Changxiao Zhao, Hao Li, Wei Zhang, Jun Dai, Lei Dong
{"title":"Risk Identification and Safety Assessment of Human-Computer Interaction in Integrated Avionics Based on STAMP","authors":"Changxiao Zhao, Hao Li, Wei Zhang, Jun Dai, Lei Dong","doi":"10.23919/jsee.2024.000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To solve the problem of risk identification and quantitative assessment for human-computer interaction (HCI) in complex avionics systems, an HCI safety analysis framework based on system-theoretical process analysis (STPA) and cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) is proposed. STPA-CREAM can identify unsafe control actions and find the causal path during the interaction of avionics systems and pilot with the help of formal verification tools automatically. The common performance conditions (CPC) of avionics systems in the aviation environment is established and a quantitative analysis of human failure is carried out. Taking the head-up display (HUD) system interaction process as an example, a case analysis is carried out, the layered safety control structure and formal model of the HUD interaction process are established. For the interactive behavior “Pilots approaching with HUD”, four unsafe control actions and 35 causal scenarios are identified and the impact of common performance conditions at different levels on the pilot decision model are analyzed. The results show that HUD's HCI level gradually improves as the scores of CPC increase, and the quality of crew member cooperation and time sufficiency of the task is the key to its HCI. Through case analysis, it is shown that STPA-CREAM can quantitatively assess the hazards in HCI and identify the key factors that impact safety.","PeriodicalId":50030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/jsee.2024.000031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To solve the problem of risk identification and quantitative assessment for human-computer interaction (HCI) in complex avionics systems, an HCI safety analysis framework based on system-theoretical process analysis (STPA) and cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) is proposed. STPA-CREAM can identify unsafe control actions and find the causal path during the interaction of avionics systems and pilot with the help of formal verification tools automatically. The common performance conditions (CPC) of avionics systems in the aviation environment is established and a quantitative analysis of human failure is carried out. Taking the head-up display (HUD) system interaction process as an example, a case analysis is carried out, the layered safety control structure and formal model of the HUD interaction process are established. For the interactive behavior “Pilots approaching with HUD”, four unsafe control actions and 35 causal scenarios are identified and the impact of common performance conditions at different levels on the pilot decision model are analyzed. The results show that HUD's HCI level gradually improves as the scores of CPC increase, and the quality of crew member cooperation and time sufficiency of the task is the key to its HCI. Through case analysis, it is shown that STPA-CREAM can quantitatively assess the hazards in HCI and identify the key factors that impact safety.