Key performance indicators in pre-hospital response to disasters and mass casualty incidents: a scoping review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02533-8
Nikolaos Markou-Pappas, Hamdi Lamine, Luca Ragazzoni, Marta Caviglia
{"title":"Key performance indicators in pre-hospital response to disasters and mass casualty incidents: a scoping review.","authors":"Nikolaos Markou-Pappas, Hamdi Lamine, Luca Ragazzoni, Marta Caviglia","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02533-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to offer a comprehensive synthesis of the existing Key performance indicators (KPIs) used in the evaluation of the pre-Hospital response to disasters and mass casualty incidents (MCIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the end of December 2022 a scoping review has been performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline to identify articles describing the use of KPIs to assess the performance of first responders during the prehospital phase of an MCI (real or simulated). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, fourteen articles were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven articles applied indicators in exercises and/or simulations. Two articles proposed new KPIs, and one used KPIs for developing a model for benchmarking pre-Hospital response. All articles analyzed quantitative indicators of time, whereas two studied indicators of structure, of process, and of outcome as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from this review emphasize the need for employing common terminology and using uniformed data collection tools, if obtaining standardized evaluation method is the goal to be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02533-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to offer a comprehensive synthesis of the existing Key performance indicators (KPIs) used in the evaluation of the pre-Hospital response to disasters and mass casualty incidents (MCIs).

Methods: At the end of December 2022 a scoping review has been performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline to identify articles describing the use of KPIs to assess the performance of first responders during the prehospital phase of an MCI (real or simulated). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, fourteen articles were included in the analysis.

Results: Eleven articles applied indicators in exercises and/or simulations. Two articles proposed new KPIs, and one used KPIs for developing a model for benchmarking pre-Hospital response. All articles analyzed quantitative indicators of time, whereas two studied indicators of structure, of process, and of outcome as well.

Conclusion: The findings from this review emphasize the need for employing common terminology and using uniformed data collection tools, if obtaining standardized evaluation method is the goal to be achieved.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
院前应对灾害和大规模伤亡事件的关键绩效指标:范围审查。
目的:本研究的目的是对用于评估灾害和大规模伤亡事件(MCIs)院前响应的现有关键绩效指标(KPIs)进行全面综述:方法:2022 年 12 月底,我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Medline 上进行了一次范围界定审查,以确定描述使用 KPI 评估急救人员在 MCI(真实或模拟)院前阶段表现的文章。根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,14 篇文章被纳入分析:结果:有 11 篇文章在练习和/或模拟中应用了指标。两篇文章提出了新的关键绩效指标,一篇文章使用关键绩效指标开发了医院前响应基准模型。所有文章都分析了时间量化指标,两篇文章还研究了结构、过程和结果指标:本综述的结论强调,如果要获得标准化的评估方法,就必须使用通用术语和统一的数据收集工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Non-operative treatment of metacarpal fractures and patient-reported outcomes: a multicentre snapshot study. Focus on challenges and advances in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Publisher Correction: How does damage control strategy influence organ's suitability for donation after major trauma? A multi-institutional study. TBI related death has become the new epidemic in polytrauma: a 10-year prospective cohort analysis in severely injured patients Angioembolization in patients with blunt splenic trauma in Germany –guidelines vs. Reality a retrospective registry-based cohort study of the TraumaRegister DGU®
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1