Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Semantic Scholar

Nick Haupka, Jack H. Culbert, Alexander Schniedermann, Najko Jahn, Philipp Mayr
{"title":"Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Semantic Scholar","authors":"Nick Haupka, Jack H. Culbert, Alexander Schniedermann, Najko Jahn, Philipp Mayr","doi":"arxiv-2406.15154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares and analyses publication and document types in the\nfollowing bibliographic databases: OpenAlex, Scopus, Web of Science, Semantic\nScholar and PubMed. The results demonstrate that typologies can differ\nconsiderably between individual database providers. Moreover, the distinction\nbetween research and non-research texts, which is required to identify relevant\ndocuments for bibliometric analysis, can vary depending on the data source\nbecause publications are classified differently in the respective databases.\nThe focus of this study, in addition to the cross-database comparison, is\nprimarily on the coverage and analysis of the publication and document types\ncontained in OpenAlex, as OpenAlex is becoming increasingly important as a free\nalternative to established proprietary providers for bibliometric analyses at\nlibraries and universities.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.15154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares and analyses publication and document types in the following bibliographic databases: OpenAlex, Scopus, Web of Science, Semantic Scholar and PubMed. The results demonstrate that typologies can differ considerably between individual database providers. Moreover, the distinction between research and non-research texts, which is required to identify relevant documents for bibliometric analysis, can vary depending on the data source because publications are classified differently in the respective databases. The focus of this study, in addition to the cross-database comparison, is primarily on the coverage and analysis of the publication and document types contained in OpenAlex, as OpenAlex is becoming increasingly important as a free alternative to established proprietary providers for bibliometric analyses at libraries and universities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 OpenAlex、Web of Science、Scopus、Pubmed 和 Semantic Scholar 中的出版物和文件类型的分析
本研究对以下书目数据库中的出版物和文件类型进行了比较和分析:OpenAlex、Scopus、Web of Science、SemanticScholar 和 PubMed。结果表明,各个数据库提供商之间的类型学差异很大。此外,由于出版物在各个数据库中的分类方式不同,因此研究文本和非研究文本之间的区别也会因数据源的不同而不同,而这种区别是为文献计量学分析识别相关文献所必需的。除了跨数据库比较之外,本研究的重点主要是 OpenAlex 中所包含的出版物和文献类型的覆盖范围和分析,因为 OpenAlex 作为图书馆和大学文献计量学分析中现有专有提供商的免费替代品正变得越来越重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1