Exploring the Potential of Off-the-Shelf Tools as Digital Probes: Appropriation of a Mobile Diary App

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE DESIGN ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1162/desi_a_00765
Aysun Aytaç;Sabine Junginger;Jon Rogers
{"title":"Exploring the Potential of Off-the-Shelf Tools as Digital Probes: Appropriation of a Mobile Diary App","authors":"Aysun Aytaç;Sabine Junginger;Jon Rogers","doi":"10.1162/desi_a_00765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When cultural probes emerged in 1999, they were, for the most part, crafted from physical, non-digital, materials used to explore people's lives through playful co-creation and ambiguity. They have since become an important method for design researchers to generate insights into user behavior. Today, there is a growing need for user research to involve remote alternatives, something that was very much amplified during the global COVID-19 pandemic. The ubiquity of smartphones has given researchers the potential to have a remote window into people's lives like never before. This raises questions about the probe-like qualities of smartphone apps from a design research perspective. What options are available to design researchers? What are their strengths and weaknesses? What criteria matter? How can we improve on them? We share what we learned while using a mobile diary app for a remote in-home study with 31 households. We discuss the limitations of the app we ended up using and identify the need for an easy-to-adapt, off-the-shelf digital probe suitable for design researchers. The results and findings are intended to encourage designers to work toward digital probes and provide guidance for those who depend on commercially available mobile dairy apps in the meantime.","PeriodicalId":51560,"journal":{"name":"DESIGN ISSUES","volume":"40 3","pages":"18-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIGN ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10680939/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When cultural probes emerged in 1999, they were, for the most part, crafted from physical, non-digital, materials used to explore people's lives through playful co-creation and ambiguity. They have since become an important method for design researchers to generate insights into user behavior. Today, there is a growing need for user research to involve remote alternatives, something that was very much amplified during the global COVID-19 pandemic. The ubiquity of smartphones has given researchers the potential to have a remote window into people's lives like never before. This raises questions about the probe-like qualities of smartphone apps from a design research perspective. What options are available to design researchers? What are their strengths and weaknesses? What criteria matter? How can we improve on them? We share what we learned while using a mobile diary app for a remote in-home study with 31 households. We discuss the limitations of the app we ended up using and identify the need for an easy-to-adapt, off-the-shelf digital probe suitable for design researchers. The results and findings are intended to encourage designers to work toward digital probes and provide guidance for those who depend on commercially available mobile dairy apps in the meantime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索现成工具作为数字探针的潜力:移动日记应用程序的应用
当文化探针在 1999 年出现时,它们大多是由物理的、非数字的材料制作而成,用于通过游戏性的共同创造和模糊性来探索人们的生活。从那时起,它们就成为设计研究人员深入了解用户行为的重要方法。如今,用户研究越来越需要远程替代方法,这在 COVID-19 全球大流行期间得到了极大的发展。智能手机的普及使研究人员有可能以前所未有的方式远程了解人们的生活。这就从设计研究的角度提出了智能手机应用程序的探究性问题。设计研究人员有哪些选择?它们的优缺点是什么?哪些标准很重要?我们如何改进它们?我们分享了在使用手机日记应用程序对 31 个家庭进行远程居家研究时的心得体会。我们讨论了我们最终使用的应用程序的局限性,并指出了设计研究人员对易于适应的现成数字探针的需求。我们的研究结果和发现旨在鼓励设计人员努力开发数字探针,并为那些在此期间依赖市售移动乳品应用程序的设计人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DESIGN ISSUES
DESIGN ISSUES ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The first American academic journal to examine design history, theory, and criticism, Design Issues provokes inquiry into the cultural and intellectual issues surrounding design. Regular features include theoretical and critical articles by professional and scholarly contributors, extensive book reviews, and illustrations. Special guest-edited issues concentrate on particular themes, such as artificial intelligence, product seminars, design in Asia, and design education. Scholars, students, and professionals in all the design fields are readers of each issue.
期刊最新文献
Introduction The Intersection of Place and Game Design: The Case of Two Classic African Board Games The Disobedience of Design, (vol. Radical Thinkers in Design) Ethnographies of Unimagined Possibilities: Toward a Conversational Paradigm for Human-Centered Design Research Design and Making Things Better: Relating the Pragmatism of John Dewey and Richard McKeon in Design Inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1