Transnational law as an enabler of digital trade

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Uniform Law Review Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI:10.1093/ulr/unae017
Theodora A Christou, Tedd Moya Mose, John L Taylor
{"title":"Transnational law as an enabler of digital trade","authors":"Theodora A Christou, Tedd Moya Mose, John L Taylor","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History records that trade and trade finance, vital to economic advancement and prosperity, have benefited profoundly from technological evolution and accompanying supportive transnational law. Today, the blossoming of technology, most notably digitalization, has the potential to greatly facilitate both domestic and international trade and, just as importantly, to assist in fulfilling the environmental and social goals critical to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. However, obstacles to digital trade arise from the existing legal and regulatory frameworks. Accordingly, legal reforms are overdue. Impetus is now needed to create a fully supportive transnational legal environment. There are several examples of where the technology exists, but the law frustrates its effective deployment. The laws of most jurisdictions require certain trade documents (like bills of lading, payment, and title instruments) to be recorded in a tangible form (paper). The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) estimates that digitalizing trade documents could reduce transaction costs by 80 per cent and eliminate billions of paper documents in the trade system. A limited number of jurisdictions have reformed their laws to address this gap and innovative private sector actors have taken the initiative to benefit from these reforms. An example includes the development of the Distributed Ledger Payment Commitment by BAFT that relies on narrow but effective changes in Delaware law governing promissory notes; others chose to be governed by Singapore law, which recently amended to align with the Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (MLETR). Law can be an enabler of digital trade. To this end, work has begun, including by the ICC and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. But the reform needs to be accelerated. This article considers the benefits of digital trade, key legal obstacles, and how transnational law can enable innovation and digitalization not only of the vast volumes of paper but of the entire trade and trade finance processes.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History records that trade and trade finance, vital to economic advancement and prosperity, have benefited profoundly from technological evolution and accompanying supportive transnational law. Today, the blossoming of technology, most notably digitalization, has the potential to greatly facilitate both domestic and international trade and, just as importantly, to assist in fulfilling the environmental and social goals critical to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. However, obstacles to digital trade arise from the existing legal and regulatory frameworks. Accordingly, legal reforms are overdue. Impetus is now needed to create a fully supportive transnational legal environment. There are several examples of where the technology exists, but the law frustrates its effective deployment. The laws of most jurisdictions require certain trade documents (like bills of lading, payment, and title instruments) to be recorded in a tangible form (paper). The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) estimates that digitalizing trade documents could reduce transaction costs by 80 per cent and eliminate billions of paper documents in the trade system. A limited number of jurisdictions have reformed their laws to address this gap and innovative private sector actors have taken the initiative to benefit from these reforms. An example includes the development of the Distributed Ledger Payment Commitment by BAFT that relies on narrow but effective changes in Delaware law governing promissory notes; others chose to be governed by Singapore law, which recently amended to align with the Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (MLETR). Law can be an enabler of digital trade. To this end, work has begun, including by the ICC and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. But the reform needs to be accelerated. This article considers the benefits of digital trade, key legal obstacles, and how transnational law can enable innovation and digitalization not only of the vast volumes of paper but of the entire trade and trade finance processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为数字贸易推动者的跨国法律
据历史记载,对经济进步和繁荣至关重要的贸易和贸易融资从技术发展和随之而来的支持性跨国法律中获益匪浅。如今,技术的蓬勃发展,尤其是数字化,有可能极大地促进国内和国际贸易,同样重要的是,有助于实现对实现联合国可持续发展目标和《巴黎协定》至关重要的环境和社会目标。然而,数字贸易的障碍来自于现有的法律和监管框架。因此,法律改革早该进行。现在需要加大力度,创造一个充分支持的跨国法律环境。有几个例子表明,技术是存在的,但法律却阻碍了技术的有效应用。大多数司法管辖区的法律都要求某些贸易单据(如提单、付款单和所有权文书)以有形形式(纸张)进行记录。据国际商会(ICC)估计,贸易单据数字化可将交易成本降低 80%,并消除贸易系统中的数十亿份纸质单据。为数不多的司法管辖区已经改革了其法律,以弥补这一差距,而创新的私营部门行为者已经采取主动行动,从这些改革中获益。其中一个例子是 BAFT 开发的分布式账本支付承诺,它依赖于对特拉华州期票法律进行的狭义但有效的修改;其他国家选择受新加坡法律管辖,新加坡法律最近进行了修订,以与《电子可转让记录示范法》(MLETR)保持一致。法律可以成为数字贸易的助推器。为此,国际商会和国际统一私法协会等机构已经开始工作。但改革需要加速。本文探讨了数字贸易的益处、主要法律障碍,以及跨国法律如何促进创新和数字化,不仅是大量纸张的数字化,而且是整个贸易和贸易融资流程的数字化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Interpretation and application of the CISG by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia: an analysis of the judgment in the Boom Conveyor case Electronic enforcement in the digital era: Themis without a sword The Unidroit Principles and the Shari’ah Standards: any room for cooperation? Dealing with registrations and jurisdiction in aircraft financing Revolutionizing trade finance: leveraging the power of blockchain and AI in electronic letters of credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1