A randomized fellow-eye controlled trial study of 1% terpinen-4-ol vs 1% tea tree oil eyelid cleanser for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction

Preamjit Saonanon , Wannit Witoonchart , Dusadee Charnvanich , Somphob Thompho , Kittichai Chaiseeda , Yuda Chongpison , Vannarut Satitpitakul
{"title":"A randomized fellow-eye controlled trial study of 1% terpinen-4-ol vs 1% tea tree oil eyelid cleanser for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction","authors":"Preamjit Saonanon ,&nbsp;Wannit Witoonchart ,&nbsp;Dusadee Charnvanich ,&nbsp;Somphob Thompho ,&nbsp;Kittichai Chaiseeda ,&nbsp;Yuda Chongpison ,&nbsp;Vannarut Satitpitakul","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the pre- and post-treatment differences in non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) between a 1 % terpinen-4-ol (T4O) and a 1 % tea tree oil (TTO) eyelid cleanser</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Thirty-three participants diagnosed with MGD were enrolled. All patients and the outcome evaluator were masked to the treatment allocation. One eye of each patient was randomly assigned to receive the T4O cleanser, while the fellow eye received the TTO cleanser. Baseline and eight week assessments included the collection of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, NITBUT (in seconds), lipid layer thickness (in nanometers), ocular surface staining scores, and the presence of Demodex as cylindrical dandruff. The main outcome measurement was the pre- and post-treatment difference in NITBUT. Patient preference, safety, and tolerability were also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistically significant increase in NITBUT in the T4O group (<em>n</em> = 30; 2.27 ± 1.09; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.12–4.42; <em>p</em> = 0.038), but not in the TTO group (<em>n</em> = 30; 0.04 ± 1.10; 95 % CI: -2.19–2.11; <em>p</em> = 0.972). Both groups showed significant improvement in post-treatment ocular surface staining scores. Fifteen subjects (50 %) preferred TTO due to less cooling sensation experienced during application, nine (30 %) preferred T4O, and six (20 %) had no preference. No major adverse events were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Eyelid cleaning with 1 % T4O in MGD for eight weeks was found to increase NITBUT with good tolerability, although it was less preferred compared to TTO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000522/pdfft?md5=2046fe79ed7a02ef6c7d8de683495eba&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000522-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the pre- and post-treatment differences in non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) between a 1 % terpinen-4-ol (T4O) and a 1 % tea tree oil (TTO) eyelid cleanser

Design

A randomized controlled trial

Method

Thirty-three participants diagnosed with MGD were enrolled. All patients and the outcome evaluator were masked to the treatment allocation. One eye of each patient was randomly assigned to receive the T4O cleanser, while the fellow eye received the TTO cleanser. Baseline and eight week assessments included the collection of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, NITBUT (in seconds), lipid layer thickness (in nanometers), ocular surface staining scores, and the presence of Demodex as cylindrical dandruff. The main outcome measurement was the pre- and post-treatment difference in NITBUT. Patient preference, safety, and tolerability were also assessed.

Results

There was a statistically significant increase in NITBUT in the T4O group (n = 30; 2.27 ± 1.09; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.12–4.42; p = 0.038), but not in the TTO group (n = 30; 0.04 ± 1.10; 95 % CI: -2.19–2.11; p = 0.972). Both groups showed significant improvement in post-treatment ocular surface staining scores. Fifteen subjects (50 %) preferred TTO due to less cooling sensation experienced during application, nine (30 %) preferred T4O, and six (20 %) had no preference. No major adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

Eyelid cleaning with 1 % T4O in MGD for eight weeks was found to increase NITBUT with good tolerability, although it was less preferred compared to TTO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗睑板腺功能障碍的 1%特平宁-4-醇与 1%茶树油眼睑清洁剂的随机同眼对照试验研究
目的比较 1 % 的松脂酸-4-醇(T4O)和 1 % 的茶树油(TTO)眼睑清洁剂在非侵入性泪液破裂时间(NITBUT)方面治疗前后的差异。所有患者和结果评估者均被蒙蔽,不知道治疗分配。每名患者的一只眼睛被随机分配接受T4O清洁剂,另一只眼睛则接受TTO清洁剂。基线和八周评估包括收集眼表疾病指数 (OSDI) 问卷、NITBUT(以秒为单位)、脂质层厚度(以纳米为单位)、眼表染色评分,以及作为圆柱形皮屑的眼球脱墨虫的存在情况。主要结果测量指标是治疗前后 NITBUT 的差异。结果T4O组(n = 30;2.27 ± 1.09;95 % 置信区间 [CI]:0.12-4.42;p = 0.038)的NITBUT有统计学意义上的显著增加,而TTO组(n = 30;0.04 ± 1.10;95 % CI:-2.19-2.11;p = 0.972)则没有。两组治疗后的眼表染色评分均有明显改善。15名受试者(50%)倾向于使用 TTO,因为在使用过程中冷却感较小,9 名受试者(30%)倾向于使用 T4O,6 名受试者(20%)没有偏好。结论在 MGD 中使用 1 % 的 T4O 进行为期八周的眼睑清洁可增加 NITBUT,且耐受性良好,但与 TTO 相比,受试者对 T4O 的偏好度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical profile of newly diagnosed glaucoma patients in Brazil Intravitreal dexamethasone implant concomitant to cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa: potential retinal preservation effect FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets Gender based differences in electronic medical record utilization in an academic ophthalmology practice Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1