivered in person and online. In Norway, we recruited 490 participants and 242 people for a control group. All were in close relationships. The revised dyadic adjustment scale (RDAS) was used to assess the quality of their relationships before and after program participation, and at 6-month follow-up. Repeated measures ANOVA, t tests, reliable change, and multilevel multiple regression using propensity score matching to control for confounders were used to investigate the effectiveness of the course. The results demonstrate that the Gottman Seven Principles course improves couple relationships and is equally effective whether delivered in person or online. Furthermore, it does not matter whether there are therapists with a clinical background delivering the course, suggesting that the material itself is sufficient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对面和在线戈特曼七原则夫妇提升计划的有效性:倾向得分匹配设计
本研究调查了 12 小时的 "戈特曼七原则 "夫妻关系提升项目的有效性,该项目可通过面授和在线方式进行。我们在挪威招募了 490 名参与者和 242 名对照组人员。所有参与者都处于亲密关系中。我们使用修订后的夫妻关系调整量表(RDAS)来评估他们在参加课程前后以及随访 6 个月时的夫妻关系质量。研究人员使用了重复测量方差分析、t 检验、可靠变化和多层次多元回归,并使用倾向得分匹配来控制混杂因素,以调查课程的有效性。结果表明,"戈特曼七原则 "课程可以改善夫妻关系,而且无论是面授还是在线授课,效果都是一样的。此外,是否由具有临床背景的治疗师授课并不重要,这表明教材本身就足够了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marital & Family Therapy (JMFT) is published quarterly by the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy and is one of the best known and most influential family therapy journals in the world. JMFT is a peer-reviewed journal that advances the professional understanding of marital and family functioning and the most effective psychotherapeutic treatment of couple and family distress. Toward that end, the Journal publishes articles on research, theory, clinical practice, and training in marital and family therapy.
期刊最新文献
Dyadic examination of parents' general psychological distress and coparenting in families with young children: The mediating role of couple satisfaction. The scale of myths of romantic love: Evidence of validity and reliability of a brief scale in Peru. An update of the Couple Adaptation to Traumatic Stress Model: Systematic research synthesis of the association between secondary trauma survivor functioning and couple functioning. Assessment of forgiveness in couple relationships: Adaptation of the Marital Offense-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS) to a Spanish sample. The importance of highlighting culturally relevant factors in the DEEP analysis when using IBCT with African American couples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1