Environmental Conditions for Danish Storage Buildings: A Summary of 20 Years of Air Quality Surveys

IF 0.8 4区化学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Studies in Conservation Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1080/00393630.2024.2351761

Morten Ryhl-Svendsen, Signe Hjerrild Smedemark

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air quality in 36 Danish storage buildings was investigated, ranging from naturally ventilated historical buildings to modern purpose-built storage facilities, some with full HVAC climate control s...

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

丹麦仓储建筑的环境条件：20 年空气质量调查总结

调查了 36 座丹麦仓储建筑的空气质量，其中既有自然通风的历史建筑，也有专门建造的现代仓储设施，有些还配备了全套暖通空调（HVAC）气候控制装置。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Conservation 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture. Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.