Efficiency and intrinsic quality in healthcare: blending radial and non-radial measures of efficiency with a flashpoint of long-term health policy

Songul Cinaroglu
{"title":"Efficiency and intrinsic quality in healthcare: blending radial and non-radial measures of efficiency with a flashpoint of long-term health policy","authors":"Songul Cinaroglu","doi":"10.1108/jamr-07-2023-0199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Efficiency and quality are primary factors for the survival of health systems. The evaluation of the efficiency of the healthcare system is a crucial component of promoting long-term health policy actions. Healthcare capacity indicators provide a basis for evaluating and comparing the performance of different healthcare organizations. Intrinsic quality indicators are Donabedian (1980)’s structural and process elements of quality of healthcare. This study aims to integrate capacity and intrinsic quality indicators of healthcare while measuring the efficiency of provinces by using radial and non-radial efficiency measurement techniques.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Efficiency analysis performed in Turkey from 2015 to 2020 by performing input-oriented radial, nonradial, and super-efficiency estimates for 81 provinces of Turkey by incorporating capacity and intrinsic quality indicators into the different model specifications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Radial and nonradial efficiency results have an increasing trend over the study years obtained from the efficiency models showing high average scores obtained from the models that include intrinsic quality of care indicators. Statistically significant mean rank differences are observed between different radial efficiency models for all study years (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Negative and moderate level correlations were observed between radial efficiency results and quality of care indicators (r &lt; 0.70).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Under long-term centralized health policies, increases in efficiency result in decreased intrinsic quality of care indicators. A better synthesis of health system capacity and intrinsic healthcare quality indicators is necessary to generate evidence-based health systems.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-07-2023-0199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Efficiency and quality are primary factors for the survival of health systems. The evaluation of the efficiency of the healthcare system is a crucial component of promoting long-term health policy actions. Healthcare capacity indicators provide a basis for evaluating and comparing the performance of different healthcare organizations. Intrinsic quality indicators are Donabedian (1980)’s structural and process elements of quality of healthcare. This study aims to integrate capacity and intrinsic quality indicators of healthcare while measuring the efficiency of provinces by using radial and non-radial efficiency measurement techniques.

Design/methodology/approach

Efficiency analysis performed in Turkey from 2015 to 2020 by performing input-oriented radial, nonradial, and super-efficiency estimates for 81 provinces of Turkey by incorporating capacity and intrinsic quality indicators into the different model specifications.

Findings

Radial and nonradial efficiency results have an increasing trend over the study years obtained from the efficiency models showing high average scores obtained from the models that include intrinsic quality of care indicators. Statistically significant mean rank differences are observed between different radial efficiency models for all study years (p < 0.001). Negative and moderate level correlations were observed between radial efficiency results and quality of care indicators (r < 0.70).

Originality/value

Under long-term centralized health policies, increases in efficiency result in decreased intrinsic quality of care indicators. A better synthesis of health system capacity and intrinsic healthcare quality indicators is necessary to generate evidence-based health systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健的效率和内在质量:将效率的径向和非径向衡量标准与长期医疗政策的闪光点相结合
目的 效率和质量是医疗系统生存的首要因素。评估医疗系统的效率是促进长期医疗政策行动的重要组成部分。医疗保健能力指标为评估和比较不同医疗保健组织的绩效提供了依据。内在质量指标是 Donabedian(1980 年)提出的医疗质量的结构和过程要素。本研究旨在整合医疗保健的能力和内在质量指标,同时使用径向和非径向效率测量技术测量各省的效率。设计/方法/途径通过将能力和内在质量指标纳入不同的模型规格,对土耳其的 81 个省进行以投入为导向的径向、非径向和超效率估计,从而对土耳其 2015 至 2020 年的效率进行分析。研究结果效率模型得出的径向和非径向效率结果在研究期间呈上升趋势,包含内在医疗质量指标的模型得出的平均得分较高。在所有研究年份中,不同径向效率模型之间的平均等级差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。在长期集中式医疗政策下,效率的提高会导致内在医疗质量指标的下降。要建立以证据为基础的医疗系统,就必须更好地综合考虑医疗系统的能力和内在医疗质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The type of supplier involvement in new product development in the automotive industry: metaheuristic-based K-means clustering and analytic hierarchical process methods Resilience of developing economies to external shocks: empirical evidence from CEMAC countries Unbraiding the effect of policy benefits on subjective well-being: the mediating role of work-related well-being Development and psychometric validation of a scale for sources of resistance to change in higher education institutions Assessment of bus fleet service quality: a graph theoretical approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1