Patient Perceived Quality of Virtual Group Contraception Counseling.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Open access journal of contraception Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S467537
Keemi Ereme, Kaidee Akullo, Quetzal A Class, Erica Hinz
{"title":"Patient Perceived Quality of Virtual Group Contraception Counseling.","authors":"Keemi Ereme, Kaidee Akullo, Quetzal A Class, Erica Hinz","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S467537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study examines the feasibility, quality of counseling, and knowledge after a virtual Group Contraception Counseling (GCC) session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At an urban academic hospital, we recruited English-speaking pregnant women aged 15-49 who had access to a video-enabled electronic device. Participants engaged in a standardized 45-minute educational session about contraceptive methods in groups of two to five persons conducted over a video conferencing platform. The primary outcome was participant perceived quality of contraception counseling measured by the Person-Centered Contraception Counseling (PCCC) scale. The secondary outcomes were knowledge change before and after counseling, and postpartum contraception uptake. We used an adjusted multivariable linear regression model to analyze knowledge scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two participants completed the study. Participants identified primarily as Black or Hispanic/Latinx (78%), in a partnership (50%), having completed college (59%), and having an annual income of less than $50,000 (78%). A total of 77% of participants recorded a perfect score for quality of counseling using the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale. There was an increase in knowledge after counseling (Mean difference (M)=0.07, p<0.01). Notably, certain subsets of participants had decrease in knowledge scores after counseling. Participants who used postpartum contraception were more likely to have increase in knowledge after counseling compared to those who did not (Mean difference (M)=0.09, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest virtual group contraception counseling is feasible for providing high-quality counseling and can possibly increase contraceptive knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":"15 ","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S467537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The study examines the feasibility, quality of counseling, and knowledge after a virtual Group Contraception Counseling (GCC) session.

Methods: At an urban academic hospital, we recruited English-speaking pregnant women aged 15-49 who had access to a video-enabled electronic device. Participants engaged in a standardized 45-minute educational session about contraceptive methods in groups of two to five persons conducted over a video conferencing platform. The primary outcome was participant perceived quality of contraception counseling measured by the Person-Centered Contraception Counseling (PCCC) scale. The secondary outcomes were knowledge change before and after counseling, and postpartum contraception uptake. We used an adjusted multivariable linear regression model to analyze knowledge scores.

Results: Twenty-two participants completed the study. Participants identified primarily as Black or Hispanic/Latinx (78%), in a partnership (50%), having completed college (59%), and having an annual income of less than $50,000 (78%). A total of 77% of participants recorded a perfect score for quality of counseling using the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale. There was an increase in knowledge after counseling (Mean difference (M)=0.07, p<0.01). Notably, certain subsets of participants had decrease in knowledge scores after counseling. Participants who used postpartum contraception were more likely to have increase in knowledge after counseling compared to those who did not (Mean difference (M)=0.09, p<0.01).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest virtual group contraception counseling is feasible for providing high-quality counseling and can possibly increase contraceptive knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对虚拟集体避孕咨询质量的感知。
简介:本研究探讨了虚拟集体避孕咨询(GCC)课程的可行性、咨询质量和知识:本研究探讨了虚拟集体避孕咨询(GCC)的可行性、咨询质量以及咨询后的知识掌握情况:方法:我们在一家城市学术医院招募了 15-49 岁、会讲英语且能使用视频电子设备的孕妇。参与者通过视频会议平台,以 2 至 5 人为一组,参加 45 分钟的标准化避孕方法教育课程。主要结果是参与者对避孕咨询质量的感知,采用以人为本的避孕咨询(PCCC)量表进行测量。次要结果是咨询前后的知识变化以及产后避孕率。我们使用调整后的多变量线性回归模型来分析知识得分:22 名参与者完成了研究。参与者的主要身份是黑人或西班牙裔/拉丁裔(78%)、伴侣(50%)、大学毕业(59%)、年收入低于 50,000 美元(78%)。使用 "以人为本的避孕咨询"(PCCC)量表,共有 77% 的参与者在咨询质量方面获得了满分。咨询后,参与者的知识水平有所提高(平均差 (M)=0.07, p结论:我们的研究结果表明,虚拟小组避孕咨询在提供高质量咨询方面是可行的,并有可能增加避孕知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of Publicly Available State Reimbursement Policies for Removal and Reinsertion of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Patient Perceived Quality of Virtual Group Contraception Counseling. Prevalence of Depression Among Women Using Hormonal Contraceptives in Mogadishu, Somalia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? Erratum: United States Government-Supported Family Planning and Reproductive Health Outreach in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Lessons Learned and Recommendations [Corrigendum].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1