Dosimetric characteristics of self-expandable metallic and plastic stents for transpapillary biliary decompression in external beam radiotherapy.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s13246-024-01447-4
Yoshihiro Ueda, Kenji Ikezawa, Tomohiro Sagawa, Masaru Isono, Shingo Ohira, Masayoshi Miyazaki, Ryoji Takada, Takuo Yamai, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa, Teruki Teshima, Koji Konishi
{"title":"Dosimetric characteristics of self-expandable metallic and plastic stents for transpapillary biliary decompression in external beam radiotherapy.","authors":"Yoshihiro Ueda, Kenji Ikezawa, Tomohiro Sagawa, Masaru Isono, Shingo Ohira, Masayoshi Miyazaki, Ryoji Takada, Takuo Yamai, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa, Teruki Teshima, Koji Konishi","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01447-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is little evidence regarding radiation dose perturbation caused by the self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) used for transpapillary biliary decompression. We aimed to compare SEMSs with plastic stents (PSs) and clarify their dosimetric characteristics. Fifteen SEMSs (10 braided and 5 lasercut type) and six PSs (diameter: 2.3-3.3 mm) were inserted into a water-equivalent solid phantom. In total, 13 SEMSs had radiopaque markers, whereas the other two did not. Using radiochromic films, the dose difference adjacent to the stents at locations proximal, distal, and arc delivery to the radiation source was evaluated based on comparison to measurement of the dose delivery in phantom without any stent in place. The median values of the dose difference for each stent were used to compare the SEMS and PS groups.Results: The dose difference (median (minimum/maximum)) was as follows: proximal, SEMSs + 2.1% (1.8 / 4.7) / PSs + 5.4% (4.1 / 6.3) (p < 0.001); distal, SEMSs -1.0% (-1.6 /-0.4) / PSs -8.9% (-11.7 / -7.4) (p < 0.001); arc delivery, SEMSs 1.2% (0.9 / 2.3) / PSs 2.2% (1.6 / 3.6) (p = 0.005). These results demonstrated that the dose differences of SEMSs were significantly smaller than those of PSs. On the other hand, the dose difference was large at surface of the radiopaque markers for SEMSs: proximal, 10.3% (7.2 / 20.9); distal, -8.4% (-16.3 / -4.2); arc delivery, 5.5% (4.2 / 9.2). SEMSs for biliary decompression can be safely used in patients undergoing radiotherapy, by focusing on the dose distribution around the stents and by paying attention to local changes in the dose distribution of radiopaque markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01447-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is little evidence regarding radiation dose perturbation caused by the self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) used for transpapillary biliary decompression. We aimed to compare SEMSs with plastic stents (PSs) and clarify their dosimetric characteristics. Fifteen SEMSs (10 braided and 5 lasercut type) and six PSs (diameter: 2.3-3.3 mm) were inserted into a water-equivalent solid phantom. In total, 13 SEMSs had radiopaque markers, whereas the other two did not. Using radiochromic films, the dose difference adjacent to the stents at locations proximal, distal, and arc delivery to the radiation source was evaluated based on comparison to measurement of the dose delivery in phantom without any stent in place. The median values of the dose difference for each stent were used to compare the SEMS and PS groups.Results: The dose difference (median (minimum/maximum)) was as follows: proximal, SEMSs + 2.1% (1.8 / 4.7) / PSs + 5.4% (4.1 / 6.3) (p < 0.001); distal, SEMSs -1.0% (-1.6 /-0.4) / PSs -8.9% (-11.7 / -7.4) (p < 0.001); arc delivery, SEMSs 1.2% (0.9 / 2.3) / PSs 2.2% (1.6 / 3.6) (p = 0.005). These results demonstrated that the dose differences of SEMSs were significantly smaller than those of PSs. On the other hand, the dose difference was large at surface of the radiopaque markers for SEMSs: proximal, 10.3% (7.2 / 20.9); distal, -8.4% (-16.3 / -4.2); arc delivery, 5.5% (4.2 / 9.2). SEMSs for biliary decompression can be safely used in patients undergoing radiotherapy, by focusing on the dose distribution around the stents and by paying attention to local changes in the dose distribution of radiopaque markers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于外照射胆道减压的自膨胀金属和塑料支架的剂量特性
关于用于经胆管胆道减压的自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)所造成的辐射剂量扰动,目前还没有什么证据。我们的目的是比较 SEMS 与塑料支架(PS),并明确它们的剂量特性。我们将 15 个 SEMS(10 个编织型和 5 个激光切割型)和 6 个 PS(直径:2.3-3.3 毫米)插入水当量固体模型中。共有 13 个 SEMS 带有不透射线标记,而另外两个则没有。使用放射性变色胶片,通过与未安装任何支架的模型中的剂量传输测量结果进行比较,评估了支架附近的近端、远端和弧形辐射源传输位置的剂量差。每个支架的剂量差中位值用于比较 SEMS 组和 PS 组:剂量差(中位数(最小值/最大值))如下:近端,SEMSs + 2.1% (1.8 / 4.7) / PSs + 5.4% (4.1 / 6.3) (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
PET/CT-based 3D multi-class semantic segmentation of ovarian cancer and the stability of the extracted radiomics features. PPG2RespNet: a deep learning model for respirational signal synthesis and monitoring from photoplethysmography (PPG) signal Ecg signal watermarking using QR decomposition Effect of mirror system and scanner bed of a flatbed scanner on lateral response artefact in radiochromic film dosimetry A deep learning phase-based solution in 2D echocardiography motion estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1