Evaluation of appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare institutions in China using proxy indicator

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101132
Haishaerjiang Wushouer , Junxuan Yu , Kexin Du , Weihsin Ko , Weibin Li , Kairui Zhang , Shuo Chen , Bo Zheng , Luwen Shi , Xiaodong Guan
{"title":"Evaluation of appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare institutions in China using proxy indicator","authors":"Haishaerjiang Wushouer ,&nbsp;Junxuan Yu ,&nbsp;Kexin Du ,&nbsp;Weihsin Ko ,&nbsp;Weibin Li ,&nbsp;Kairui Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuo Chen ,&nbsp;Bo Zheng ,&nbsp;Luwen Shi ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our objectives were to develop a set of proxy indicators (PIs) suited for assessing antibiotic use appropriateness in China's primary healthcare institutions (PHIs), and assess performance scores of these PIs while exploring factors that influence the antibiotic appropriateness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We selected potential PIs for the PHIs through a RAND–modified Delphi procedure, and assessed clinimetric properties, focusing on measurability, applicability, and potential for improvement. PIs with favorable clinimetric properties were used to evaluate antibiotic prescription appropriateness by calculating performance scores of each PI. Institutions were categorized into three clusters representing different levels of appropriateness. We used the chi–square test and an ordinal logistic regression model at PHI level to explore factors influencing antibiotic appropriateness.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Eighteen PIs were developed through two rounds of online surveys and one face–to–face meeting involving 20 stakeholders. All PIs met the clinimetric properties criteria and were used to analyze 209,662 antibiotic prescriptions across 269 PHIs. The percentage of PHIs meeting the target ranged from 3.1% to 69.3%, with 6 PIs below 10%. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions was significantly associated with percentages of patients’ gender of the PHIs.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>The varied and suboptimal performance of the PIs indicated the need for diverse efforts to enhance the rational antibiotic use at PHI level. It was necessary to devise distinct sets of PIs for diverse settings in future endeavors.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>This work was supported by the <span>National Natural Science Foundation of China</span> (grant numbers <span>72374009</span>, <span>81973294</span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524001263/pdfft?md5=a908531c1b27bbc7deca2ad88a3854e6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666606524001263-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524001263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Our objectives were to develop a set of proxy indicators (PIs) suited for assessing antibiotic use appropriateness in China's primary healthcare institutions (PHIs), and assess performance scores of these PIs while exploring factors that influence the antibiotic appropriateness.

Methods

We selected potential PIs for the PHIs through a RAND–modified Delphi procedure, and assessed clinimetric properties, focusing on measurability, applicability, and potential for improvement. PIs with favorable clinimetric properties were used to evaluate antibiotic prescription appropriateness by calculating performance scores of each PI. Institutions were categorized into three clusters representing different levels of appropriateness. We used the chi–square test and an ordinal logistic regression model at PHI level to explore factors influencing antibiotic appropriateness.

Findings

Eighteen PIs were developed through two rounds of online surveys and one face–to–face meeting involving 20 stakeholders. All PIs met the clinimetric properties criteria and were used to analyze 209,662 antibiotic prescriptions across 269 PHIs. The percentage of PHIs meeting the target ranged from 3.1% to 69.3%, with 6 PIs below 10%. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions was significantly associated with percentages of patients’ gender of the PHIs.

Interpretation

The varied and suboptimal performance of the PIs indicated the need for diverse efforts to enhance the rational antibiotic use at PHI level. It was necessary to devise distinct sets of PIs for diverse settings in future endeavors.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 72374009, 81973294).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用替代指标评估中国基层医疗机构抗生素处方的合理性
背景我们的目标是开发一套适合评估中国基层医疗卫生机构抗生素使用适宜性的替代指标(PIs),并评估这些替代指标的绩效得分,同时探讨影响抗生素适宜性的因素。方法我们通过兰德公司改进的德尔菲程序为基层医疗卫生机构筛选出潜在的替代指标,并评估其临床特性,重点是可测量性、适用性和改进潜力。通过计算每项 PI 的绩效得分,利用具有良好临床测量特性的 PI 来评估抗生素处方的适宜性。研究机构被分为三个群组,分别代表不同的适宜性水平。通过两轮在线调查和一次有 20 名相关人员参加的面对面会议,我们制定了 18 个 PI。所有 PI 均符合临床属性标准,并用于分析 269 个 PHI 中的 209662 份抗生素处方。符合目标的 PHI 百分比从 3.1% 到 69.3% 不等,其中有 6 个 PI 低于 10%。抗生素处方的适当性与 PHIs 中患者的性别百分比有显著相关。本文由国家自然科学基金资助(基金号:72374009,81973294)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
A contemporary analysis of the Australian clinical and genetic landscape of spinal muscular atrophy: a registry based study A complex intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in rural China: a cluster randomised controlled trial Impact of time to antibiotics on clinical outcome in paediatric febrile neutropenia: a target trial emulation of 1685 episodes Why I decide to leave South Korea healthcare system Towards an agenda of action and research for making health systems responsive to the needs of people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1