Highly defended nudibranchs ‘escape’ to visually distinct background habitats

Abstract

The ‘escape and radiate’ hypothesis predicts that once species have evolved aposematism, defended species can utilise more visually diverse visual backgrounds as they ‘escape’ the need to be well camouflaged. This enables species to explore new ecological niches, resulting in increased diversification rates. To test this hypothesis’ ‘escape’ component, we examined whether the background habitats of 12 nudibranch mollusc species differed among species depending on the presence and strength of chemical defences. We obtained a rich array of colour pattern statistics using Quantitative Colour Pattern Analysis (QCPA) to analyse backgrounds viewed through the eyes of a potential predator (triggerfish, Rhinecanthus aculeatus). Colour pattern analysis was done at viewing distances simulating an escalating predation sequence. We identified four latent factors comprising 17 non-correlated colour pattern parameters, which captured the among-species variability associated with differences in chemical defences. We found that chemically defended species, indeed, were found on visually distinct backgrounds with increased colour and luminance contrast, independent of viewing distance. However, we found no evidence for increased among-species background diversity coinciding with the presence and strength of chemical defences. Our results agree with the ‘escape and radiate’ hypothesis, suggesting that potent chemical defences in Dorid nudibranchs coincide with spatiochromatic differences of visual background habitats perceived by potential predators.