DDMRP relative priority for production execution: an assessment by simulation

IF 6.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Operations Management Research Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s12063-024-00503-2
Nuno Octávio Fernandes, Matthias Thürer, Sílvio Carmo Silva
{"title":"DDMRP relative priority for production execution: an assessment by simulation","authors":"Nuno Octávio Fernandes, Matthias Thürer, Sílvio Carmo Silva","doi":"10.1007/s12063-024-00503-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Demand-Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP) was designed to improve supply chain performance in complex and uncertain environments. Literature on the topic suggests that production replenishment orders should be dispatched for execution based on the buffers’ penetration ratio of the products ordered, which is a measure of protection against stock depletion. However, the actual performance impact of this dispatching rule remains largely unknown as is the impact of different lot transfer policies. A simulation analysis was carried out to compare the performance of the lowest net flow position, the highest buffer penetration ratio, earliest operation due date and first-come first-served rules under synchronized and unsynchronized lot transfer policies. Results of our study show that the choice of dispatching rules is contingent on the setting of top-of-yellow and top-of-green, which determine the re-order quantity, and on the demand mix of products. The earliest operation due date rule shows great potential to outperform the rule typically applied in a DDMRP context specifically for a high demand mix. These findings provide important insights for improving industrial practice and for guiding future research on DDMRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":46120,"journal":{"name":"Operations Management Research","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00503-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demand-Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP) was designed to improve supply chain performance in complex and uncertain environments. Literature on the topic suggests that production replenishment orders should be dispatched for execution based on the buffers’ penetration ratio of the products ordered, which is a measure of protection against stock depletion. However, the actual performance impact of this dispatching rule remains largely unknown as is the impact of different lot transfer policies. A simulation analysis was carried out to compare the performance of the lowest net flow position, the highest buffer penetration ratio, earliest operation due date and first-come first-served rules under synchronized and unsynchronized lot transfer policies. Results of our study show that the choice of dispatching rules is contingent on the setting of top-of-yellow and top-of-green, which determine the re-order quantity, and on the demand mix of products. The earliest operation due date rule shows great potential to outperform the rule typically applied in a DDMRP context specifically for a high demand mix. These findings provide important insights for improving industrial practice and for guiding future research on DDMRP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DDMRP 生产执行的相对优先级:模拟评估
需求驱动的物料需求计划(DDMRP)旨在改善复杂和不确定环境下的供应链绩效。相关文献表明,生产补给订单应根据订单产品的缓冲渗透率来调度执行,这是防止库存耗尽的一种措施。然而,这种调度规则的实际性能影响以及不同批量转移策略的影响在很大程度上仍是未知数。我们进行了模拟分析,比较了同步和非同步批量转移政策下最低净流量位置、最高缓冲渗透率、最早操作到期日和先到先得规则的性能。研究结果表明,调度规则的选择取决于决定再订货量的黄顶和绿顶的设置以及产品的需求组合。最早作业到期日规则显示出巨大的潜力,特别是在高需求组合的情况下,它优于通常应用于 DDMRP 的规则。这些发现为改进工业实践和指导未来的 DDMRP 研究提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
23.30%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Operations Management Research is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on rapidly publishing high-quality research in the field of operations management. It aims to advance both the theory and practice of operations management across a wide range of topics and research paradigms. The journal covers all aspects of operations management, including manufacturing, supply chain, health care, and service operations. It welcomes various research methodologies, such as case studies, action research, surveys, mathematical modeling, and simulation. The goal of Operations Management Research is to promote research that enhances both the theory and practice of operations management, as it is an applied discipline. The journal also publishes Academic Notes, which are special papers that address research methodologies, the direction of the operations management field, and other topics of interest to academicians. Additionally, there is a demand for shorter and more focused research articles in operations management, which this journal aims to fulfill.
期刊最新文献
Towards supply chain resilience: A structured process approach Strategic maintenance planning in the digital era: a hybrid approach merging Reliability-Centered Maintenance with digitalization opportunities Uncovering the role of sustainable value chain and life cycle management toward sustainable operations in electricity production technologies A stochastic chance-constraint framework for poultry planning and egg inventory management A novel two-stage stochastic programming model to design an integrated disaster relief supply chain network-a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1