Measuring and reducing implicit prejudice against Black women and people with intersectional identities

IF 4.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1111/spc3.12981
Curtis E. Phills
{"title":"Measuring and reducing implicit prejudice against Black women and people with intersectional identities","authors":"Curtis E. Phills","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses a critical gap in measuring and reducing implicit prejudice: biases against Black women and people with intersectional identities. Though social psychologists have published many methods to measure and interventions to reduce implicit prejudice against Black people, these methods often target biases against Black people or Black men rather than Black women. Thus, these methods may leave Black women out because the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ and the mental representation of Black people is more similar to the mental representation of Black men than Black women. This paper advocates for an intersectional approach to measuring and reducing implicit prejudice that accounts for the unique prejudices faced by Black women. Specifically, this paper argues that researchers should tailor their methods to account for how the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ including differences in stereotypic content and ambivalence. The paper concludes by acknowledging the difficulties related to developing long‐lasting interventions, the need to move beyond reducing implicit prejudice, and the value of studying the men and women of additional racial and ethnic groups and other intersections like sexual orientation and socioeconomic status.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses a critical gap in measuring and reducing implicit prejudice: biases against Black women and people with intersectional identities. Though social psychologists have published many methods to measure and interventions to reduce implicit prejudice against Black people, these methods often target biases against Black people or Black men rather than Black women. Thus, these methods may leave Black women out because the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ and the mental representation of Black people is more similar to the mental representation of Black men than Black women. This paper advocates for an intersectional approach to measuring and reducing implicit prejudice that accounts for the unique prejudices faced by Black women. Specifically, this paper argues that researchers should tailor their methods to account for how the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ including differences in stereotypic content and ambivalence. The paper concludes by acknowledging the difficulties related to developing long‐lasting interventions, the need to move beyond reducing implicit prejudice, and the value of studying the men and women of additional racial and ethnic groups and other intersections like sexual orientation and socioeconomic status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量和减少对黑人妇女和具有交叉身份者的隐性偏见
本文论述了测量和减少隐性偏见方面的一个重要空白:对黑人女性和具有交叉身份者的偏见。尽管社会心理学家已经发表了许多方法来衡量和干预减少对黑人的隐性偏见,但这些方法通常针对的是对黑人或黑人男性的偏见,而不是对黑人女性的偏见。因此,这些方法可能会将黑人女性排除在外,因为黑人女性和黑人男性的心理表征不同,黑人的心理表征与黑人男性的心理表征比黑人女性更为相似。本文主张采用一种考虑到黑人妇女所面临的独特偏见的交叉方法来测量和减少内隐偏见。具体而言,本文认为研究人员应调整他们的方法,以考虑黑人女性和黑人男性的心理表征有何不同,包括刻板印象内容和矛盾心理的差异。最后,本文承认制定长期干预措施存在困难,需要超越减少隐性偏见的范畴,研究其他种族和民族群体的男性和女性以及其他交叉群体(如性取向和社会经济地位)也很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Social and Personality Psychology Compass Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
The role of White identity in anti‐racist allyship On the experience of goals: Differentiating goal‐generic value from goal‐specific value The unseen pillar of behavior: A review of maintenance goals Spiritual capital and spiritual entrepreneurship: The new spiritualities and the processes of subjectivation Carving to excise, carving to create: Conversations on creating and sustaining safe spaces in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1