Impact of rectal washout in local recurrence: a meta-analysis and systemic review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2024.138732
Linhai Meng, Chen Zhuming, Huaiwen Xu, Chaohui Wang, Shuangjiu Hu, Zhe Kai
{"title":"Impact of rectal washout in local recurrence: a meta-analysis and systemic review","authors":"Linhai Meng, Chen Zhuming, Huaiwen Xu, Chaohui Wang, Shuangjiu Hu, Zhe Kai","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2024.138732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction</b><br/>Rectal washout is proposed for eliminating free cancer cells, yet evidence on its efficacy in preventing local recurrence after anterior resection is inconclusive.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>Contrasting rectal washout (RW) and non-rectal washout (NRW) in rectal cancer, a prospective study of randomized control trials (RCT) and non-randomized control trials (NRCT) from January 2005 to July 2023 was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases. Meta-statistical analysis in RevMan 5.4 addressed heterogeneity.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>In analysis involving 19,855 patients (15127 RW, 4728 NRW) from eight studies, RW significantly reduced local recurrence (OR = 0.48), intraoperative RW (OR = 0.65), radical resection margins (OR = 1.89), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR = 0.99) (all p &lt; 0.05). Subgroup RCT analysis reinforced these findings.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>Rectal washout correlates with improved outcomes, while non-washout patients benefit more from neoadjuvant therapy. Notably, rectal washout without neoadjuvant remains efficacious.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2024.138732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction
Rectal washout is proposed for eliminating free cancer cells, yet evidence on its efficacy in preventing local recurrence after anterior resection is inconclusive.

Material and methods
Contrasting rectal washout (RW) and non-rectal washout (NRW) in rectal cancer, a prospective study of randomized control trials (RCT) and non-randomized control trials (NRCT) from January 2005 to July 2023 was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases. Meta-statistical analysis in RevMan 5.4 addressed heterogeneity.

Results
In analysis involving 19,855 patients (15127 RW, 4728 NRW) from eight studies, RW significantly reduced local recurrence (OR = 0.48), intraoperative RW (OR = 0.65), radical resection margins (OR = 1.89), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR = 0.99) (all p < 0.05). Subgroup RCT analysis reinforced these findings.

Conclusions
Rectal washout correlates with improved outcomes, while non-washout patients benefit more from neoadjuvant therapy. Notably, rectal washout without neoadjuvant remains efficacious.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠冲洗对局部复发的影响:一项荟萃分析和系统综述
材料与方法使用 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 MEDLINE 数据库,对 2005 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月的直肠癌随机对照试验 (RCT) 和非随机对照试验 (NRCT) 进行了前瞻性研究,对比了直肠冲洗 (RW) 和非直肠冲洗 (NRW) 的效果。结果在涉及 8 项研究的 19855 例患者(15127 例 RW,4728 例 NRW)的分析中,RW 可显著减少局部复发(OR = 0.48)、术中 RW(OR = 0.65)、根治性切除边缘(OR = 1.89)和新辅助治疗(OR = 0.99)(所有 p 均为 0.05)。结论直肠冲洗与预后改善相关,而非冲洗患者从新辅助治疗中获益更多。值得注意的是,不进行新辅助治疗的直肠冲洗仍然有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
期刊最新文献
Early-stage voiding function following uni- versus bilateral inferior vesical vessel resection during therapeutic lateral lymph node dissection with autonomic nerve sparing for advanced low rectal cancer (with video) Effect and prognosis of endoscopic intracranial hematoma removal and hematoma puncture and drainage in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary metastasis: who benefits the most? Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors Clinical comparative study of laparoscopic partial splenectomy and open partial splenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1