The effect of aromatherapy on patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101882
Luying Liu , Rui Liu , Lijun Zhang , Yuanyuan Tang , Chaofeng Fan
{"title":"The effect of aromatherapy on patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Luying Liu ,&nbsp;Rui Liu ,&nbsp;Lijun Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Tang ,&nbsp;Chaofeng Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To systematically investigate the efficacy of aromatherapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a comprehensive search for papers published until November 2023 using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. This study was conducted following the PRISMA and Cochrane Guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed to assess the comparative effectiveness of inhalation aromatherapy versus controls in individuals diagnosed with ACS. The Jadad rating method was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and a meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.4 software. Heterogeneity was quantified using the Higgins I2 (%) test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 12 RCTs with 476 patients with ACS were included. Aromatherapy has been shown to reduce anxiety scores significantly (standard mean difference [SMD]: −1.18, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: −1.33 to −1.03; P &lt; 0.00001) along with reduction in systolic blood pressure (MD = -8.78, 95 % CI [-13.92, −3.65], P = 0.008); diastolic blood pressure (MD = −7.76, 95 % CI [-11.39, −4.12], P &lt; 0.001); mean artery pressure MD = −9.68, 95 % CI [-13.93.-5.44]; P &lt; 0.0001). However, no significant effects were reported on the heart rate (MD = −6.98, 95 % CI [-15.46, 1.50], P = 0.11) and respiratory rate (MD = −0.67, 95 % CI [-2.52, 1.19], P = 0.48). A greater frequency of aromatherapy was associated greater anxiety −1.80 incidence, with 95 % CI [-2.04, −1.56]. Citrus essential oils exhibited the strongest effect (SMD = −1.97, 95 % CI [-3.34, −0.60], P = 0.005) in reducing anxiety levels.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Aromatherapy appears to be an effective non-pharmacological intervention for reducing blood pressure and anxiety in individuals with ACS. This suggests that aromatherapy more than twice a day is effective in reducing anxiety levels. However, aromatherapy had no statistically significant impact on the heart or respiratory rates. Moreover, additional high-quality RCTs should be conducted to verify these results and explore the efficacy and mechanism of aromatherapy in patients with ACS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000550/pdfft?md5=c203157117a4a56c88a96fffb51d9670&pid=1-s2.0-S1744388124000550-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically investigate the efficacy of aromatherapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search for papers published until November 2023 using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. This study was conducted following the PRISMA and Cochrane Guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed to assess the comparative effectiveness of inhalation aromatherapy versus controls in individuals diagnosed with ACS. The Jadad rating method was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and a meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.4 software. Heterogeneity was quantified using the Higgins I2 (%) test.

Results

A total of 12 RCTs with 476 patients with ACS were included. Aromatherapy has been shown to reduce anxiety scores significantly (standard mean difference [SMD]: −1.18, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: −1.33 to −1.03; P < 0.00001) along with reduction in systolic blood pressure (MD = -8.78, 95 % CI [-13.92, −3.65], P = 0.008); diastolic blood pressure (MD = −7.76, 95 % CI [-11.39, −4.12], P < 0.001); mean artery pressure MD = −9.68, 95 % CI [-13.93.-5.44]; P < 0.0001). However, no significant effects were reported on the heart rate (MD = −6.98, 95 % CI [-15.46, 1.50], P = 0.11) and respiratory rate (MD = −0.67, 95 % CI [-2.52, 1.19], P = 0.48). A greater frequency of aromatherapy was associated greater anxiety −1.80 incidence, with 95 % CI [-2.04, −1.56]. Citrus essential oils exhibited the strongest effect (SMD = −1.97, 95 % CI [-3.34, −0.60], P = 0.005) in reducing anxiety levels.

Conclusion

Aromatherapy appears to be an effective non-pharmacological intervention for reducing blood pressure and anxiety in individuals with ACS. This suggests that aromatherapy more than twice a day is effective in reducing anxiety levels. However, aromatherapy had no statistically significant impact on the heart or respiratory rates. Moreover, additional high-quality RCTs should be conducted to verify these results and explore the efficacy and mechanism of aromatherapy in patients with ACS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芳香疗法对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:系统研究芳香疗法对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的疗效:系统研究芳香疗法对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的疗效:我们使用以下数据库对 2023 年 11 月之前发表的论文进行了全面检索:PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library。本研究遵循 PRISMA 和 Cochrane 指南进行。纳入标准为随机对照试验(RCT),目的是评估吸入芳香疗法与对照疗法对确诊为 ACS 患者的比较效果。采用 Jadad 评分法评估纳入研究的质量,并使用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行荟萃分析。异质性采用希金斯I2(%)检验进行量化:结果:共纳入了 12 项 RCT,476 名 ACS 患者。结果表明,芳香疗法可显著降低焦虑评分(标准平均差 [SMD]:-1.18,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-1.33 至-1.03;P 结论:芳香疗法似乎是一种有效的治疗方法:芳香疗法似乎是降低 ACS 患者血压和焦虑的有效非药物干预措施。这表明,每天两次以上的芳香疗法可有效降低焦虑水平。然而,芳香疗法对心率和呼吸率的影响在统计学上并不显著。此外,应进行更多高质量的 RCT 研究来验证这些结果,并探索芳香疗法对 ACS 患者的疗效和机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
期刊最新文献
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with core stability training in postpartum women with diastasis rectus abdominis Editorial Board The effect of an aromatic solution applied after percutaneous nephrolithotomy on sore throat, thirst, and nausea-vomiting: A randomised controlled trial Effects of aromatherapy on discomfort in mothers undergoing cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Assessing barriers to meditation in patients with substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1