Mortality, morbidity, and post-operative complications of typhoid intestinal perforations: global systematic review and meta-analysis

Nienke N. Hagedoorn, Megan Birkhold, Shruti Murthy, Meera D. Rathan, Christian S. Marchello, John A. Crump
{"title":"Mortality, morbidity, and post-operative complications of typhoid intestinal perforations: global systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nienke N. Hagedoorn, Megan Birkhold, Shruti Murthy, Meera D. Rathan, Christian S. Marchello, John A. Crump","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.28.24309663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:\nWe aimed to review global studies reporting on mortality, morbidity, and post-operative complications in patients with typhoid intestinal perforation (TIP).\nSummary Background Data: TIP is a serious and life-threatening complication of typhoid fever that requires emergency surgery and an important driver of typhoid burden.\nMethods:\nWe searched multiple databases for articles reporting case-fatality ratio (CFR) or complications in patients with TIP undergoing surgery published from 1980 through 30 January 2024. We described the prevalence of each reported complication. Of patients with TIP, we pooled CFR using random-effects meta-analysis and stratified by United Nations region, sex, and number of perforations per patient. Results: We included 46 articles reporting on 4,317 patients with TIP. The most prevalent post-operative complications were wound or surgical site infection in 1,537 (50.7%) of 3,030 patients, wound dehiscence in 308 (16.1%) of 1,909, and chest infection in 136 (15.6%) of 872. Overall, the pooled CFR (95%CI) of patients with TIP was 15.6% (12.5-18.9%), and was 20.5% (17.1-23.9%) in 30 observations from the African region, 5.7% (2.6-9.6%) in 15 observations from the Asian region, and 12.2% (0.90-30.4%) in three observations from the Americas. The Pearsons correlation coefficient of median year of data collection and CFR was -0.01 (p=0.95) for Africa and -0.69 (p <0.01) for Asia. Conclusions Disability and death associated with TIP remains substantial. Efforts to reduce the occurrence of TIP through typhoid prevention with vaccine and non-vaccine measures, and increased access to and quality of surgical services for those with TIP are warranted.","PeriodicalId":501051,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.24309663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to review global studies reporting on mortality, morbidity, and post-operative complications in patients with typhoid intestinal perforation (TIP). Summary Background Data: TIP is a serious and life-threatening complication of typhoid fever that requires emergency surgery and an important driver of typhoid burden. Methods: We searched multiple databases for articles reporting case-fatality ratio (CFR) or complications in patients with TIP undergoing surgery published from 1980 through 30 January 2024. We described the prevalence of each reported complication. Of patients with TIP, we pooled CFR using random-effects meta-analysis and stratified by United Nations region, sex, and number of perforations per patient. Results: We included 46 articles reporting on 4,317 patients with TIP. The most prevalent post-operative complications were wound or surgical site infection in 1,537 (50.7%) of 3,030 patients, wound dehiscence in 308 (16.1%) of 1,909, and chest infection in 136 (15.6%) of 872. Overall, the pooled CFR (95%CI) of patients with TIP was 15.6% (12.5-18.9%), and was 20.5% (17.1-23.9%) in 30 observations from the African region, 5.7% (2.6-9.6%) in 15 observations from the Asian region, and 12.2% (0.90-30.4%) in three observations from the Americas. The Pearsons correlation coefficient of median year of data collection and CFR was -0.01 (p=0.95) for Africa and -0.69 (p <0.01) for Asia. Conclusions Disability and death associated with TIP remains substantial. Efforts to reduce the occurrence of TIP through typhoid prevention with vaccine and non-vaccine measures, and increased access to and quality of surgical services for those with TIP are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伤寒肠穿孔的死亡率、发病率和术后并发症:全球系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:我们旨在回顾全球有关伤寒肠穿孔(TIP)患者死亡率、发病率和术后并发症的研究:方法:我们在多个数据库中检索了1980年至2024年1月30日期间发表的报道伤寒肠穿孔手术患者病死率(CFR)或并发症的文章。我们对报告的每种并发症的发生率进行了描述。在TIP患者中,我们使用随机效应荟萃分析对CFR进行了汇总,并根据联合国地区、性别和每位患者的穿孔数量进行了分层。结果:我们共纳入了 46 篇文章,报告了 4,317 名 TIP 患者的情况。术后最常见的并发症是:3,030 名患者中有 1,537 人(50.7%)出现伤口或手术部位感染,1,909 人中有 308 人(16.1%)出现伤口裂开,872 人中有 136 人(15.6%)出现胸部感染。总体而言,TIP 患者的汇总 CFR(95%CI)为 15.6%(12.5%-18.9%),在非洲地区的 30 次观察中为 20.5%(17.1%-23.9%),在亚洲地区的 15 次观察中为 5.7%(2.6%-9.6%),在美洲地区的 3 次观察中为 12.2%(0.90%-30.4%)。非洲地区数据收集年份中位数与 CFR 的皮尔逊相关系数为 -0.01 (p=0.95),亚洲地区为 -0.69 (p <0.01)。结论 与 TIP 相关的残疾和死亡人数仍然很多。有必要通过疫苗和非疫苗措施预防伤寒,并增加伤寒患者获得外科手术服务的机会,提高手术质量,从而减少 TIP 的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The VIPR-1 trial (Visualizing Ischemia in the Pancreatic Remnant) - Assessing the role of intraoperative indocyanine green perfusion of the transected pancreas in predicting postoperative pancreatic leaks: protocol for a prospective phase II trial. Insulin-dependence as a Predictor of Shortened Cancer-specific Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study from the United States Neuroendocrine Study Group Chyme Reinfusion Practices in the Neonatal Population Traumatic Amputations - A Nationwide Epidemiological Analysis of a developing country over 16 years Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1