The Relationship Between Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation or Behaviors

IF 2.8 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s10608-024-10498-6

Kailyn Fan, Chloe Hudson, Hans Schroder, Elizabeth Kneeland, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Björgvinsson

{"title":"The Relationship Between Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation or Behaviors","authors":"Kailyn Fan, Chloe Hudson, Hans Schroder, Elizabeth Kneeland, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Björgvinsson","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10498-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Research has identified risk factors for suicide, but resilience factors remain unexplored. Our study examined whether stronger emotion malleability beliefs may protect against suicidal ideation (SI) and/or behaviors. We also examined whether emotion malleability beliefs moderates the relation between SI and suicidal behaviors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 514 partial hospital patients) completed the Theories of Emotion Scale that assessed emotion malleability beliefs and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale interview to measure SI severity and presence of suicidal behaviors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Consistent with hypotheses, stronger emotion malleability beliefs was associated with lower levels of past-month SI (β = – .12, <i>p</i> = .009) and lower odds of past-month suicidal behaviors (Exp[<i>B</i>] = 1.06, <i>p</i> = .009). However, these effects were no longer significant when controlling for depressive symptoms (β = – .05, <i>p</i> = .29; Exp[<i>B</i>] = 0.85, <i>p</i> = .11). Unexpectedly, past-month SI was a stronger predictor of past-month suicidal behavior at stronger emotion malleability beliefs (<i>b</i> = .87, <i>p</i> < .001) relative to more moderate (<i>b</i> = .65, <i>p</i> < .001) or weaker beliefs (<i>b</i> = .51, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Emotion malleability beliefs does not predict suicidality beyond depressive symptoms, but paradoxically may increase risk of suicidal thoughts progressing into suicidal behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10498-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Research has identified risk factors for suicide, but resilience factors remain unexplored. Our study examined whether stronger emotion malleability beliefs may protect against suicidal ideation (SI) and/or behaviors. We also examined whether emotion malleability beliefs moderates the relation between SI and suicidal behaviors.

Method

Participants (n = 514 partial hospital patients) completed the Theories of Emotion Scale that assessed emotion malleability beliefs and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale interview to measure SI severity and presence of suicidal behaviors.

Results

Consistent with hypotheses, stronger emotion malleability beliefs was associated with lower levels of past-month SI (β = – .12, p = .009) and lower odds of past-month suicidal behaviors (Exp[B] = 1.06, p = .009). However, these effects were no longer significant when controlling for depressive symptoms (β = – .05, p = .29; Exp[B] = 0.85, p = .11). Unexpectedly, past-month SI was a stronger predictor of past-month suicidal behavior at stronger emotion malleability beliefs (b = .87, p < .001) relative to more moderate (b = .65, p < .001) or weaker beliefs (b = .51, p < .001).

Conclusion

Emotion malleability beliefs does not predict suicidality beyond depressive symptoms, but paradoxically may increase risk of suicidal thoughts progressing into suicidal behaviors.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

情绪可塑性信念与自杀意念或行为之间的关系

研究目的：研究发现了自杀的风险因素，但复原力因素仍未得到探讨。我们的研究探讨了较强的情绪可塑性信念是否可以防止自杀意念（SI）和/或行为。我们还研究了情绪可塑性信念是否会调节 SI 与自杀行为之间的关系。方法参与者（n = 514 名部分住院患者）完成了评估情绪可塑性信念的情绪理论量表和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表访谈，以测量 SI 的严重程度和是否存在自杀行为。结果与假设一致，较强的情绪可塑性信念与较低的上月SI水平（β = - .12，p = .009）和较低的上月自杀行为几率（Exp[B] = 1.06，p = .009）相关。然而，在控制抑郁症状后，这些影响不再显著（β = - .05，p = .29；Exp[B] = 0.85，p = .11）。意想不到的是，相对于较温和的信念（b = .65，p = .001）或较弱的信念（b = .51，p = .001），较强的情绪可塑性信念（b = .87，p = .001）对上个月的自杀行为有更强的预测作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.